Oregon lawmakers introduce bill mandating pay for on-call and standby employee hours

Oregon House Bill 2787, introduced on January 13, 2025, aims to enhance employee rights by mandating compensation for time spent on call or standby. Sponsored by Representative Nelson and Senator Manning Jr., the bill addresses the growing concern over the lack of pay for employees who are required to be available for work but are not actively engaged in their duties.

The key provisions of the bill require employers to compensate employees for on-call time when they must be ready to report to work within 90 minutes of being contacted. This compensation must be at least the federal minimum wage, regardless of whether the employee is ultimately called to work. Additionally, the bill mandates that employers post work schedules at least 14 days in advance, including all on-call and standby shifts, and prohibits changes to these schedules without the employee's consent.

The introduction of House Bill 2787 has sparked discussions among lawmakers and stakeholders regarding its implications for both employees and employers. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step toward fair labor practices, ensuring that employees are compensated for their availability and can plan their personal lives accordingly. Critics, however, express concerns about the potential financial burden on small businesses and the administrative challenges of complying with the new scheduling requirements.

The bill's passage could have significant social and economic implications, particularly for industries that rely heavily on on-call labor, such as healthcare and hospitality. Experts suggest that while the bill may increase operational costs for some employers, it could also lead to improved employee morale and retention, ultimately benefiting the workforce and the economy.

As the legislative session progresses, House Bill 2787 will likely continue to be a focal point of debate, with potential amendments and discussions on its impact on the state's labor market. The outcome of this bill could set a precedent for similar legislation in other states, reflecting a broader movement toward enhanced worker protections across the nation.