Survey reveals residents support paid firefighters but raise concerns on tax impacts

In a recent meeting held on January 1, 2025, the Clear Creek County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC), Clear Creek Fire Authority (CCFA), and local municipalities discussed the results of a community survey aimed at gauging public sentiment on various issues, including wildfire risk, housing costs, and local taxation. The survey, which reached over 35,000 households, received a notable response rate of 344 participants, indicating strong community engagement.

The survey results revealed a high approval rating for the county's management, with residents expressing confidence in how tax dollars are being utilized. However, significant concerns emerged regarding wildfire risks and the rising costs of housing, issues that resonate across many mountain communities in Colorado. These findings highlight the ongoing challenges faced by local governments in balancing community safety and economic viability.

A recurring theme in the survey responses was the apprehension surrounding property taxes, particularly in light of recent assessment changes. Residents voiced their dissatisfaction with property tax discussions, emphasizing a desire for lower taxes, which is a common sentiment throughout the state. Additionally, concerns were raised about the BOCC's role in the fire authority, suggesting a need for clearer communication regarding the authority's responsibilities and funding mechanisms.

Sales tax emerged as a preferred funding option for addressing local needs, but opinions were mixed. Some residents expressed worries about the regressive nature of sales tax, particularly for those on fixed incomes. This sentiment reflects broader concerns about how increased sales tax rates could impact local municipalities, potentially pushing them into higher tax brackets.

The survey also highlighted a strong community interest in transitioning to a paid firefighter model. However, residents questioned the associated costs and expressed a need for more education on why these expenses are necessary, particularly regarding service calls on Interstate 70. Many respondents suggested that state or federal agencies should bear some of these costs, indicating a disconnect between community expectations and the realities of funding emergency services.

In summary, the meeting underscored the importance of ongoing communication and education between local government and residents. While the survey results indicate a solid foundation of trust in county leadership, they also reveal critical areas for improvement, particularly in addressing community concerns about taxation and emergency services funding. As the county moves forward, it will be essential to engage residents in discussions about these issues to foster a collaborative approach to local governance.