Connecticut's House Bill 6777, introduced on January 29, 2025, aims to streamline the process for water companies to implement surcharges related to water quality and treatment improvements. The bill seeks to address ongoing concerns about water quality management and the financial implications for both water companies and consumers.

Key provisions of the bill include a requirement for water companies to submit an updated water quality and treatment assessment report alongside their surcharge applications. This report must detail significant changes in capital spending on water quality projects planned for the next decade. Additionally, companies are mandated to provide a detailed capital spending plan for the three years following their application.

The bill also establishes a timeline for the authority to review these applications, stipulating that decisions must be made within 120 days. If the authority fails to make a decision within this timeframe, the water company can implement the surcharge, with a provision for refunds to customers if the surcharge exceeds what is ultimately approved.

Debate surrounding House Bill 6777 has focused on the balance between ensuring adequate funding for water quality improvements and protecting consumers from excessive charges. Some lawmakers express concern that allowing companies to impose surcharges before a decision is made could lead to financial strain on households, particularly in economically vulnerable communities.

Economically, the bill could facilitate necessary investments in water infrastructure, potentially leading to improved public health outcomes. However, it also raises questions about the long-term financial impact on consumers, especially if surcharges become a regular occurrence.

As the bill progresses through the legislative process, stakeholders from both the water industry and consumer advocacy groups are expected to weigh in, highlighting the need for transparency and accountability in how water quality improvements are funded. The outcome of this bill could set a precedent for how water quality issues are managed in Connecticut, influencing both policy and public perception of water utility practices.