Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Delegate Cardin proposes Maryland bill to tackle electronic harassment and bullying among youth

March 04, 2024 | House (Introduced), 2024 Bills, Maryland Legislation Bills Collections, Maryland



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Delegate Cardin proposes Maryland bill to tackle electronic harassment and bullying among youth
Maryland's House Bill 31, introduced on March 4, 2024, aims to tackle the growing issue of electronic harassment and bullying among juveniles. Proposed by Delegate Cardin, the bill mandates that intake officers from the Department of Juvenile Services must forward complaints related to the misuse of electronic communication to the State’s Attorney under specific circumstances. This legislative move seeks to enhance the accountability of juvenile offenders and provide a clearer pathway for addressing digital misconduct.

The bill's key provisions focus on the responsibilities of juvenile intake officers, ensuring that serious allegations involving electronic harassment are not overlooked. By requiring these officers to escalate certain cases, the legislation aims to strengthen the legal framework surrounding juvenile justice in the digital age.

Debate surrounding House Bill 31 has highlighted concerns about the implications of increased legal scrutiny on young individuals. Advocates argue that the bill is a necessary step to protect victims and deter harmful online behavior, while opponents caution that it may lead to over-policing of youth and potential stigmatization. Amendments to the bill have been proposed to clarify the circumstances under which complaints must be forwarded, reflecting ongoing discussions about balancing accountability with the rights of minors.

The implications of this bill extend beyond the courtroom. If passed, it could reshape how electronic harassment cases are handled in Maryland, potentially influencing similar legislative efforts in other states. Experts suggest that the bill could serve as a model for addressing the complexities of juvenile behavior in an increasingly digital world, emphasizing the need for a nuanced approach to youth justice.

As House Bill 31 moves through the legislative process, its fate remains uncertain. However, its introduction marks a significant step in Maryland's efforts to confront the challenges posed by electronic harassment and bullying, signaling a commitment to protecting young people in the digital landscape.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Maryland articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI