[{"_1":2,"_123":-5,"_124":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99,111],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6354389,"mediaKeyId","2220070-f6a9708e9a6578449eccab2a311888e2","parentId",2220070,"title","Commissioners agree to send mill renovation questions to budget committee after community raised $10,600","audioSeconds",94,"startMs",7593000,"endMs",7687000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2220070-f6a9708e9a6578449eccab2a311888e2&start=7593&end=7687","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2220070-f6a9708e9a6578449eccab2a311888e2/thumbnail_7593000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6354389/White-County/Tennessee/Commissioners-agree-to-send-mill-renovation-questions-to-budget-committee-after-community-raised-10600","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6354389-06cee7532e4813c9dfb8c5951e8a8084/orig.mp4?Expires=1775764486&Signature=cPlWEC5b77yfx4mduS9B9LY1hs8~tbl5Rbg3Ewt4UuneO25uuEAyvQrChWQjFxXdkb194KJWnZPaYiE2gXPHLfECu~Jfn8v5NctbA13jb~1zMvNK6JK9nftGf-lEQvYGXviB03nV2u5pEfmAJIVPZzg8EJgQoWc6obKvmHtWO5iLGrDaMED~XJA2u~ul19ejqrNWMUB9EAlK20TV6bVogwRnaUIBHK1O0H4x9jCiqY~5~-FsERGRg~7ju4q3uyrlOMRPQ4YXk2Q4RmvAz1mr~65oXm~-N5xVlu1j3wo03u5EXodOsZr8IuFkPF5smLH4xHMuWkPTW4VgNGCsgVmSQQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","White County, TN","date","2025-02-03T00:00:00Z","article","County committees discussed renovation of a historic rolling sawmill on county-owned property that had been donated for preservation. A local community group (the Quebec Walling Community Center or similar community group) raised $10,600 for the project and spent $3,500 on initial cleanup; organizers asked the county to consider contributing the balance needed to construct a protective shelter around a stationary steam engine and mill artifact.

Staff presented three bids to erect the shelter: a low bid around $17,688 (which the community would partially fund with its remaining $7,100), other bids roughly $24,064 and $25,018, and various cost details (one quote included labor and crane rental). Committee members discussed whether the quoted structures were metal carport-style shelters or more elaborate enclosures and whether volunteer labor could reduce cost. Some members suggested the community could help remove unstable materials first, which might reduce the county’s labor and crane expenses.

Committee members voted to refer the item to the budget committee so staff and budget members can examine funding options and project scope further; staff said the community’s donation has already been accepted by the county and appropriated into restricted funds.

Ending: The project will be examined by the budget committee, which will consider whether the county should contribute roughly the county-funded remainder (approximately $10,000 if the low bid and community donation figures are used) or recommend alternate approaches such as volunteer-led demolition and a simpler shelter.

","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Committee Meetings 2025-02-03","oneSentenceSummary","A community group raised $10,600 toward a protective shelter around a historic rolling sawmill; the county received three quotes (roughly $17,688 to $25,018) and the committee voted to send the project to the budget committee for further review.","taxTitle","White County, Tennessee","taxId",73494,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6354394,"County awards ARP-era waterline contract after vetting low bidder; contractor selected is Mead's Construction",119,7238000,7357000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2220070-f6a9708e9a6578449eccab2a311888e2&start=7238&end=7357","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2220070-f6a9708e9a6578449eccab2a311888e2/thumbnail_7238000.jpg","/articles/6354394/White-County/Tennessee/County-awards-ARP-era-waterline-contract-after-vetting-low-bidder-contractor-selected-is-Meads-Construction","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6354394-df6ea29bcfdb178c3558de7138666e0f/orig.mp4?Expires=1775764486&Signature=NizwbISjT9MMSrDimHHOdnQJ72iJYMgmypu9yquTDyeIY2SzaOpi0BCFRrTaP2TqnXIYXLh1djeJ9ms7H6WZTt0lh1qGlIgyYdq8B8Wy-fO19l8M2bN8SiJMj4mw3acA0VitEUV3wsg2UdD0hkULMF1Y1BIXmi6wdQZRGRCMffob81Yzpu1A4kvQacg0T5K3BrQ30NPEwTd3VTv0aObFJULNnlWfY0B2v5l1282T7J6gk4OgYxRR6vj6Fvo0zjuOaKQmt2ow~KFumXVkcctXtEaKPUhYvmydbFeou-vQcPs4b-qXdKssuZ75XTa-I35zTcaScBqFCGNbiXSdRpPrUQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","County staff presented procurement results for the Bonnycroft (Bonnie Croft) Utility District ARP waterline project, which is funded in part through American Rescue Plan (ARP) allocations and requires a local match. The project drew four bids: a low bidder at $442,883.75, two mid-range bidders clustered around $615,000, and a high bid near $921,000.

Because the county’s procurement team and the utility district raised concerns after vetting the apparent low bidder’s prior performance and qualifications, staff recommended awarding the contract to the second-lowest bidder. The Bonnycroft Utility District board concurred and submitted a supporting memorandum. Committee members reviewed that recommendation and the supplementary memorandum staff received from the second-low bidder’s representative.

A motion to award the contract to Mead’s Construction (the recommended second-low bidder) passed by voice vote. Staff recorded that documentation of the vetting process and the utility district’s recommendation will be included in the procurement file.

Ending: Procurement was approved in committee; staff will finalize contract documents and retain the vetting memorandum in the procurement file.","After vetting bidders for the Bonnycroft utility district ARP waterline project, staff recommended and the committee approved awarding the contract to the second-low bidder, Mead's Construction; the low bid raised concerns during the review.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6354399,"Commission committee sends resolution to state asking half of real-estate transfer tax revenue be returned to county",111,4401000,4512000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2220070-f6a9708e9a6578449eccab2a311888e2&start=4401&end=4512","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2220070-f6a9708e9a6578449eccab2a311888e2/thumbnail_4401000.jpg","/articles/6354399/White-County/Tennessee/Commission-committee-sends-resolution-to-state-asking-half-of-real-estate-transfer-tax-revenue-be-returned-to-county","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6354399-f70c0cdc7baed9f0c6f87a55213062bf/orig.mp4?Expires=1775764486&Signature=AQcTZLP6xhJJB4frBCpJ~Yb3By7Os6Hyfxrz4ODEACL7jScyL~xwCeliA29MIo3FvmuJdy1VouGB0e85tvZHM2NQzwBY~AJX-quG9k3CUC8L4JgQo8sDdZVP0RlSXJdOTuFYosVWiXQD58MLR6Z6gjfLtOl9qrL7IfHkE6gR1ZS2BXlr2Y-HeoKdGjr~oq1fdzD1CT2no2XoOIJB6GZhe0bVb07WgsIQcyGeW8wvWLp0kHGmMlki5aIwdFruTN0hSaAuHqo5LJox~IAoj3zcAA5pld58XlOiTChpda1ciNDvTlWiOQwT1LVN9-SXqoX0NuMOhcEHOBuSmTpxugey5Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Committee members reviewed and approved a resolution requesting the state consider allocating half of the real-estate transfer tax revenue back to the counties where it is collected. Under current state practice, Tennessee collects a $0.37 per $100 real-estate transfer tax when deeds are recorded and remits that revenue to the state treasury. The resolution asks the state to allocate 50% of the revenue to the county of origin on an ongoing basis.

During discussion commissioners asked about the amount White County generates; staff and commissioners referenced an illustrative figure of roughly $850,000 as the county’s historical amount that could be affected if half were returned. The committee voted to forward the resolution to full court for consideration.

Ending: The resolution will be sent to full court for formal action; staff noted the state process would be required for any change in revenue sharing.","Committee approved a resolution asking the state to share half of the 37¢ per $100 real-estate transfer tax back to the counties where it was collected; White County estimates its half could be roughly $850,000 based on recent years.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6354403,"Commission committee adopts updated residential permit fee schedule, sends valuation table to full court",534,3794000,4328000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2220070-f6a9708e9a6578449eccab2a311888e2&start=3794&end=4328","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2220070-f6a9708e9a6578449eccab2a311888e2/thumbnail_3794000.jpg","/articles/6354403/White-County/Tennessee/Commission-committee-adopts-updated-residential-permit-fee-schedule-sends-valuation-table-to-full-court","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6354403-4758672ec258defb062eaf27bfe85a79/orig.mp4?Expires=1775764486&Signature=RBVXT4dfoGcyL9EJJ7TTGJA9gMPQQ2~9ZB9PZS2ow7yzx-Dq744mMOkmbZxWX6fryoVbI2TIq7~INhlsbhcDhYvmyMGrHNyhpWvQZkARHw419xG4W1aZV2R6wyBzl431b0bSOdsbNiHWweFXMmtuPuR7x05sVKym-cfGGkXTPU~tDPWemMv9Sd8HoBtdDZa-SrtwtohA~Rnk4pjAjNvGk4MeKK~7wxWXM74udhppYuuTP18-jmN~3V2KNRBK2iFaAZyblLX961LVDwlkxaqp15c7O2~hrnPShUl0tSg3rg1lhxocbrvHzDFqvhdqJcSJSJzqGueLeme-uW6t0g4uTA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","County staff presented a proposed update to the residential building permit fee schedule and the valuation table used to calculate permit fees, recommending the county adopt the 2018/2012 valuation methodology (a square-foot / cost-based schedule) for residential permits.

Staff explained the two-part approach: (1) a per-square-foot construction cost basis (example cited: $130 per square foot for R‑3 residential new construction under the referenced table) and (2) a secondary valuation table for utility and miscellaneous structures (garages, decks, barns and additions). The presentation noted the proposal is similar to nearby Sparta and that adoption would standardize how the county estimates construction value for permits.

A motion to adopt the fee schedule and the valuation table as presented passed in committee and will be sent to full court for consideration. Committee members noted the proposed change would affect how permit revenue is estimated; an informal projection mentioned a possible revenue change on the order of a few thousand dollars annually based on the county’s recent permit activity, but staff will provide detailed estimates at full court.

