Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

House Bill 1233 shields hospitals from liability over abortion and sterilization referrals

March 15, 2024 | House (Introduced), 2024 Bills, Maryland Legislation Bills Collections, Maryland



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

$99/year $199 LIFETIME

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches & alerts • County, city, state & federal

Full Videos
Transcripts
Unlimited Searches
Real-Time Alerts
AI Summaries
Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots • 30-day guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

House Bill 1233 shields hospitals from liability over abortion and sterilization referrals
On March 15, 2024, the Maryland Legislature introduced House Bill 1233, a significant piece of legislation that addresses the rights of healthcare providers and institutions regarding certain medical procedures, specifically artificial insemination, sterilization, and termination of pregnancy. The bill aims to clarify the legal protections for hospitals and healthcare professionals who choose not to participate in these procedures based on personal or institutional beliefs.

Key provisions of House Bill 1233 include the stipulation that licensed hospitals, their directors, and governing boards are not required to allow the performance of artificial insemination, sterilization, or abortion within their facilities. Furthermore, they are not obligated to refer patients to other sources for these procedures. The bill also ensures that such refusals cannot be grounds for civil liability or disciplinary action against the healthcare providers or institutions involved.

The legislation also addresses individual rights, stating that a person's refusal to consent to an abortion or sterilization cannot result in the loss of privileges or public benefits. However, it includes a critical caveat: healthcare providers may still face civil liability if their refusal to refer a patient leads to serious injury or death, provided that such outcomes are deemed contrary to accepted medical standards.

Debate surrounding House Bill 1233 has been intense, with proponents arguing that it protects the conscience rights of healthcare providers and institutions. Critics, however, express concern that the bill could limit access to essential reproductive health services, particularly for vulnerable populations who may rely on hospitals for care. The potential implications of this legislation are significant, as it could reshape the landscape of reproductive health services in Maryland, influencing both patient access and provider responsibilities.

As the bill progresses through the legislative process, experts anticipate that it will spark further discussions about the balance between personal beliefs and patient rights in healthcare. The bill is set to take effect on October 1, 2024, pending further legislative action and potential amendments. The outcome of this bill could have lasting effects on healthcare practices and reproductive rights in the state, making it a focal point for ongoing debates in Maryland and beyond.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Maryland articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI