Senate Bill 2705, introduced in the Mississippi Legislature on January 23, 2025, aims to establish a regulatory framework for genetic counselors in the state. Titled the Mississippi Genetic Counselor Practice Act, the bill seeks to ensure that individuals practicing genetic counseling are properly licensed and adhere to defined professional standards.

The key provisions of the bill include the requirement for genetic counselors to obtain a license from the State Board of Health by January 1, 2026. This licensing process will involve meeting minimum qualifications and completing continuing education requirements. The bill also prohibits individuals from presenting themselves as genetic counselors unless they hold a valid license. Additionally, it allows for reciprocal licensure for counselors licensed in other states and provides for provisional licenses for candidates who meet specific criteria.

The legislation addresses growing concerns about the qualifications and practices of genetic counselors, particularly as genetic testing becomes more prevalent in healthcare. By regulating this profession, the bill aims to protect patients and ensure that they receive accurate and reliable genetic counseling services.

Notably, the bill has sparked discussions among healthcare professionals and lawmakers regarding the implications of such regulation. Supporters argue that licensing will enhance the quality of care and safeguard public health, while opponents express concerns about potential barriers to entry for qualified professionals and the impact on access to genetic counseling services.

The Mississippi Council of Advisors in Genetic Counseling will be established under the bill to provide guidance on the administration and interpretation of its provisions. The Board will also have the authority to investigate complaints, impose penalties for violations, and seek injunctive relief against unlicensed practice.

As the bill progresses through the legislative process, its potential impact on the healthcare landscape in Mississippi remains a focal point of debate. If enacted, it could set a precedent for similar regulations in other states, reflecting a broader trend toward professional oversight in the rapidly evolving field of genetic counseling.