[{"_1":2,"_87":-5,"_88":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6357926,"mediaKeyId","2213166-89a49be11654c1ea38ca43dc333f19e2","parentId",2213166,"title","Wolf Lake Ranch Phase 2 DRC review: density under 2 units/acre when combined with Phase 1; amenities, access and easements discussed","audioSeconds",637,"startMs",669000,"endMs",1306000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2213166-89a49be11654c1ea38ca43dc333f19e2&start=669&end=1306","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2213166-89a49be11654c1ea38ca43dc333f19e2/thumbnail_669000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6357926/Apopka/Orange-County/Florida/Wolf-Lake-Ranch-Phase-2-DRC-review-density-under-2-unitsacre-when-combined-with-Phase-1-amenities-access-and-easements-discussed","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6357926-5d9ded77e2fa700fced4da371512014d/orig.mp4?Expires=1775403076&Signature=g7uLx~lufOp-AoSJBI8medDQqSXxJoFS-5qF88TKXEx0Pl9DleGhIjzdp4qc4LjIaDUJR-0nK3nl0QF~FFk~ceKX5OhKyHZin-4~NLsv5YVaSWaDSsM7YQ~Bz4okjW6tcF9Xr3SHV-inxyBYfEP6K53-DIzasZoGKZEUH0A27INgjO6~Nm3t~GcWqhbUTTXq5fuZMd52U2-Z4oby8jte9~kZX5RN8E5StzcGP4xKfqwA1G7mfBZqBtij1hOG8vGJO4VYtkhXytP0C9rzvWKDmnO7sLbb~1V6oMiAof6nBg1QNzyE7d6QzdCckRS3~91O0tzNNSh1aRPAgc45FPsiPQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","City of Apopka, FL","date","2025-01-30T02:23:38Z","article","Apopka staff and the applicant discussed Wolf Lake Ranch Phase 2 on Jan. 29; the project comprises roughly 29.94 acres across three parcels north of Ponkan Road and proposes about 60 lots as part of a continuation of the Phase 1 subdivision.

Jean Sanchez, project manager, asked for a clear demonstration that overall density does not exceed two dwelling units per acre. Sanchez said staff expected the applicant to show whether the developable acreage and lot yields across phases combined comply with the 2‑du/acre limit.

The applicant representative (Luke) said the developer will combine Phase 1 and Phase 2 for the density calculation and replat the parcels so the combined site remains below two dwelling units per acre. \"We're combining the phase 2 with the phase 1, and, we're, we're taking out 1 of the lots in the south on the phase 1. And so we're getting that lot back, but we're still under the 2 dwelling units breaker for the combined acreage,\" the applicant said. He added the team will provide a combined density breakdown in the resubmittal and that a replat will reflect the changes.

Planning staff and committee members discussed amenities and access. The applicant said Phase 1 already includes a playground and a parkour course; Phase 2 will be incorporated into a single homeowners association and may include an outdoor movie screen and an outdoor kitchen area for residents. The project is planned as a private, gated subdivision; the applicant said community movie nights would be for HOA members only.

Emergency access and gates were a focus. Staff and the applicant discussed establishing a second access point and whether to relocate an existing crash gate to the new access. Public services and fire staff noted paving and design details for the new emergency connection and agreed the existing crash gate at Ponkan Pines could be removed once the new access is functional.

Committee members also clarified an existing private ingress/egress easement that serves five residences on a northwest corner parcel; the applicant said that easement will remain as a private, existing easement and will be shown on the plat.

