Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

New Hampshire mandates insurance coverage for diabetes monitoring devices and insulin prescriptions

January 23, 2025 | Introduced, House, 2025 Bills, New Hampshire Legislation Bills, New Hampshire


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

New Hampshire mandates insurance coverage for diabetes monitoring devices and insulin prescriptions
In the bustling halls of the New Hampshire State House, lawmakers gathered on January 23, 2025, to introduce House Bill 648, a significant piece of legislation aimed at transforming diabetes care for residents across the state. As the bill was presented, it became clear that its primary focus is to enhance insurance coverage for diabetes management, ensuring that individuals living with this chronic condition have access to essential medical equipment and educational services.

House Bill 648 mandates that all health insurers providing accident or health insurance in New Hampshire must cover medically necessary diabetes equipment, including traditional blood glucose monitors and continuous glucose monitoring systems (CGMS). This coverage extends to necessary supplies such as sensors, transmitters, and test strips, without imposing deductibles or prior authorization requirements. Notably, the bill also eliminates the need for endocrinology referrals, streamlining access to critical diabetes management tools.

One of the bill's key provisions is the introduction of a copayment cap for insulin prescriptions, limiting out-of-pocket expenses to no more than $30 for a 30-day supply. This measure aims to alleviate the financial burden on patients who rely on insulin, a life-saving medication for many with diabetes. Additionally, the bill emphasizes the importance of ongoing patient care, requiring individuals to engage in follow-up consultations with healthcare practitioners to assess the effectiveness of their glucose monitoring.

While the bill has garnered support from various health advocacy groups, it has not been without its critics. Some opponents argue that the legislation could lead to increased insurance premiums, as insurers may pass on the costs associated with expanded coverage to consumers. Others express concern about the potential for overutilization of resources, questioning whether all patients will genuinely benefit from the mandated services.

Experts in the field of diabetes care have weighed in on the bill's implications, highlighting its potential to improve health outcomes for individuals with diabetes. By facilitating access to necessary monitoring tools and education, the legislation could empower patients to take control of their health, ultimately reducing long-term complications associated with the disease.

As House Bill 648 moves through the legislative process, its fate remains uncertain. However, its introduction marks a pivotal moment in New Hampshire's approach to diabetes care, reflecting a growing recognition of the need for comprehensive support for those living with this chronic condition. The outcome of this bill could set a precedent for similar initiatives across the nation, as states grapple with the challenges of managing chronic diseases in an increasingly complex healthcare landscape.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New Hampshire articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI