[{"_1":2,"_100":-5,"_101":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6674970,"mediaKeyId","2214859-ae2a23bafc87b149768c09daa4d34e28","parentId",2214859,"title","Votes at a glance: Committee reports multiple bills; one pulled after member objections","audioSeconds",1044,"startMs",69000,"endMs",1113000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2214859-ae2a23bafc87b149768c09daa4d34e28&start=69&end=1113","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2214859-ae2a23bafc87b149768c09daa4d34e28/thumbnail_69000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6674970/New-York/Votes-at-a-glance-Committee-reports-multiple-bills-one-pulled-after-member-objections","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6674970-7d45269ed376dc5fa171af27c8f6d367/orig.mp4?Expires=1775217043&Signature=L-72cGpPMhnDaw4I-jRpEW4vKC6jJqaiwU6xcN9~4hyWE~BXoZp7U1-FdCsJxf~nXt8ako5EtqrTPcO61LQ4ITwyczK1n~GNGa-dix0rD65GvdxA8C5GiSrx6t-h8ae-mKWpspTAeH4kh5ynN4Vmt642K79Zkr2EwAhxhegrA8vyIlDv23PCm8KVdeqGgcJoAef6n1dnddsrYbe8HCCRbMFKrCkMFn4tzObXi1tVPIkVeecoQR2ZNBntut7yVQ1izhkJetI0x8cYOIteTfaId4yKxhi51M0qw1O4QgpMD~Toqv-ymRPDxUytQikztgsF~2YB-A9qtmUCGwHPusFLpw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","New York - Investigations And Government Operations","date","2025-02-03T18:01:46.487Z","article","The Senate Investigations and Government Operations Committee moved and reported a series of bills across several policy areas during its meeting. Most measures were acted on by voice vote and recorded in the transcript as \"All in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Without rec\" (indicating a committee report, in some cases noted \"without recommendation\" by the ranking member). S.408, a measure to allow airline lounges to limit day‑pass access, was pulled after substantive objections and will be revised by sponsors.

Key items reported from the meeting (as read in the transcript):

- S.52 (tax law) — reported out of committee.
- S.315 (Alcoholic Beverage Control Law) — establishing a temporary New York craft beverage permit — reported.
- S.333 (state arms and flag description) — reported (see separate story on debate).
- S.349 (Public Officers Law; standard definition of agency) — reported.
- S.365 (Alcoholic Beverage Control Law; brewers supply stores selling New York labeled beer for off‑premises consumption) — reported.
- S.408 (Alcoholic Beverage Control Law; retail liquor licenses at airline lounges) — pulled for further work after members raised access/equity concerns.
- S.566 (Executive Law; enrollment eligibility for election officials in the Address Confidentiality Program) — reported.
- S.567 (brand owner's license, Alcoholic Beverage Control Law) — reported.
- S.625 (tax law; timing of annual tax collections/SALT workarounds) — reported after member questions about schedule vs. credits.
- S.647 (Public Officers Law; expanding videoconferencing authorization for public bodies/committees) — reported.
- S.700 (tax law; enforcement of delinquent tax liabilities via special licenses to operate a motor vehicle) — reported; transcript records mixed individual notations (some members recorded 'no' or 'without rec').
- S.1787 (flag recognizing veteran suicide awareness) — reported.
- S.2271, S.2304, S.2364, S.2447, S.3274 and other items listed on the transcript — reported.

Many of these items were processed quickly and advanced to the next legislative step; where the transcript marks a member as opposed or records a \"without recommendation\" notation, that is noted in the committee record and will appear in subsequent published minutes.

Because the committee used voice votes for most measures, the transcript does not provide formal roll‑call tallies for each bill. Sponsors and committee staff may return with communications materials or revised text on bills that were pulled or that drew individual member objections.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Senate Standing Committee on Investigations and Government Operations - 02/03/2025","oneSentenceSummary","The Senate Investigations and Government Operations Committee considered a long consent list of bills and reported most forward (often by voice vote); a single bill (S.408) was pulled after members raised concerns about restricting lounge access. Reported items include tax, public‑officer, election‑related, and flag bills.","taxTitle","Investigations And Government Operations, Standing Committee, Senate, Legislative, New York","taxId",25206,"location","New York","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6674975,"Committee advances bill to describe state arms and flag after brief debate over recent redesign",148,109000,257000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2214859-ae2a23bafc87b149768c09daa4d34e28&start=109&end=257","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2214859-ae2a23bafc87b149768c09daa4d34e28/thumbnail_109000.jpg","/articles/6674975/New-York/Committee-advances-bill-to-describe-state-arms-and-flag-after-brief-debate-over-recent-redesign","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6674975-52a65ff9323f0da02012655dae836438/orig.mp4?Expires=1775217043&Signature=HYgAtf6ne9-lLgJo96DaKMevZHVF2prkEzSYad9KbV9~p-~gn0WZY83YSKCJvLL8PYLxl0uHKkkFATrOV7FwbE4w~xSkaHje8OZc-MhmOsHQBXusEyu1YPSc91z2xN50ww0wmNP9mJoen-AfARJWCga5GD3ds8p5tVj9KoMXx2oqYotNVmb2VKWufluh4StFmt0gYbp1U27Ozp-DI8fOzM9owFNKoPtofwFqqgWBC2dO8Inwb5dJdFQWrR-xGmdnBFYDnmqTXm~KoQGyEJ0aZRdCgFyjDv7H0E9LH0W7aviqA4OWaq4vZjXx1LZ5SbJnWRR33CHtvk9rdB3RtJ0fIw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Senate Investigations and Government Operations Committee reported S.333, a bill described in committee as amending state law to set the description of the arms of the state and the state flag. The bill was sponsored (as read in the transcript) by Senator Scoopis and brought questions from members about cost, symbolism and prior executive changes to the flag and seal.

Senator May asked what the bill would require to reverse recent changes to the flag and whether replacing current seals would impose a cost. Chair James Stupis replied that the change would not require tearing down existing seals and that replacements would occur through normal attrition, so there would be no direct replacement cost. May and other members noted they had observed the replacement of seals at some state buildings and questioned whether some had already been changed rather than waiting for attrition.

Committee members discussed why the flag redesign had occurred, with one remark attributing the change previously to the former governor's influence. The sponsor spoke briefly and the body proceeded to report the bill; the transcript records the committee reported the measure, with the notation that it was reported \"without rec\" (without recommendation) from Senator O'Mara.

The committee did not adopt further amendments on the floor. The bill moves forward to the next legislative step as a reported committee item.","The committee reported S.333, a measure that would amend state law describing the state arms and flag. Members debated whether removing recent changes is costly or symbolic; sponsors said replacement would occur by attrition and would not require tearing down existing seals.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6674980,"Committee pulls bill that would let airline lounges restrict day‑pass access to alcohol service",219,290000,509000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2214859-ae2a23bafc87b149768c09daa4d34e28&start=290&end=509","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2214859-ae2a23bafc87b149768c09daa4d34e28/thumbnail_290000.jpg","/articles/6674980/New-York/Committee-pulls-bill-that-would-let-airline-lounges-restrict-daypass-access-to-alcohol-service","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6674980-ad5dade1b048af93658b8ddb1ab8d273/orig.mp4?Expires=1775217043&Signature=mQo0FGV2LbMrCdll9LUZV7Cs6zYPdAgVgE8o2y9MTea-jyKQQaQiA5KTclXC9wwfSgfyTP76v9Acws8kWTOQ7Y-04dSvZ2P32izz5MA2qY6yWwLTNZNpfqFBBxbTDGa5WspPggEw-TuumtDyeToHuIqOZ41GeiPEb6hA8ZKswLCqdXB09Fv19g3cmGL8PPN6iMUm3DcTGlohiWFfmmlG2-DMAdW8OQ-qZpnh5n1QhMkx6iQ25ZSEX5A4Slm1ogpFmeScJC18qavCueEivC0-F~Ir0PwY6sbdSLbEbw78D-~gJ0CrozBl1zFsgQiGbuhS7DCjgTuG5Emv~mxZSl5q8A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Senate Investigations and Government Operations Committee on a motion withdrew S.408, a bill that would authorize retail liquor licenses for airline lounges and permit some lounges to operate without offering statutory day‑pass access to the general traveling public.

The bill, described to the committee as an amendment to New York's Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, would have allowed for‑profit airport lounges to limit access to members, credit‑card affiliates or certain ticketed customers rather than offering day passes. Evan Gallo, the committee clerk, told members that current statute effectively requires lounges to offer a day pass (he cited an example price of about $40.50). Committee members said in practice some lounges already operate more restrictively, and that the bill would formalize the option to close lounges to general day‑pass customers.

Senator May pressed on the policy implications, calling the proposal \"snobbish\" and saying it would further restrict access for travelers who need respite during delays. The senator and others argued that the change would remove an existing pathway for beleaguered or delayed travelers to access services that are otherwise available for a fee.

Senator Merrick and others asked procedural and statutory questions: committee members were told that nonprofit clubs may already obtain licenses that permit full exclusion of the public, while for‑profit licensees are presently required to offer some degree of public access (hence the day‑pass practice). Members also discussed how common practice in other states differs from New York's statutory requirement.

After questions and objections, the chair moved to pull the bill from consideration so sponsors could address committee concerns. No roll‑call vote on final passage was recorded; the transcript shows members agreed to remove the bill from the active agenda.

The bill was not advanced and will return to sponsors for further work or amendment before any future committee action.","The Senate Investigations and Government Operations Committee withdrew S.408 after members raised concerns that the bill would let for‑profit airline lounges exclude day‑pass purchasers and other nonmembers from spaces that now must offer limited public access under the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: Committee reports multiple bills; one pulled after member objections

Committee advances bill to describe state arms and flag after brief debate over recent redesign

Committee pulls bill that would let airline lounges restrict day‑pass access to alcohol service