Utah lawmakers propose bill to secure $21 million for foster children in custody

In a poignant moment during the recent Social Services Appropriations Subcommittee meeting, a passionate plea was made for the welfare of children in state custody who have lost their parents. The speaker highlighted the dire circumstances faced by these vulnerable youths, emphasizing that they are not only victims of abuse or neglect but also bear the heavy burden of losing their primary advocates and support systems.

The discussion centered around a troubling aspect of federal law that allows states to redirect social security and survivor benefits meant for these children to offset the costs of their care. This practice, described as akin to "stealing candy from a baby," has resulted in Utah taking over $21 million from these children since 2015. Last year alone, 464 kids lost an average of $5,000 each, funds that could have significantly impacted their futures.

Statistics shared during the meeting painted a grim picture of the outcomes for foster children. One in four will face homelessness upon turning 18, while half will not graduate high school. The speaker urged the committee to consider the long-term implications of these financial decisions, noting that many of these children will struggle with incarceration and early pregnancies.

To address this issue, the proposed bill, HB 302, seeks to change the current practice by allowing the state to retain only 50% of these benefits, setting the remainder aside in an account for the children. This initiative aims to provide them with a financial foundation as they transition into adulthood, enabling them to pursue education, secure transportation, and even save for housing.

The speaker concluded with a heartfelt call to action, urging committee members to support the bill and advocate for the rights of these children who lack a voice in the system. "We are their parents," they stated, emphasizing the responsibility of the state to nurture and uplift these young individuals rather than perpetuate a cycle of disadvantage.

As the meeting progressed, attention shifted to other pressing issues, including a discussion on infant cremation fee waivers, but the echoes of the earlier discussion lingered, reminding all present of the critical need for compassion and reform in the state's approach to child welfare.