Ending: The committee approved forwarding the fee schedule and valuation table to the full county court for final adoption.

","Committee voted to adopt a residential permit fee schedule and valuation table based on the 2018/2012 valuation methodology and to forward the adoption to full court for final approval.",{"_33":112,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":113,"_41":114,"_43":115,"_45":116,"_47":117,"_49":118,"_51":119,"_53":120,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":121,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":122,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6354408,"White County commissioners debate future of animal shelter, consider switching to animal-control model",1447,2253000,3700000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2220070-f6a9708e9a6578449eccab2a311888e2&start=2253&end=3700","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2220070-f6a9708e9a6578449eccab2a311888e2/thumbnail_2253000.jpg","/articles/6354408/White-County/Tennessee/White-County-commissioners-debate-future-of-animal-shelter-consider-switching-to-animal-control-model","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6354408-691fd4b32e51b64c169543df75a639dd/orig.mp4?Expires=1775764486&Signature=OAa2O1i9lAZNlrhGyYb6Mv4zWRkVMgCKLROefZfYuU0D0xCtFmk5EYl57AT5djzxMgrxfSMQ8BbYsf~~RiAgrt9DMPqBKCxpJKTpn9IXy2C6WpFuwLUiOeRRUKltdZ8xWPzTbXG1muVeWQ-HlZDlq85A8r2KIJ8hH2mrFkQtZDXJCCGBCNbQA8W62yBYJ-2lXSMEsYKUG-gkL2snhVtLmH846RNA51t3~-SHkAbPbXiZxsEZVKoTQWfADnDUXnwBKZyonzWM-wmfWdP3oFdveKrcNjqDQ-~pvgYk9m7Xgt446rD60Ot2fE0ClZ~4sT3sgfArCLUzW4neWCGIskhWWA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","White County commissioners and staff reviewed a draft policy for the county animal shelter and discussed whether the county should maintain a taxpayer-funded shelter or convert to an animal-control model that relies on nonprofits for long-term care.

The conversation began when Executive Robinson distributed proposed policy and procedures for the shelter and asked the committees to review them and return comments. Commissioners and speakers raised several operational questions, including the appropriate minimum hold time for stray animals (options discussed ranged from 14 to 28 days), the shelter’s designed capacity (previously 16 but currently holding about 30), and whether animal-control duties should be performed by a Tennessee Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST)-certified officer under the sheriff’s office.

Volunteers and longtime shelter workers, including Monica Jacob and former staffers Sarah Lawson and Stephanie Smith, described the range of day-to-day responsibilities historically handled by a higher-paid position listed in the county budget as “other salaries and wages” — hiring and supervising part-time staff, intake paperwork, vaccination and medical coordination, adoption and rescue coordination, web and social-media postings, and supply procurement. Those speakers urged the county to create written job descriptions so employees understand duties and expectations.

Several commissioners and staff said the county must decide whether its primary role should be animal control (enforcement, citations for nuisance animals, and handling bites/strays) or operating a full-service, taxpayer-funded shelter (intake, medical care, adoption and outreach). Executive Robinson and others described two likely outcomes: (1) county-run animal control with a POST-certified officer under Sheriff Page and annual county grants to local 501(c)(3) rescues to handle sheltering and adoption; or (2) county-run shelter operations with the county directly staffing and funding shelter management and veterinary care. Commissioners noted the choice affects budgeting, staffing, liability and whether the sheriff’s office will accept responsibility for enforcement.

Speakers also identified an existing restricted donation (about $65,000–$70,000) tied to the shelter and noted the county holds a five-year lease for the current facility beginning in mid‑2024. Committees agreed it would be premature to make a final switch immediately but directed staff to schedule a formal agenda item at next month’s meeting to discuss the county’s direction for animal control and to invite Sheriff Page to that meeting to discuss the sheriff’s willingness and capacity to accept a POST-certified animal-control assignment.

Other steps discussed included: clarifying job descriptions for current shelter staff, evaluating whether to fund a second full-time shelter position (the committees later agreed to resend that budget request to the budget committee for reconsideration), and deciding whether county funds should be provided annually to local nonprofits that would operate shelter services.

Committees did not adopt a final policy at this meeting; they asked staff to return a focused agenda item next month that would include Sheriff Page and more specific cost and staffing estimates so commissioners could make an informed decision.

Ending: The committees left the matter open for additional information and discussion next month, with a formal agenda item to include the sheriff and staff budget details.","County officials reviewed proposed shelter policies, disagreed over hold times and staffing, and directed staff to place a formal discussion with Sheriff Page on next month’s agenda as they weigh whether the county should operate an animal-control service and fund nonprofits rather than run an expanded shelter.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Commissioners agree to send mill renovation questions to budget committee after community raised $10,600

County awards ARP-era waterline contract after vetting low bidder; contractor selected is Mead's Construction

Commission committee sends resolution to state asking half of real-estate transfer tax revenue be returned to county

Commission committee adopts updated residential permit fee schedule, sends valuation table to full court

White County commissioners debate future of animal shelter, consider switching to animal-control model