H.B. 372 expands teledentistry services for comprehensive dental care in public health settings

On January 30, 2025, Utah lawmakers introduced H.B. 372, a legislative bill aimed at modernizing dental practice regulations, particularly through the integration of teledentistry. The bill seeks to expand the scope of dental services that can be provided remotely, addressing the growing demand for accessible dental care in the state.

Key provisions of H.B. 372 include allowing dentists to conduct examinations, diagnoses, and treatments via telehealth methods. This includes the ability to take patient histories, make dental impressions, and prescribe therapies for various oral health conditions. The bill also permits dentists to administer anesthetics and prescribe medications relevant to dental care, provided they hold the necessary permits.

The introduction of this bill comes amid ongoing discussions about the accessibility of dental services, especially in rural areas where dental professionals are scarce. Proponents argue that teledentistry can bridge the gap in care, making it easier for patients to receive timely treatment without the need for extensive travel. Additionally, the bill outlines specific settings where dental services can be provided, including schools, nursing homes, and community health centers, further emphasizing its focus on public health.

However, the bill has sparked debates among dental professionals and public health advocates. Some express concerns about the quality of care that can be delivered remotely, particularly for complex dental issues that may require in-person evaluations. Others worry that the expansion of teledentistry could lead to a decrease in traditional dental visits, potentially impacting the overall patient-dentist relationship.

Economically, H.B. 372 could have significant implications for the dental industry in Utah. By facilitating remote consultations, it may reduce overhead costs for dental practices and increase patient volume. However, the potential for increased competition among dental providers could also reshape the market dynamics.

As the bill progresses through the legislative process, its future remains uncertain. Stakeholders are closely monitoring discussions, with some advocating for amendments to ensure patient safety and care quality. The outcome of H.B. 372 could set a precedent for how dental care is delivered in Utah and potentially influence similar legislative efforts in other states.