[{"_1":2,"_123":-5,"_124":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99,111],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6670884,"mediaKeyId","2171839-69a247760e7e90c5ab5178152fa65fd5","parentId",2171839,"title","City staff outlines effects of recent federal funding pause and reports ahead on storm cleanup progress","audioSeconds",266,"startMs",1276000,"endMs",1542000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2171839-69a247760e7e90c5ab5178152fa65fd5&start=1276&end=1542","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2171839-69a247760e7e90c5ab5178152fa65fd5/thumbnail_1276000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6670884/Glendale/Los-Angeles-County/California/City-staff-outlines-effects-of-recent-federal-funding-pause-and-reports-ahead-on-storm-cleanup-progress","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6670884-fa22925eca794600d5f727d6908d7dd9/orig.mp4?Expires=1775597960&Signature=YvV3Aoa6abx0v-H6MM~N4wEwNE0o8OzyU4nYF4cLbEXU3WrwAw-MHJ3omks42RjFOKNMh9I1WqTKdws9dWsgjpvZzVVd0yCrVcaEhbHlQSK7NYnER1RhUsToGIP-ULEvnFwLU86G2MDQoxOnPvPErN-VrXG32dZkWF3Jx7PKqEeeBbZFQsNjPE40IAjAloj3iQdYrsrLBvZyVBki5uzuiE9fvnSzvjn8uIrcTr5jgaNu07yU8eMBk36xnAKtxdEM8vUpFG~hcbT9l2tQsJjd-Sbhx02951ZjkjIW6Rl1ro2e7jqP9G0DEJ3JdzJRHg2kE5fSZJwhEYqOuzkZocx6hg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Glendale","date","2025-01-30T05:15:01.15Z","article","City staff briefed the Glendale City Council on Jan. 28 about the impacts of an administration order that temporarily paused some federal funding and on the city’s ongoing storm cleanup.

John Taktalian (Finance), speaking for the administration, said the order was a broad, short‑lived directive that affects many program areas and entities that receive federal pass‑through funds. He told the council that while some large programs were verbally identified as excluded, staff were still clarifying the scope and expected timelines. “Direct assistance programs such as Section 8 are excluded from this particular order, and we will be able to make those payments to landlords at the beginning of next month,” Taktalian said, listing commonly excluded categories (Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, Pell grants and certain small‑business assistance) as noted by federal guidance. He said the federal judge’s order is temporary and was expected to be in place for about a week while agencies review programs to determine continued eligibility.

Taktalian said the city’s large federally funded programs that were of immediate concern included Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding of about $4.2 million, the Elderly Nutrition Meals Program, Emergency Solutions Grant funding and Continuum of Care homelessness funding. He said the city had reserves in some accounts and did not expect immediate service disruptions, but that a prolonged pause would require contingency planning and could prompt a special council session. Councilmembers asked staff to assemble contingency options if the pause lengthened.

Public Works reported progress on storm cleanup after recent high‑wind and rain events. Public Works Director Hernandez reported nearly 600 service calls (589) with 302 trees down and 285 large limbs. Hernandez said crews had nearly completed systematic sweeps on seven of 12 maintenance districts, had deployed contractor crews (including West Coast Harbors) for surge work and were tracking ahead of an initial 6–8 week estimate, now projecting 4–5 weeks to complete the main sweep barring further weather. Staff said a Saturday crew deployment and overtime would accelerate the effort and that the department would inform residents when later individual requests remained.

Ending: Council directed staff to return quickly with contingency plans should the federal funding pause extend; public works will continue accelerated cleanup and return with status updates.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","City Council - 1/28/25","oneSentenceSummary","Finance staff described how a recent federal funding pause could affect CDBG and other passthrough programs while Public Works reported near‑completion of storm cleanup efforts, with nearly 600 service calls handled to date.","taxTitle","Glendale, Los Angeles County, California","taxId",4651,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6670888,"Council authorizes single‑source purchase of broadcast AV gear for Alex Theater control room",68,11532000,11600000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2171839-69a247760e7e90c5ab5178152fa65fd5&start=11532&end=11600","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2171839-69a247760e7e90c5ab5178152fa65fd5/thumbnail_11532000.jpg","/articles/6670888/Glendale/Los-Angeles-County/California/Council-authorizes-singlesource-purchase-of-broadcast-AV-gear-for-Alex-Theater-control-room","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6670888-c098932fb5bf5d8950db98e75c7706ea/orig.mp4?Expires=1775597960&Signature=k226xsceZ-j3ZNUBRROP~c7Rrej9keZvZof3etiipDz2RT2mkZnrEKQUjE9txoL0~3Cfqa98plNqMUxxaMQYbLRNETTmCZ8Egxb~v2IRsc39pXaWXtygJzof51OUZyJO0KLO9cpKhfadJIlK5q8MQBji3a00IjaCNz7qtNLgImhIcKexdGaNuHhYZUZcE5us2fm1SySz8Jc2FwVZCPaosYz6Pv2ZV10raXS-XfFNycfbYDJxMISE3prmlaioNpCHr2Mz9aGxX3N9wFb8ISIAUH9a~UQRVL6uvPyA5rDtwcfMERQwNTwFEFbh~37XXneGTeLOcnboD~LOvgqnHjBuUA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Councilmembers approved a resolution dispensing with competitive bidding and authorized purchase and installation of specialized multi‑camera broadcast and control‑room equipment for the Alex Theater at the Jan. 28 meeting. Staff described the equipment as “specialized broadcast‑quality multi‑camera AV equipment” to support theater productions and city broadcasts.

The action authorized a single‑source purchase and installation from the vendor identified in the staff report (TV Pro Gear). Staff explained the decision as a single‑source procurement justified by product compatibility and the specialist nature of the control‑room equipment. The council voted unanimously to dispense with bidding and authorize the procurement; no final contract dollar amount was specified in the public motion.

Ending: Staff will complete vendor contracting and schedule installation; the report did not include a dollar figure in the agenda package, and staff said they would return with final procurement documents and implementation timing as required by city procurement rules.","The council approved a single‑source procurement and installation of multi‑camera broadcast equipment for the Alex Theater, authorizing staff to dispense with competitive bidding and buy from the identified vendor.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6670892,"Council approves purchase of crash‑rated downtown planters using TDA funds",6895,4635000,11530000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2171839-69a247760e7e90c5ab5178152fa65fd5&start=4635&end=11530","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2171839-69a247760e7e90c5ab5178152fa65fd5/thumbnail_4635000.jpg","/articles/6670892/Glendale/Los-Angeles-County/California/Council-approves-purchase-of-crashrated-downtown-planters-using-TDA-funds","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6670892-b6106bbfa8cbd0bb938fd3919ef53766/orig.mp4?Expires=1775597960&Signature=EZ2GURIijSSRzt7CtEXBGVbyMryR8sri9jWnQiOnMTtkMrgtPfD2nkytICsOIxqQoXv8RdS3QHLQE6ofhabeQahMGOK9F-k6hHZPFVd0Omb19EPsRsmJ20PKY4KaMkJF17fSvfauAC3eIBuLnJyKV0ui7-EAos8VtZ3rB1MuPzxKFSo49UI7TaYmK1s2ab7mpyK38pVfBjuOtVYTs5fLdDJNE448D8er1JMKykZiHxN-cpKU3OJphyUmIYTLCrdPosiJ~c--oSP8wAQJu959Y-bXO6yzY-TIkejIFB0~eTxAIWwWnaQL752SblWyHhpMoVW~kdwwaifeEOUfmUYmAA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Glendale City Council approved a motion on Jan. 28 to dispense with competitive bidding and to purchase 60 crash‑rated concrete pedestrian planters for downtown bridges and an Orange Street alleyway, citing beautification and pedestrian comfort as objectives. The staff report sought authorization to buy the planters as a TDA‑eligible small capital improvement.

The agenda described the purchase as a single‑source procurement from QCP Corp for specialized, crash‑rated concrete planters. Staff reported a purchase price of $297,008 and requested a resolution of appropriation for $266,525 in Transportation Development Act (TDA) grant funds to cover the project. Several councilmembers supported the project as a means to improve the walking environment and to create a more welcoming corridor linking north and south sides of Brand and Central. One councilmember objected, calling the work “beautification” rather than a true pedestrian‑safety capital project and urged greater private‑sector participation.

The council approved the purchase by roll call (four yeas, one nay). The tally recorded in the meeting minutes: Council Member Brotman — no; Council Member Garpetian — yes; Council Member Kasakian — yes; Council Member Najarian — yes; Mayor — yes. Staff said the Greater Downtown Glendale Association would help maintain the planters and that the city would work with public‑art or branding staff to refine signage or graphics to reduce visual clutter.

Ending: The project was approved and staff will proceed with purchase and placement; councilmembers asked staff to explore coordination with the city’s public‑art program and with downtown stakeholders on visual design and maintenance.","Council voted to waive competitive bidding and authorized purchase and installation of crash‑rated concrete planters for Brand/ Central bridges and an Orange Street alleyway; vote was 4–1 with one dissenting vote over use of transportation funds for what some called beautification.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6670897,"Glendale hears wide feedback on proposed plastic‑waste ordinance after vendor outreach; businesses ask for more incentives",1380,6180000,7560000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2171839-69a247760e7e90c5ab5178152fa65fd5&start=6180&end=7560","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2171839-69a247760e7e90c5ab5178152fa65fd5/thumbnail_6180000.jpg","/articles/6670897/Glendale/Los-Angeles-County/California/Glendale-hears-wide-feedback-on-proposed-plasticwaste-ordinance-after-vendor-outreach-businesses-ask-for-more-incentives","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6670897-9cc84f962ed7cf44ad8bc9d316659d0c/orig.mp4?Expires=1775597960&Signature=hiwxA~ddnI4y2qoZeoLEJFvDGOu1Dru~AJFAiTPImOMwH8~qZC8~V9Vnzm4sNYr0isMTEV5-KKojRUIEBpsywm858~HixTQTUTGzmmXkE04JgFwiHB-z89FNF-UsrXaG2xg8OBTwPK~8TJVWJHfPydgen~3~Ds6TDMAp9rKBBu~pVV24-vsU2XE9wjldMBcD49W6hc5t55KmlxFi6JMYS5pWlQFrZukVha4bqsoHoHlLg3AkTamAhvJit5Qd8167OEgWs6p2cw2iFfKmQW7OtbYTVvPQrf8alN7obhQO4eQFSfDQb7uEGcmZf2CTifBO43EKNQHo7ipI5hIEEQ8htQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","City sustainability staff and an outside consultant presented a proposed plastic‑waste reduction ordinance and outreach findings to the Glendale City Council on Jan. 28, emphasizing compromises made after two rounds of direct engagement with local food and beverage businesses.

David Jones, Glendale’s sustainability officer, outlined the ordinance’s goals: minimize single‑use plastics and encourage reuse or certified compostable/recyclable alternatives. He said the proposed rules would generally prohibit non‑compliant single‑use items and require compostable or recyclable materials for many to‑go containers, with phased timelines. Rebecca Allen of Recreate Waste Collaborative summarized two outreach rounds: staff visited and surveyed businesses, held webinars and a vendor fair, and created a QR‑linked list of compliant products.

Allen reported that, after staff revised the proposal (notably removing a customer cup charge and allowing recyclables as an interim option), business support increased in the subset surveyed. “From round 1 to round 2 the support increased by 13%,” Allen said, noting that confidence in implementation also rose. Cost and perceived product performance for compostable materials remained the primary concerns. Restaurants that rely heavily on takeout told outreach teams they preferred a phased implementation and requested help sourcing compliant products.

Public comment included a mix of support and concern. Several Pearl‑area and downtown business owners and representatives urged more and larger incentives, cooperative purchasing, and practical options for small kitchens that lack space for dishwashers. Rebecca Allen and other speakers described candidate incentives staff identified: (a) a one‑time purchase assistance program (example: $500 per qualifying small establishment, staff‑recommended $50,000 per year for two years) to offset higher initial costs for compliant products; and (b) a capital improvement fund (staff example: $100,000 per year for two years) to help pay for plumbing or dishwasher installations needed to use reusables.

Several community speakers urged ambitious action to reduce plastic litter and health risks from microplastics. Others, including small independent operators, urged caution and asked for detailed, item‑level cost comparisons and staged timelines so businesses could adapt. A number of speakers urged that the city coordinate with neighboring jurisdictions (Burbank was cited repeatedly) to avoid disrupting businesses that operate in multiple cities.

Staff did not bring a final ordinance vote at the Jan. 28 meeting. Instead, councilmembers asked staff to return with more detailed implementation materials: specific incentive program designs (including cooperative purchasing/bulk procurement options and grant or rebate program parameters), clearer product lists and procurement guidance, and examples of capital‑assistance programs to retrofit small kitchens. Staff also noted state law constraints (for example, AB 1276, which restricts automatic inclusion of utensils) and said it would propose an implementation timetable and education plan to reduce compliance burdens.

Ending: The item was presented as an action item for introduction and discussion; public comment and council questions prompted staff to gather more detailed incentive options and cost estimates and return with a refined draft ordinance and implementation plan before final adoption.","Staff and a consultant summarized two rounds of outreach to restaurants and food businesses on a proposed ordinance to phase out certain single‑use plastics and require compostable/recyclable or reusable alternatives; businesses praised changes but requested more incentives, phased implementation and clearer product guidance.",{"_33":112,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":113,"_41":114,"_43":115,"_45":116,"_47":117,"_49":118,"_51":119,"_53":120,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":121,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":122,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6670902,"Glendale council reviews formal rules for public comment, decorum and meeting cameras",1191,2857000,4048000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2171839-69a247760e7e90c5ab5178152fa65fd5&start=2857&end=4048","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2171839-69a247760e7e90c5ab5178152fa65fd5/thumbnail_2857000.jpg","/articles/6670902/Glendale/Los-Angeles-County/California/Glendale-council-reviews-formal-rules-for-public-comment-decorum-and-meeting-cameras","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6670902-dbfb4b9e340428590ced9cacd7813c51/orig.mp4?Expires=1775597960&Signature=WRlApOLBsMJ0kESg8OH1JPlPUixkjRpXBVv-itktjfUXdJ91iz1d1fwgf7l7~aUHniUeFWGQS02BmuRsyLjHiURoQ-ylP6tPfP4oQsXspaoo5A2RlW0F0c5ZyH7lS1e59vXWTUEMME9V~tOrYYjKHkUSXNezHMs3vSHM7yNDeh1PT-vPQu3g65E0a0G-ZYjk9prZDTPavHgfpfIwbr13QyDQfaaqFq3gz314-p32enlyghCxCCNwWk7kS6tHDa0CGdig8XAUDu5T81cH-sujI69nF6zLMMKBTuPX3jOgnQumgA644~tvRVVtQ5s6c3uMQPM99Tt-i1e5494q5t1~aQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","City Attorney staff presented a formal review of Glendale’s rules for public comment, meeting decorum and council deliberations during the Jan. 28 Glendale City Council meeting, urging clearer written procedures while recognizing the Brown Act’s free‑speech and limited‑forum constraints. The presentation surveyed other jurisdictions’ public‑comment systems and offered options on speaker time limits, combining comment periods, handling disruptive behavior and whether cameras should show wide views of the audience.

The staff report summarized what other cities do and emphasized that the Brown Act allows cities to adopt viewpoint‑neutral, reasonable rules for meetings. “The Brown Act requires that the public have the opportunity to speak on agenda items before, during the discussion and also speak on matters that are within the subject‑matter jurisdiction of the council,” City Attorney Mike Garcia said during the presentation. Garcia reviewed case law and recommended codifying procedures for warnings and removals when conduct is disruptive, while preserving ordinary protections for offensive but protected speech.

Councilmembers debated several specific options. On public comment format, council members split over whether to combine agenda and non‑agenda comments in a single early period or keep separate periods and allow speakers who come early to speak on agenda items. Several councilmembers supported creating a consolidated early public‑comment period (chairable community/announcement block) limited to 30 minutes, with 3‑minute speaker maximums and the presiding officer (mayor) retaining discretion to shorten time when many speakers are present. Members also asked staff to preserve the city code’s five‑minute “oral communications” provision unless the council amends the municipal code.

On decorum and removal, Garcia recommended requiring at least one explicit warning before removing disruptive individuals (except where immediate force or threat of force is present) and recommended written rules on signs, ceding of time and addressing the dais rather than the room. Councilmembers asked staff to clarify procedures for points of order and appeals of chair rulings; the city attorney advised that points of order remain available under the rules and that a council decision to overturn a chair’s ruling requires a majority vote.

Camera angles and audience visibility drew sustained discussion. Some councilmembers argued that showing speakers’ faces increases transparency for remote viewers; others said showing wide shots of the audience has led to viral clips and made some speakers targets of public ridicule. Multiple councilmembers favored a compromise (split or dual display) and asked staff to propose a specification that would limit wide audience shots during quasi‑judicial hearings while preserving broader views for oral communications or community announcements.

Council members also discussed the idea of a meeting cutoff time (staff noted other cities use an 11 p.m. benchmark). Several members said a formal cutoff that requires consultation with the city manager before proceeding past the hour would help protect public participation and staff workload; staff agreed to draft language modeled on neighboring cities’ practices. On council deliberation, options included a first round for every member, with subsequent rounds limited and the mayor speaking last; some members asked only for procedural reminders rather than hard time caps.

The council did not adopt new rules at the Jan. 28 meeting. Councilmembers directed staff and the city attorney to return with a resolution and draft code amendments that would: (a) formalize warning/ removal procedures for disruptive conduct consistent with case law and the Brown Act; (b) present options for early consolidated public comment (30 minutes) with 3‑minute default time and mayoral discretion; (c) propose a meeting cutoff procedure (example: 11 p.m., with council majority able to extend); and (d) propose camera‑angle guidelines, including a default for showing speaker faces with limited audience wide‑angle for certain meeting segments. Staff said it would circulate proposed language and sample rules from peer cities for council review.

Councilmembers asked staff to make the draft easy for the public to follow and to consult with the city clerk and the city’s broadcast/IT staff on implementable camera settings. The city attorney reiterated that any adopted rules must be viewpoint neutral and reasonable for a limited public forum.

Ending: Staff will return with a proposed resolution and draft municipal‑code amendments for council consideration; no formal rule change was enacted at the Jan. 28 meeting.","City staff presented options to standardize public comment times, decorum enforcement, council debate limits, meeting cutoff time and camera angles after several recent disruptions; councilmembers asked for refinements and staff follow‑up.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

City staff outlines effects of recent federal funding pause and reports ahead on storm cleanup progress

Council authorizes single‑source purchase of broadcast AV gear for Alex Theater control room

Council approves purchase of crash‑rated downtown planters using TDA funds

Glendale hears wide feedback on proposed plastic‑waste ordinance after vendor outreach; businesses ask for more incentives

Glendale council reviews formal rules for public comment, decorum and meeting cameras