Detroit residents demand dissolution of land bank over unethical practices and property mismanagement

During the Detroit City Council's Planning and Economic Development meeting on January 16, 2025, significant concerns were raised regarding the operations of the Detroit Land Bank Authority (DLBA). Community members voiced their frustrations over perceived unethical practices and inefficiencies that they believe hinder local development and opportunities for residents.

Tonya Gladney, a local advocate, opened the public comment session by criticizing the DLBA for prioritizing profit over community needs. She highlighted issues such as tax evasion and the land bank's tendency to sell properties exclusively to investors, which she argued deprives local families and small businesses of vital opportunities. Gladney called for the dissolution of the land bank, citing its failure to manage over 200,000 parcels of land effectively.

Adam Barrett from Detroiters for Tax Justice echoed these sentiments, expressing his discontent with the land bank's lack of oversight and accountability. He proposed that the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) governing the land bank should be reviewed every two years instead of the current ten-year cycle. Barrett also criticized the mayor's control over board appointments, suggesting that the city council should have this authority to ensure better representation of community interests.

Another speaker, Daniel Hayner, shared his personal struggles with the land bank's customer service, detailing a six-year wait for resolution on issues related to 14 vacant lots. He emphasized the inadequacy of the land bank's maintenance efforts compared to his own proactive care for the properties, raising questions about the land bank's operational effectiveness.

The council members acknowledged the concerns raised during the public comments, particularly regarding the land bank's customer service and management practices. They indicated that the land bank would be discussed further in the meeting, signaling a commitment to addressing these community issues.

As the council continues to deliberate on the future of the DLBA, the voices of residents like Gladney, Barrett, and Hayner highlight a growing demand for transparency, accountability, and a shift in focus towards community-driven development in Detroit. The outcomes of these discussions could significantly impact local governance and the revitalization of neighborhoods across the city.