Representative Mangold sponsors bill to clarify landowner immunity for recreational land use
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
Mississippi landowners may soon enjoy enhanced legal protections when allowing recreational use of their properties, thanks to House Bill 104, introduced by Representative Mangold on January 10, 2025. This legislation aims to clarify and expand the immunity provisions for landowners, encouraging more individuals to open their land for public recreational activities.
The bill proposes amendments to existing statutes, specifically Section 89-2-1 of the Mississippi Code, which currently provides limited immunity for landowners. The new provisions will explicitly include off-road vehicles and all-terrain vehicles as recognized recreational activities, broadening the scope of permissible uses. This change is expected to promote outdoor activities and increase public access to recreational spaces across the state.
Key discussions surrounding the bill have highlighted its potential to boost local economies by attracting outdoor enthusiasts and fostering tourism. Supporters argue that by reducing liability concerns, more landowners will be willing to share their properties for recreational purposes, ultimately benefiting communities through increased activity and engagement in outdoor sports.
However, the bill has faced some opposition. Critics express concerns that expanding immunity could lead to negligence, as landowners might feel less accountable for maintaining safe conditions on their properties. Proponents counter that the bill includes necessary safeguards to ensure that landowners remain responsible for gross negligence or willful misconduct.
As the bill progresses through the legislative process, its implications could be significant for Mississippi's outdoor recreation landscape. If passed, House Bill 104 may not only enhance landowner protections but also encourage a culture of shared outdoor experiences, potentially transforming how residents and visitors engage with the state's natural resources. The legislature's decision on this bill will be closely watched, as it could set a precedent for similar initiatives in other states.
The bill proposes amendments to existing statutes, specifically Section 89-2-1 of the Mississippi Code, which currently provides limited immunity for landowners. The new provisions will explicitly include off-road vehicles and all-terrain vehicles as recognized recreational activities, broadening the scope of permissible uses. This change is expected to promote outdoor activities and increase public access to recreational spaces across the state.
Key discussions surrounding the bill have highlighted its potential to boost local economies by attracting outdoor enthusiasts and fostering tourism. Supporters argue that by reducing liability concerns, more landowners will be willing to share their properties for recreational purposes, ultimately benefiting communities through increased activity and engagement in outdoor sports.
However, the bill has faced some opposition. Critics express concerns that expanding immunity could lead to negligence, as landowners might feel less accountable for maintaining safe conditions on their properties. Proponents counter that the bill includes necessary safeguards to ensure that landowners remain responsible for gross negligence or willful misconduct.
As the bill progresses through the legislative process, its implications could be significant for Mississippi's outdoor recreation landscape. If passed, House Bill 104 may not only enhance landowner protections but also encourage a culture of shared outdoor experiences, potentially transforming how residents and visitors engage with the state's natural resources. The legislature's decision on this bill will be closely watched, as it could set a precedent for similar initiatives in other states.
View Bill
This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution
View Bill