Senate Bill 340, introduced in Maryland on January 16, 2025, aims to enhance consumer protections in the realm of internet gaming by addressing issues related to problem gambling. The bill proposes several key provisions designed to empower account holders and mitigate the risks associated with online gambling.

One of the primary features of Senate Bill 340 is the establishment of a framework that allows account holders to suspend their internet gaming activities for a minimum of 72 hours. During this suspension, gaming licensees are prohibited from sending any gaming-related electronic communications to the account holder, ensuring a clear separation during the self-imposed break. Additionally, the bill mandates that account holders have the ability to periodically change their gaming controls, although any changes cannot be made while a suspension is in effect.

Another significant aspect of the bill is the regulation surrounding the increase of deposit limits. If an individual wishes to raise their deposit limit, the gaming licensee must enforce a 24-hour waiting period before reflecting this increase, providing a buffer to reconsider the decision.

Senate Bill 340 also addresses the issue of problem gambling more broadly. It requires the Maryland Gaming Commission to adopt regulations aimed at reducing the effects of gambling addiction. This includes the creation of a voluntary exclusion list for individuals who wish to be barred from participating in internet gaming activities. The bill outlines a straightforward process for individuals to request placement on this list, ensuring that those struggling with gambling can take proactive steps to protect themselves.

The introduction of this bill has sparked discussions among lawmakers and stakeholders about the balance between consumer freedom and the need for protective measures in the gambling industry. Supporters argue that these provisions are essential for safeguarding vulnerable individuals, while opponents may raise concerns about the potential impact on the gaming industry’s revenue.

As the bill progresses through the legislative process, its implications could extend beyond individual protections, potentially influencing the broader conversation about responsible gambling practices in Maryland. If passed, Senate Bill 340 could set a precedent for similar legislation in other states, reflecting a growing recognition of the need for enhanced consumer safeguards in the rapidly evolving landscape of online gaming.