New York Senate proposes ban on police use of auditory dispersal tools
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
On January 8, 2025, New York Senate Bill 1095 was introduced, aiming to amend the executive law concerning the use of sustained auditory dispersal tools by law enforcement agencies. The bill, sponsored by Senators Ramos, Comrie, Hoylman-Sigal, Jackson, Krueger, Rivera, Salazar, and Sepulveda, seeks to establish a written policy that prohibits police from employing devices that emit high-decibel sounds capable of causing hearing loss or other harmful effects.
The bill defines "sustained auditory dispersal tools" as any long-range acoustic devices, sonic weapons, or high-powered sound magnifiers that produce sounds exceeding ninety decibels for extended periods. Notably, the legislation excludes devices used for verbal communication at or below this threshold, provided they are operated by trained personnel in accordance with health and safety standards.
Key provisions of the bill include the establishment of a civil action for individuals subjected to these auditory tools in violation of the proposed policy. This provision allows affected individuals to sue the employing agency of the law enforcement officer responsible for the misuse.
The introduction of Senate Bill 1095 has sparked discussions regarding the implications of using such devices in policing. Proponents argue that the bill addresses public safety concerns and the potential for abuse of sound-based crowd control methods, particularly in light of recent protests and civil unrest. Critics, however, may raise concerns about the limitations it places on law enforcement's ability to manage large gatherings effectively.
As the bill progresses through the legislative process, it will be reviewed by the Committee on Codes, where further debates and potential amendments may occur. The outcome of this bill could have significant implications for law enforcement practices in New York, particularly regarding the balance between public safety and individual rights. The ongoing discussions surrounding the bill reflect broader societal concerns about policing methods and the protection of civil liberties.
The bill defines "sustained auditory dispersal tools" as any long-range acoustic devices, sonic weapons, or high-powered sound magnifiers that produce sounds exceeding ninety decibels for extended periods. Notably, the legislation excludes devices used for verbal communication at or below this threshold, provided they are operated by trained personnel in accordance with health and safety standards.
Key provisions of the bill include the establishment of a civil action for individuals subjected to these auditory tools in violation of the proposed policy. This provision allows affected individuals to sue the employing agency of the law enforcement officer responsible for the misuse.
The introduction of Senate Bill 1095 has sparked discussions regarding the implications of using such devices in policing. Proponents argue that the bill addresses public safety concerns and the potential for abuse of sound-based crowd control methods, particularly in light of recent protests and civil unrest. Critics, however, may raise concerns about the limitations it places on law enforcement's ability to manage large gatherings effectively.
As the bill progresses through the legislative process, it will be reviewed by the Committee on Codes, where further debates and potential amendments may occur. The outcome of this bill could have significant implications for law enforcement practices in New York, particularly regarding the balance between public safety and individual rights. The ongoing discussions surrounding the bill reflect broader societal concerns about policing methods and the protection of civil liberties.
View Bill
This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution
View Bill