[{"_1":2,"_100":-5,"_101":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6357421,"mediaKeyId","2215088-93c47a2c5026b97d8809c06a9ae43433","parentId",2215088,"title","Commission votes to recommend moving campgrounds from A‑1 to C‑2 zoning; public commenters urge enforcement and transparency","audioSeconds",1358,"startMs",4082000,"endMs",5440000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2215088-93c47a2c5026b97d8809c06a9ae43433&start=4082&end=5440","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2215088-93c47a2c5026b97d8809c06a9ae43433/thumbnail_4082000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6357421/Tennessee/Commission-votes-to-recommend-moving-campgrounds-from-A1-to-C2-zoning-public-commenters-urge-enforcement-and-transparency","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6357421-532b98f6b6cea2be2100c0a196562545/orig.mp4?Expires=1775612865&Signature=GVxGvZHI1fSlm0HD6l33lI0nvP27f7aHXz28fUmgsY~t2NYLthPP1hwLqt-wNCeBOJQQoyPrH2CoEbhnpyBMfA7grtfAf19CZ~LpBw4kbCDIv4BL9q-DPgNikH~MzKErjiln30Kx5dAFnjJojshlxgdQOJoDDYxzX9FcDBxeWw0zKPkyO9SkShJRv6B7pEelkji7AjAl2YSjDbe40ReuE0FDctLwytpo8pJka3n26U22Kxn3fKdFAmiWWQQgo8jBaSub4QkxGCHwXkxwEXs1bIFfjppAQWpPca8bIyyF2Zgwo3vfB-BvU0qVWpLXJOS-wYKmotoyLRPbNxpQsv446w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Jefferson County, TN","date","2025-01-30T04:07:03Z","article","The regional planning commission on Jan. 28 voted to recommend to the county commission an amendment that would remove campgrounds and similar recreational‑vehicle uses from the county’s A‑1 agricultural zoning district and place those uses in the C‑2 general commercial district.

Commissioners and staff said the proposed change would not ban campgrounds but would require rezonings (or special approvals in C‑2) that go before the county commission, giving elected officials greater oversight. Proponents argued the change would limit the practice of establishing campgrounds across large rural agricultural parcels and provide more local review of potentially intensive uses.

During public comment, multiple residents raised a separate, ongoing dispute about a local site (referred to repeatedly as Grace Construction / the Jim Henry property) where sheds, bunkhouses and related building permits were issued; residents alleged the approvals were handled in‑house rather than being brought before the planning commission. Commenters asked the commission to pull the recorded plats and to provide written documentation of any delegation of authority that allows staff to approve two‑lot plats without commission action. Citizens asked for a written review of whether the recorded plat had the regional planning commission secretary’s signature as required by the county’s subdivision regulations.

Planning staff said the authority to approve certain two‑lot plats is rooted in state statute and longstanding county practice but agreed to locate and present the written resolution or policy that documents the delegation and to bring it back to the commission. Several residents said they believe the county’s subdivision regulations were not followed in the Grace matter and requested a review; a resident urged that any improperly issued permits be invalidated and that disciplinary action be considered if staff exceeded their authority.

