On December 18, 2024, the Florida State Legislature introduced House Bill 65, aimed at regulating the sale, transfer, and storage of firearms. The bill seeks to address concerns regarding firearm accessibility, particularly for prohibited users and minors, by mandating secure storage practices.

The primary provision of HB 65 requires individuals who know or should reasonably know that a prohibited user may gain access to their firearm to store it in a securely locked box or container, or to use a trigger lock. This requirement is waived only when the firearm is carried on the person or within immediate reach. A "prohibited user" is defined as anyone legally barred from possessing a firearm under state or federal law.

Violations of this storage requirement are classified as misdemeanors of the second degree. Notably, if a violation results in a prohibited user or a minor accessing the firearm, the penalties could be more severe, reflecting the bill's intent to enhance accountability among firearm owners.

The introduction of HB 65 has sparked significant debate among lawmakers and advocacy groups. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step toward preventing gun violence and ensuring public safety, particularly in households with children. Critics, however, contend that the bill may infringe on Second Amendment rights and place undue burdens on responsible gun owners.

The economic implications of HB 65 could also be noteworthy, as increased storage requirements may lead to higher costs for firearm owners who need to purchase secure storage solutions. Socially, the bill reflects a growing concern over gun safety in Florida, a state with a high rate of firearm ownership and associated incidents.

As the legislative process unfolds, experts suggest that the bill's fate will depend on the balance between public safety interests and individual rights. If passed, HB 65 could set a precedent for similar legislation in other states, potentially reshaping the landscape of firearm regulation in the United States. The next steps will involve committee reviews and potential amendments as lawmakers continue to navigate this contentious issue.