Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Senator Avard introduces New Hampshire bill for insurance notice requirements on Medicare plans

January 22, 2025 | Introduced, Senate, 2025 Bills, New Hampshire Legislation Bills, New Hampshire


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Senator Avard introduces New Hampshire bill for insurance notice requirements on Medicare plans
In a move aimed at enhancing transparency in the insurance sector, New Hampshire's Senate has introduced Senate Bill 121, which mandates insurance companies to notify the state’s insurance department before discontinuing certain types of insurance, including Medicare Advantage Plans. The bill, sponsored by Senator Kevin Avard, was presented on January 22, 2025, and is currently under review by the Health and Human Services Committee.

The primary purpose of SB 121 is to ensure that both the insurance department and consumers are adequately informed about significant changes in insurance offerings. Specifically, the bill requires insurance companies to provide a 120-day notice before ceasing an entire line of business or making substantial modifications to Medicare Advantage Plans. This provision aims to protect policyholders by allowing them time to seek alternative coverage options, particularly in the case of Medicare Advantage, which is vital for many seniors in the state.

Supporters of the bill argue that it addresses a critical gap in consumer protection, especially as the healthcare landscape continues to evolve. By requiring advance notice, the legislation seeks to prevent sudden disruptions in coverage that could leave vulnerable populations without necessary health services. The bill is a direct response to requests from the insurance department, highlighting the need for better oversight in the insurance market.

However, the bill has not been without its critics. Some insurance industry representatives have expressed concerns that the requirement could impose additional administrative burdens on companies, potentially leading to increased costs that may be passed on to consumers. Debates surrounding the bill are expected as it moves through the legislative process, with discussions likely focusing on balancing consumer protection with the operational realities of insurance providers.

The implications of SB 121 extend beyond regulatory compliance; they touch on the broader issues of healthcare accessibility and consumer rights in New Hampshire. If passed, the bill could set a precedent for how insurance companies communicate changes to their offerings, fostering a more transparent relationship between insurers and the public.

As the legislative session progresses, stakeholders from various sectors will be watching closely to see how this bill evolves and what it could mean for the future of insurance in New Hampshire. The outcome may significantly impact how residents navigate their insurance options, particularly for those relying on Medicare Advantage Plans.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New Hampshire articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI