Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Developer Coakley faces scrutiny over discrepancies in property development since 2005

February 22, 2024 | Woburn City, Middlesex County, Massachusetts



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Developer Coakley faces scrutiny over discrepancies in property development since 2005
The Woburn Conservation Commission meeting on February 22, 2024, focused on a review of discrepancies related to a property development project. The discussion highlighted concerns raised by Mister Farrell regarding minimal site variations that had not been addressed by the developer, Mister Coakley, since the project's inception in 2005.

Mister Farrell noted that while the discrepancies appear to be minor, they were significant enough to warrant attention. He emphasized that the original buyer, Miss Aviles, had not encountered any issues during her previous real estate transactions, except for the initial purchase when the property was still under development. He reassured the commission that all other conditions related to the property had been met, including the recording of a restrictive easement.

The commission members expressed their concerns, particularly about a substantial encroachment into a 15-foot no-disturb zone caused by a retaining wall on the right side of the duplex. This raised questions about compliance with conservation regulations.

Mister Farrell welcomed the opportunity for a site visit to address any further questions from the commission. The meeting underscored the importance of ensuring that all development projects adhere to conservation guidelines, particularly in sensitive areas. The commission will likely follow up with a site visit to assess the situation further.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Massachusetts articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI