Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

House Bill 661 targets unfair debt collection practices to protect consumers

March 14, 2024 | House (Introduced), 2024 Bills, Maryland Legislation Bills Collections, Maryland



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

House Bill 661 targets unfair debt collection practices to protect consumers
Maryland's House Bill 661 aims to tighten regulations on debt collection practices, addressing growing concerns over unfair and abusive tactics used by collectors. Introduced on March 14, 2024, the bill seeks to amend existing commercial law to enhance consumer protections and ensure ethical conduct in debt collection.

At the heart of House Bill 661 is a clear definition of "unfair, abusive, or deceptive trade practices," which now explicitly includes violations related to consumer transactions. This includes provisions that prohibit collectors from using threats of violence, disclosing false information about a debtor's creditworthiness, or contacting employers about debts without a final judgment. These measures are designed to safeguard consumers from aggressive and potentially harmful collection methods.

The bill has sparked notable discussions among lawmakers and consumer advocacy groups. Proponents argue that the legislation is essential for protecting vulnerable consumers from predatory practices that can lead to financial distress and reputational harm. Critics, however, express concerns about the potential burden on legitimate debt collection agencies, fearing that stringent regulations could hinder their ability to recover debts effectively.

The implications of House Bill 661 extend beyond consumer protection; they also touch on broader economic and social issues. By reinforcing ethical standards in debt collection, the bill aims to foster a fairer marketplace, potentially reducing the financial strain on families and individuals struggling with debt. Experts suggest that if passed, the bill could lead to a significant shift in how debt collection is approached in Maryland, setting a precedent for other states to follow.

As the legislative process unfolds, stakeholders are closely monitoring the bill's progress, anticipating amendments and further debates that could shape its final form. The outcome of House Bill 661 could redefine the landscape of consumer rights in Maryland, making it a pivotal moment for both consumers and the debt collection industry.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Maryland articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI