[{"_1":2,"_123":-5,"_124":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99,111],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},"mediaId",6357442,"mediaKeyId","2215069-a51f8167fe3346c45529d40a9ad618ab","parentId",2215069,"title","Judge Boyd orders bond forfeitures and remands in multiple no-shows; court gives chance to reinstate if defendants appear","audioSeconds",3995,"startMs",5614000,"endMs",9609000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2215069-a51f8167fe3346c45529d40a9ad618ab&start=5614&end=9609","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2215069-a51f8167fe3346c45529d40a9ad618ab/thumbnail_5614000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6357442/Texas/Judge-Boyd-orders-bond-forfeitures-and-remands-in-multiple-no-shows-court-gives-chance-to-reinstate-if-defendants-appear","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6357442-e397e285d99de3e701995dec39800da2/orig.mp4?Expires=1770961609&Signature=TPKlv2rhsf4IzH1BEsMJWDI2wm94fwj4aFdmwtHA9gNPh~96KhzvG6WcKJcHl7dflmRf1VIRo~-FTx29BWp~Gu4DRyBshqbV5fx-l7vh4JPXQ8Gt5tlw5q83mVTBpq2HivIqUP0lJTV3dtdM7up~annwcjCIPcYRWy8lU55SkeWxu5UFNuGYAMW8qEK0jKVQ4ftyggbAhQrVMXsExK-sQaWlBeC0c4TPSAyTb4mmuz8-uuOmGO0F~797f3o9-yP16hmWPdEFNx5dPN2bYnYV~suWTy5aSTzCKpBMuGIml5NjAjpU2YiGaRVxjGmJcU9OlJ6~ud6zNGTeD-xx-V1zzA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","","date","2025-02-03T18:15:15Z","article","Judge Stephanie Boyd granted bond forfeiture and remanded several defendants without bond after they failed to appear for their docket calls, and directed prosecutors and defense counsel to follow local procedures for reinstatement if the defendants subsequently appear.

Key case outcomes

- Adam Adrian Herrera (2024 CR 012735): The defendant did not appear for a scheduled hearing; the court granted bond forfeiture and remanded him without bond. The judge said the court would reconsider if the defendant made an appearance.

- Gabriel Diaz (multiple case numbers 2024 CR 010128, 010131, 010149): The defendant failed to answer docket; the court granted bond forfeiture in each cause and remanded without bond; counsel said they had attempted to contact the defendant and the bondsman and would follow up.

- Several other docket calls included no-shows where the court instructed deputies and counsel to attempt notification, recall at 1:30 p.m. settings or proceed with bond forfeiture motions depending on counsel's preference and the specific case.

Court procedure and notes

Deputy Laura and defense counsel reported attempts to contact bondsmen and clients. The court emphasized the standard remedy for repeated failures to appear: bond forfeiture and issuance of a remand without bond, with the possibility of reconsideration if the defendant later appears and shows cause.

Ending

The court ordered the clerk to enter bond-forfeiture orders where applicable and to issue remands; judges said counsel could request reconsideration if their clients later appeared and showed good cause for the earlier absences.

","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","MON., FEB 3 2025/JUDGE STEPHANIE BOYD/187TH DISTRICT COURT/MORNING DOCKET","oneSentenceSummary","At Monday's docket call the court ordered bond forfeiture and remand without bond for several defendants who failed to appear, and in other matters authorized bond forfeiture proceedings or recall dates for counsel to locate clients.","taxTitle","Judge Stephanie Boyd 187th District, District Court Judges, Judicial, Texas","taxId",66298,"location","Texas","headline","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6357445,"Man pleads guilty to criminal mischief; court orders 199 days in county jail",354,8858000,9212000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2215069-a51f8167fe3346c45529d40a9ad618ab&start=8858&end=9212","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2215069-a51f8167fe3346c45529d40a9ad618ab/thumbnail_8858000.jpg","/articles/6357445/Texas/Man-pleads-guilty-to-criminal-mischief-court-orders-199-days-in-county-jail","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6357445-508c061e1166a5fa0eaf0e958c669617/orig.mp4?Expires=1770961609&Signature=RFVrdQCqRwz5S3bym9OAZS3M56ATPOvG2~4NazmFqQjUbSwHOSYpAClg40ozNHnJTTYh9dRSKKX6Lzn4bwtjq6R99canFeUYZHO0aMFk2XRmt1XcPYRWZos4T3L2F2DbwKydUsTGjNj4wHN56LvyZOS2s5eXYflPosGWpO3qtsutYntsuQEZw~gAEhDnrlEUNj~5qMU0of3HcUt1dOaK7eGCPQfhQBMZZ7FQVJ2X8e4dFSJBGIaKsbK7LV2S~q5WrHCUaryJ~imgBz~Fslb3EYIOzPnCMrADIh-lpmmXuZVX9YJKZt2cNgadv6iBuTIaJVl~mpTfEE7FxTYs6JGaIA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Charles Loring Wanless appeared before Judge Stephanie Boyd and pleaded guilty to a lesser-included offense of criminal mischief (class A misdemeanor). The court accepted the plea and sentenced Wanless to 199 days in the Bexar County Jail, with credit for time served; the parties stipulated to written statements and police reports rather than live testimony.

Court process and plea details

The state proceeded on the lesser-included misdemeanor (greater than $750 but less than $2,500) rather than the originally indicted state-jail felony. Defense counsel waived further objections and the court accepted written stipulations and exhibits in lieu of live witness testimony. The court found the evidence sufficient and entered a guilty finding. The court advised Wanless on the consequences, his limited right to appeal under the plea waiver and post-release medical and community support referrals.

Ending

The court entered the judgment, ordered 199 days in county jail with credit for any time served and directed counsel and staff to assist the defendant with post-release health-care planning.

","Charles Loring Wanless pleaded guilty to criminal mischief (lesser included offense) and the court accepted a plea, sentenced him to 199 days in the Bexar County Jail and dismissed higher felony enhancement.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6357450,"Court revokes supervision for Christopher Salinas, imposes five-year prison term",1457,7599000,9056000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2215069-a51f8167fe3346c45529d40a9ad618ab&start=7599&end=9056","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2215069-a51f8167fe3346c45529d40a9ad618ab/thumbnail_7599000.jpg","/articles/6357450/Texas/Court-revokes-supervision-for-Christopher-Salinas-imposes-five-year-prison-term","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6357450-10887190365656148395404e2e99981c/orig.mp4?Expires=1770961609&Signature=TKlG9P1DGFaYIP9pQ8pg-PWjyBHr-~prnn3XDuRSgIj9gcelaFhJDeplTXyRP6Kna~l3bWg~Xsh7cZjFhzuiEFTnZWs3YruBRS12R2G8Asi3Ecdls70nSNwKKECCmFbHSrd9-4Q57cmwpGLiN9Vz3faaHHAGvfEG5zODflKfJDkVWiO6NtFRv9fua8DPze7PuKZnLY8zZBXY0ufqHHIfzqNz-TE9yseSEOWwmpWYSTmvFjBK9YW-68cl4ci2hzzGS941Tom~AWLSt7nRyU4ndSeeiNU9QDqZ0gZkNLkMHJbA6nj0aVziIPDxjVZdJXL1P8Jha2xHScvzp796qyvF7A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The court adjudicated Christopher Salinas guilty after he pleaded true to allegations he failed to report to his supervision officer in 2024. The judge revoked his deferred adjudication and sentenced him to five years in prison, with credit for time served. Probation urged placement in a substance-abuse treatment program; defense counsel asked the court to consider the defendant's chronic medical issues and recommended an inpatient treatment placement if appropriate.

Why it matters: The court moved from supervision to a custodial sentence after finding repeated noncompliance; the judge said she would consider therapeutic options if applicable but imposed the statutory minimum requested by the state.

Court exchange and rationale

Defense counsel described Salinas's significant medical history, including an April 2023 hospital stay and subsequent chronic pain that counsel said had led to drug use and noncompliance. Counsel asked the court to allow inpatient substance-abuse treatment and to extend supervision instead of imprisonment. Probation recommended substance-abuse treatment and an 18-month extension.

Judge Boyd noted the violations listed in the motion (failure to report in specified months of 2024), and after considering counsel's explanation and probation's recommendation, found the violation true. The court adjudicated guilt and sentenced Salinas to five years in prison, giving credit for time served; the judge said she would recommend therapeutic custody placement where available but would not impose alternatives such as house arrest.

Ending

The court advised Salinas on appellate limits and on post-release health and medication planning and reiterated that defendants must notify probation and the court if they need assistance rather than stopping contact.

","Following a plea that he failed to report to his supervision officer, the court adjudicated Christopher Salinas guilty and sentenced him to five years in prison; probation recommended substance-abuse treatment but the court imposed incarceration with a therapeutic-community recommendation to the department where applicable.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6357455,"Court revokes supervision for Nicholas M. Henderson, sentences him to one year in state jail",141,5069000,5210000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2215069-a51f8167fe3346c45529d40a9ad618ab&start=5069&end=5210","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2215069-a51f8167fe3346c45529d40a9ad618ab/thumbnail_5069000.jpg","/articles/6357455/Texas/Court-revokes-supervision-for-Nicholas-M-Henderson-sentences-him-to-one-year-in-state-jail","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6357455-760ec319a14fc5eee9542901e00b34c4/orig.mp4?Expires=1770961609&Signature=kc3pgfGwKR5X7EJu7JDQaoLm1Xb2J-RvSOFepcwmnAck0AP-pm92OHIMlhjD3V~7CB2FH7BeR0mQDdSLyzI2-wc6VXKFluff0bkG9~afrqvfc5ziWAtgoAMKOoXeEZjHdGfao4M3YSWaRQ1x1fUS-SNofEsG5OoSEV0KzS6nzq5D6iSWx1CW3c7vuQ1hL9moytHmfK6IjoKwU9WrbEtffIocWt0QHIRmosa7MPuVi34nSksybCIOa32I2z9-OfVeMgfoFBt9gyvvBV9fYy6EtrBROEli85KEbJu2DGHdGdm-ZmeIOOLlJxiUKTrtBxEfCAMMGr7J-eknQC6CBbrdZQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Nicholas Michael Henderson told the court he failed to report to his supervision officer for several months in 2024 and pleaded true to the alleged violation; the judge adjudicated the violation and sentenced Henderson to one year in a state jail facility.

Why it matters: The court found repeated failures to report constituted a violation of Henderson's community-supervision terms; sentencing ended community supervision and imposed incarceration in the state jail range.

What happened in court

Prosecutors said Henderson failed to report as directed for July through November 2024. Henderson acknowledged the violations during a plea colloquy and told the judge he had \"hit a bad spot\" and had struggled to keep in contact while trying to work and pay fines. The state proposed adjudication and a sentence of one year in state jail. The defense had no objection to the state's recommendation.

The court adjudicated Henderson guilty, revoked his community supervision, and imposed a one-year state-jail sentence, giving credit for time served. The judge admonished Henderson about the limited right to appeal the motion-based adjudication and warned that, as a felony conviction, he would be restricted from possessing weapons or ammunition.

","A defendant placed on community supervision in 2022 pleaded true to alleged reporting violations for multiple months in 2024; the court adjudicated guilt and sentenced him to one year in a state jail facility.",{"_33":112,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":113,"_41":114,"_43":115,"_45":116,"_47":117,"_49":118,"_51":119,"_53":120,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":121,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":122,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6357460,"Judge Boyd grants continuance in McIntyre murder case, orders 30-day expert deadline and transcript search",3506,1183000,4689000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2215069-a51f8167fe3346c45529d40a9ad618ab&start=1183&end=4689","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2215069-a51f8167fe3346c45529d40a9ad618ab/thumbnail_1183000.jpg","/articles/6357460/Texas/Judge-Boyd-grants-continuance-in-McIntyre-murder-case-orders-30-day-expert-deadline-and-transcript-search","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6357460-7e2de5643528496f4215c3f0a09cc81b/orig.mp4?Expires=1770961609&Signature=EIA2uIShYPKBhMEP6b7lBgzeBospFgk-LmfBgDt1XFjwSfyxnguGB8CX7cs9dh1TYVNHAZBUgLYGo3eY59OMz~sFW8ZdXiI7FTEil-CEufubqmyVFS6EDWAiLY7jG6NRQ8ARlzPUhnUKvm9frMHTSI~dRgLp507sBKhxCqF8r8ea2K-2k5t1p0rrJMkpd3A2JjIg6kysYnu6GpKvP02jor4ZyIGHr5r-7i3WgQn4LtDi-IESZbUbcInmknjPUeixBn-Hrs0N~Yf6Z8ic1VwVEaj5nvNq18UXKMyaeNFOgflGF~xF50q0PmTJopYwvQOCqLRXPlwpeIwIN4yY8~ZYgg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Judge Stephanie Boyd of the 187th District Court on Monday granted the defense's motion for a continuance in the 2019 murder case against Tamar McIntyre, citing newly disclosed discovery, an outstanding firearms expert report and an unproduced transcript of prior sworn testimony from a state's key witness.

The defense asked for more time after finding a single-line reference in voluminous discovery that suggested a firearm recovered from an indicted codefendant, Jalen Bell, had not been fully tested. Defense counsel said the identity or exclusion of that firearm could be \"material\" to McIntyre's defense that he was not the shooter. Jay Goldstein and John Hunter, defense lawyers in the case, told the court they had retained a firearms expert, referred to in court as Mr. Husky, who told them he could produce a report but had not yet completed his analysis.

Why it matters: The court record shows the case has been reset multiple times since 2019. The defense said the newly accessible portions of a prior phone extraction and additional statements from codefendants were recently delivered in a form they could use; the defense said it has not had adequate time to process those materials or to receive a final expert opinion on the firearm comparisons.

Details of the hearing

Prosecutor Jason Gerahan told the court he and law enforcement located a firearm and had submitted it for ballistics testing; the state provided a lab report that the defense asked to vet independently. Goldstein said his expert initially believed he could evaluate bench notes and other work product without laboratory access but later told the defense he still required additional time to complete a final report.

Goldstein also told the court late last week he learned the state's chief witness had given sworn testimony before another judge as part of a plea or sentencing proceeding; that transcript has not been produced to the defense. Defense counsel cited a recent Court of Criminal Appeals decision saying such prior sworn testimony must be disclosed \"as soon as is practicable.\" The defense asked the court to obtain or order production of any transcript of that testimony.

Judge Boyd's orders and timeline

- She told the defense to call and confirm with the firearms expert, and the expert said he would have an opinion within 30 days.
- She granted the motion for continuance and set jury selection for March 31 (a Monday). The judge limited jury selection to the courtroom (approximately 75 jurors) and refused further requests for special central-jury-room settings that would call 200 jurors and require extra taxpayer-paid juror payments.
- She directed the parties to locate the court reporter who handled the earlier proceeding in which the codefendant testified and to produce any transcript of that testimony within the 30-day period.
- The judge gave the parties 30 days to process the newly producible phone extraction and related discovery and warned there would be no further continuances without good cause.

What the parties said

Goldstein (defense) said the defense discovered an isolated reference in July 2024 to possible ballistics testing for a firearm linked to codefendant Jalen Bell, and the defense subsequently worked with the prosecutor to locate the evidence. He said the defense engaged Mr. Husky formally around Oct. 10, 2024, but the expert's final report was still pending.

Gerahan (state) confirmed the prosecution had located the firearm, submitted it for testing and provided a ballistics report; he said the state was not intentionally withholding discovery.

Court context and history

Judge Boyd read the case docket into the record, noting the file dates back to 2019 and has been repeatedly continued and set for discovery and trial dates since May 2023. The judge emphasized the court's expectation that parties prepare for trial promptly and be ready when special jury settings are scheduled.

Ending

Judge Boyd said she would grant the continuance but insisted on firm timelines: 30 days for the expert report and transcript production and a March 31 jury-selection setting. She warned parties to avoid future requests for central-jury-room settings that call large numbers of jurors and instructed them to document due diligence on the newly produced phone and evidence material.

","The 2019 murder prosecution of Tamar McIntyre was continued after defense counsel said newly discovered ballistics material, a pending expert analysis and an unproduced transcript from a codefendant's plea required more time; Judge Stephanie Boyd gave parties 30 days to complete work and set jury selection for March 31.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Judge Boyd orders bond forfeitures and remands in multiple no-shows; court gives chance to reinstate if defendants appear

Man pleads guilty to criminal mischief; court orders 199 days in county jail

Court revokes supervision for Christopher Salinas, imposes five-year prison term

Court revokes supervision for Nicholas M. Henderson, sentences him to one year in state jail

Judge Boyd grants continuance in McIntyre murder case, orders 30-day expert deadline and transcript search