After discussion and with no recorded objection, the commission approved a motion to recommend the proposed zoning change (moving campgrounds from A‑1 into C‑2) to the Jefferson County Commission for action. The commission also agreed to follow up on the public records request regarding delegation of two‑lot approvals and to supply the relevant documentation in a future meeting.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","January 28, 2025 - Jefferson County, TN - Board of Zoning Appeal & Regional Planning Commission","oneSentenceSummary","The planning commission recommended a resolution to move campgrounds out of the county’s A‑1 agricultural district and into the C‑2 commercial district so that rezonings would require county commission review. Public commenters raised concerns about a specific camp/subdivision approval and about in‑house approvals for two‑lot plats.","taxTitle","Board of Zoning Appeals and Regional Planning Commission Meetings, Jefferson County, Tennessee","taxId",73403,"location","Tennessee","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6357426,"Commission discusses two‑phase RV resort site plan; staff outlines subdivision and bond requirements",1902,2608000,4510000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2215088-93c47a2c5026b97d8809c06a9ae43433&start=2608&end=4510","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2215088-93c47a2c5026b97d8809c06a9ae43433/thumbnail_2608000.jpg","/articles/6357426/Tennessee/Commission-discusses-twophase-RV-resort-site-plan-staff-outlines-subdivision-and-bond-requirements","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6357426-647a156ab9c1b784413f810c4042a605/orig.mp4?Expires=1775612865&Signature=BuRmvjjOJ9eXqpWcjMYEUUTRh1GRE-4tEWpT17T2nNBS5uE~jScXNmIXwpynVE9bQsP9nF5njFSZ0EjlN5ngNVD9~KeA8moM0XxwxQP-NZ4LFSs5gvwcooiDIux1Cu~ucAq5q0qGlBqYoSbysxqwBZ99ghz85kifqnLEHXUzeSJQ-F~E62s4XHLOccnIVgsyEqGtrN20BwuuK-pU-AsPQr5CAfpvXDK3ZywfdVBrUYSRjQDFyvFlADSUGUCCfOgcEDCgJah7M1F8ArwUkYPp8-tZmjoH8k611jxJ8i5WHJtkTbmtM8OYAuH3rR95~vQQ3DXuBIIAMd17-quTFvvQ4w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Planning staff and the applicant presented a two‑phase site plan for an RV resort comprised of multiple legal parcels. The commission’s discussion centered on whether the two parcels could be considered together for site plan review, how performance criteria must be satisfied on each lot, and what subdivision/platting steps are required before infrastructure work begins.

Staff explained that state law typically exempts lots over five acres from subdivision regulations unless the developer proposes to dedicate roadways or utilities; nevertheless, a final plat must meet county subdivision regulations and be recorded. Commissioners asked whether phase 1 and phase 2 should be considered as separate agenda items because the parcels are not adjoining; staff replied that while it is not typical, the commission’s regulations are silent on prohibiting non‑adjoining parcels to be reviewed together and that both parcels must independently meet performance criteria.

The applicant’s engineer had submitted revised sheets responding to prior staff comments; staff recommended that a subdivision plat be filed and reviewed for compliance with the Jefferson County Subdivision Regulations prior to recording. Commissioners discussed vesting/vested rights: staff noted that once construction is initiated and vesting rights are established, later amendments to regulations typically do not apply to initiated phases, but cautioned the commission staff to confirm how long vested rights should be recognized.

A substantial portion of the discussion addressed bonding/surety for public improvements. Staff proposed (and later clarified) language for the subdivision regulations updates requiring a letter of credit or other acceptable surety that is payable locally and can be collected by the county. The draft changes also proposed an itemized opinion of probable cost, an annual review of surety values, and a maintenance bond equal to a percentage (suggested 20%) of the original surety to ensure repair of any post‑construction failures.

Commissioners and staff also discussed timetable and expiration for final plats and site plan approvals; staff indicated a preference for a defined recording window (45 days for a final plat was discussed) and for an administrative report to the commission listing outstanding sureties. The commission agreed the draft changes required further editing and that a public hearing should be scheduled after a redline version was circulated to commissioners and county attorneys.

Staff said it would circulate a marked‑up (strike/strike‑redline) version of the proposed subdivision regulation changes and would advertise a public hearing; the commission set a target of scheduling the hearing in late March to allow the 30‑day notice period required for a public hearing on regulatory changes.","The commission reviewed a two‑phase site plan for an RV resort on multiple parcels. Staff and commissioners discussed phasing, platting, subdivision exemptions for lots over 5 acres, bonding/surety amounts and the process for accepting roads and utilities before recommending changes to subdivision regulations and scheduling a public hearing.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6357430,"Applicant seeks semi-truck parking on Phillips Road; staff and commissioners ask for road, air-quality and operations details",302,188000,490000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2215088-93c47a2c5026b97d8809c06a9ae43433&start=188&end=490","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2215088-93c47a2c5026b97d8809c06a9ae43433/thumbnail_188000.jpg","/articles/6357430/Tennessee/Applicant-seeks-semi-truck-parking-on-Phillips-Road-staff-and-commissioners-ask-for-road-air-quality-and-operations-details","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6357430-8452d87fac5a4f8f4ea40ff2d6451700/orig.mp4?Expires=1775612865&Signature=DZ3gfdK6IlbdcIyvg-xDVUv~yZmMO1~DrIlmfJ-v03mlmRpxEt0PrtJTMBJ7ZzUUYIGWagDJE~dvEMS8~gIzRumUpdy9BXsyY1BJYLb7WQ56kmbyR9ROb~9ylcIXtY3wiW4kmjOMrOPld5VCfJZVrZDVJIhvZKhy~Ercd3tkIvJ32fzrUDxLA0lUHuk4NYw1RFsBglH4Z6sq3b1hcAWdY1SqYW62DvBvfofO7MkMiABLxQ7SsuRWEfWqY9SHkWYq68~mNKc5u676sR39bgvtXrCWJ5TjOqexkweXj0euK9ZdfCxooZBeuCIRNVC5otYb6QTJ1bG8uuQJHzSvQZWsFA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","An applicant proposing a semi‑truck parking and storage facility on Phillips Road asked the Board of Zoning Appeals and Regional Planning Commission on Jan. 28 to determine whether the use is allowable in the county’s C-2 general commercial district.

Planning staff told the commission the proposal as shown in the applicant’s package would include roughly 260 semi‑trailer parking spaces and a single shower/bathhouse; the site plan provided was preliminary and based on a map overlay rather than a certified survey. Planning staff said the proposed use is not explicitly permitted in C-2 and that the commission should interpret whether the operation is similar to allowed uses in the district.

Staff and several commissioners flagged multiple technical and neighborhood‑impact questions. A county staff speaker said the applicant must clarify likely length of stay, whether drivers will occupy truck cabs overnight, whether diesel engines would run continuously, and what check‑in or security will be provided. The staff speaker also warned that the county is in an air‑quality maintenance area and that overnight diesel engine operation could create a significant off‑site air‑quality impact.

Commissioners and staff raised concerns about Phillips Road itself: members said the road is a narrow 17‑foot county road, likely not built to heavy industrial standards, and could be damaged by frequent heavy truck traffic. Members asked that the county road superintendent document the roadway condition and estimate the construction standard and likely cost of repair if the use goes forward. Staff also asked for analysis of turn movements, off‑site truck queuing, and the adequacy of existing nearby truck services.

The applicant, who identified himself as RJ Graham, described the concept as a secure, fenced parking lot with app‑based access control, primarily targeted at locally owned owner‑operators who lack private parking. Graham said the preliminary layout would be revised to provide pull‑through stalls and that the number of long‑term truck parking spaces was likely to be reduced from the initial 260 to about 130. He said the surface would start as compacted gravel with an asphalt top coat in a later phase and that stormwater controls would be addressed during site plan review.

Commissioners and staff questioned permeable paving, with staff noting permeable surfaces are generally not appropriate for semi‑truck loadings because such surfaces can be compacted and lose permeability. Staff asked the applicant to provide engineered pavement sections, a stormwater plan, a certified survey, a revised parking count, and a description of security and management operations. Several commissioners recommended getting input from the county road superintendent and the county health/environmental authority regarding the proposed bathhouse and any sanitary impacts.

No final approval was recorded in the meeting transcript. Commissioners moved to request additional information and to refer technical questions to the county road superintendent and relevant county departments for a written response before the commission makes a use determination.

The commission’s action at the meeting therefore was procedural: staff was directed to obtain further technical details and to return the item for a future decision when those materials are available.","An applicant asked the regional planning commission to allow a semi‑truck parking/storage facility in a C-2 area. Planning staff and commission members said they cannot recommend approval without more data about road construction, traffic and air emissions; commissioners asked staff to get engineering and county-road input.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Commission votes to recommend moving campgrounds from A‑1 to C‑2 zoning; public commenters urge enforcement and transparency

Commission discusses two‑phase RV resort site plan; staff outlines subdivision and bond requirements

Applicant seeks semi-truck parking on Phillips Road; staff and commissioners ask for road, air-quality and operations details