No formal action or vote took place; staff will provide written comments and the applicant will submit a replat and revised materials documenting combined density calculations, access changes, and amenity plans.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","City of Apopka Development Review Committee January 29, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The committee reviewed Wolf Lake Ranch Phase 2 (about 30 acres, 60 lots), discussed density calculations across phases, planned amenities (playground, parkour course, outdoor movie area), emergency access and a private ingress/egress easement for five existing homes.","taxTitle","Apopka, Orange County, Florida","taxId",4597,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6357931,"DRC reviews OnDeck South plan for 326 rear‑loaded homes; fire asks for hydrant GPS",516,131000,647000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2213166-89a49be11654c1ea38ca43dc333f19e2&start=131&end=647","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2213166-89a49be11654c1ea38ca43dc333f19e2/thumbnail_131000.jpg","/articles/6357931/Apopka/Orange-County/Florida/DRC-reviews-OnDeck-South-plan-for-326-rearloaded-homes-fire-asks-for-hydrant-GPS","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6357931-68d74d303a7568e3bfe42eec4870da88/orig.mp4?Expires=1775403076&Signature=oKLU9iCO2OPNVqGr5yHVDszFL68rMAHyC4PG4dZp19YNakXVaW3m3Fpfm8PdE~X0XX4JoH~8V1UKx~grhf3grvcMUaRO-XtcN93dmzfn4yGCnvZSW9MIJo-PmAUK20EKuAThQMaSfGfchecL~4RCVuoQT8xn9M19nlqkqDs-N5QJRACoeZPNCkZ8qET05FJ0gAuOUBqNMt4OFWmgF9T~FasK3K1fCqN3BMKYoD5hhy9JvEmKwOl9gNdtbBKqmGKKhdRdi5ErkpA27YFAP80oS9GQ~jtZLYrDeJ76F5F~1n3k2o-V2~loFYESXkh39F3yBcdLg94kR5kSftjWyHgQqw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Apopka Development Review Committee on Jan. 29 reviewed the OnDeck South major development plan, a proposal for 326 rear‑loaded townhomes and detached single‑family residences on 54.85 acres at the southwest corner of Andich and Effie Drive.

Jean Sanchez, project manager, told the committee the site is within the Kelly Park interchange form‑based code in the transition and neighborhood overlay districts and that staff had several technical and housekeeping comments from multiple departments. \"If you recall, this is within our Kelly Park interchange form based code under transition and neighborhood overlay districts,\" Sanchez said.

The committee and applicant discussed several technical items staff flagged. Fire staff asked the applicant to provide GPS coordinates for every hydrant prior to final approval; Fire Department representative Jeremy Holderfield said, \"prior to you guys getting approval of your site, when I get my hydrants and my cleared and all that stuff, I'm gonna need GPS coordinates for each hydrants,\" and indicated he preferred receiving those as part of water‑clearance documentation.

Staff noted a design correction to an auto‑turn dimension (previously listed as 47.1 feet and corrected to 47.65 feet), and planning staff asked that a north–south segment of an on‑site trail be widened from 8 feet to 10 feet so it consistently connects to the adjacent Crossroads development, which has a 10‑foot trail.

Lighting and alley design were discussed but not decided. Staff said the development standards require street lighting in alleyways and that each home would face a named street and use an alley for rear access. Committee members and staff debated whether homeowner‑controlled building lighting could be switched off and whether that would undermine alley illumination; the issue will be addressed through final design and utility coordination.

The applicant reported coordination with Duke Energy on pole design, including the possibility of an extension arm to push luminaires away from alleys so emergency and refuse vehicles have better clearance. The applicant also said turn lanes for the intersections at Effie and OnDeck are shown on plans and will be submitted to Orange County for review. \"We're submitting those to Orange County,\" the applicant said; staff noted county jurisdiction questions had been clarified and that the team will prepare submittals to the county.

The applicant intends to dedicate a 20‑foot right of way along Effie to accommodate a future sidewalk; most immediate roadway improvements will fit within the existing right of way but the dedication supports long‑term expansion.

No formal vote or city decision occurred; the meeting record shows only departmental comments and coordination items. Staff said written comments will be provided to the applicant for revision and resubmittal.

Next steps: the applicant will address DRC comments (trail width, corrected auto‑turn data, hydrant GPS delivery, lighting/utility coordination and county turn‑lane submittal) and return revised plans; Orange County review is expected for the turn‑lane proposals.","City staff reviewed OnDeck South, a 326‑unit development on about 54.85 acres in the Kelly Park interchange area, and gave technical comments including a fire department request for GPS coordinates for each hydrant and traffic/utility coordination with adjacent Crossroads development.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Wolf Lake Ranch Phase 2 DRC review: density under 2 units/acre when combined with Phase 1; amenities, access and easements discussed

DRC reviews OnDeck South plan for 326 rear‑loaded homes; fire asks for hydrant GPS