Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Michigan lawmakers propose cash payment requirement for tolls on public infrastructure

January 15, 2025 | 2025 Introduced House Bills, 2025 Bills, Michigan Legislation Bills, Michigan


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Michigan lawmakers propose cash payment requirement for tolls on public infrastructure
A new legislative push in Michigan is stirring debate as House Bill No. 4015, dubbed the "Cash for Tolls Act," seeks to mandate cash payments for tolls on state-owned infrastructure. Introduced on January 9, 2025, by a bipartisan group of representatives, the bill aims to ensure that all tolls on bridges, highways, and tunnels can be paid in cash, eliminating the requirement for electronic or card payments.

The bill's proponents argue that it promotes accessibility and fairness, particularly for those who may not have access to credit cards or digital payment methods. "Everyone should have the right to use our roads without being forced into a cashless system," said Rep. Slagh, one of the bill's sponsors. Supporters believe this move could alleviate concerns about exclusion and ensure that all citizens can travel freely across Michigan's infrastructure.

However, the proposal has faced criticism from some quarters. Opponents argue that requiring cash payments could slow down toll collection processes, leading to longer wait times and increased congestion. Additionally, there are concerns about the safety and practicality of handling cash in toll booths, especially in a post-pandemic world where contactless transactions have become the norm.

The bill has been referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, where it will undergo further scrutiny. If passed, it could have significant implications for how tolls are managed in Michigan, potentially setting a precedent for other states considering similar legislation. As the discussion unfolds, the balance between accessibility and efficiency remains at the forefront of this legislative debate.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Michigan articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI