Detroit City Council approves $650K settlement in excessive force lawsuit against police officers

During the Detroit City Council meeting on January 22, 2025, significant discussions centered around legal representation and settlement requests related to various lawsuits involving city employees and the police department. The council reviewed multiple line items, each pertaining to requests for indemnification and legal support for staff members facing litigation.

One of the primary topics was the request for legal representation for several animal care and control staff members, including Director Mark Kumpf and Field Operations Manager Carl McClanahan, in connection with a lawsuit filed by Shauntae Phillips against the City of Detroit. After addressing concerns, the council unanimously moved to recommend approval for this request.

Another notable item was a settlement request involving Lakisha Hines, with the council approving a settlement of $99,000. Additionally, a settlement of $32,500 was approved for a lawsuit involving Robbie and Shaniqua Daish against the city.

A more contentious discussion arose regarding a significant settlement of $650,000 related to the case of Michael Kinnebrew versus several city officials and the police department. Council members expressed concerns about the decision-making process leading to this settlement, particularly regarding the interpretation of facts and the potential for trial. Attorney Graham Anderson from the law department explained that while there was an initial plan to go to trial, judicial influence and negotiations led to the decision to settle. This prompted further discussion among council members about the implications for taxpayers and the need for accountability regarding the involved police officer.

The meeting highlighted ongoing challenges the Detroit City Council faces in managing legal liabilities and ensuring proper oversight of city employees. As the council continues to navigate these complex issues, the implications of their decisions will resonate within the community, particularly concerning public trust and fiscal responsibility. The council plans to follow up on these discussions in future sessions, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability in handling such sensitive matters.