[{"_1":2,"_111":-5,"_112":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},"mediaId",6349439,"mediaKeyId","2238601-d1b274d310501278370c9b0176384102","parentId",2238601,"title","Votes at a glance: Washington County Commission approves consent agenda, purchase requests and a suite of appointments and resolutions","audioSeconds",2745,"startMs",185000,"endMs",2930000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2238601-d1b274d310501278370c9b0176384102&start=185&end=2930","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2238601-d1b274d310501278370c9b0176384102/thumbnail_185000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6349439/Utah/Votes-at-a-glance-Washington-County-Commission-approves-consent-agenda-purchase-requests-and-a-suite-of-appointments-and-resolutions","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6349439-a4a71694b770576f7159679fa8fd0533/orig.mp4?Expires=1773573897&Signature=KgilNN878mn8IH7qMs1aFpZi6-1SLs4mVqlro-jTre~hllRxWDAAFG1JldNo3aGPZmqueMg1VWlWGqtY4fcOKB3SYg19w9QDzvp88pz8zP~Bo8072BY5erDg75qTtqqTZe8ciqigjOI9acWQAM-q4uKRsyIV5kKPp6fyj5POUjiOBh4jHAK3ZLrW0EF8JOGLg5rAPWOSc6LLsjM9-R~TGZmwTDY34enTXkSe~aNfyjw6ebElvtJjT9QRQ4i5AWtW6vuqvrguDOy7-0fzPwgJb1ZjzLg46pQT2A57FhWx6a9XlfW~vJz~L~yOo19EewG1TdQxUsbKsJrN4AgnjDQ50A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","","date","2025-02-05T12:05:06Z","article","Washington County commissioners approved a series of routine and substantive items in a single meeting, including the consent agenda, purchase requests, multiple board appointments, interlocal agreements, a service agreement, the RAP appropriation, and the Warner Valley MOA. All motions recorded in the meeting passed by unanimous voice vote unless otherwise noted.

The nut graf: the meeting combined routine housekeeping (consent agenda and multiple appointments) with specific policy actions — most notably approval of RAP fund allocations and conditional approval of the Warner Valley MOA — and a package of purchase requests for county departments.

Key votes and outcomes (motions as recorded in the meeting):

- Consent agenda: Motion to approve claims for payment for 01/22/2025 through 02/04/2025; minutes of 01/21/2025; administrative adjustments for real and personal property; ratification of the 2025 Legacy Park fee schedule; and proof of publication of ordinance no. 20251281‑O (published 01/26/2025). Outcome: approved by voice vote.

- Purchase requests (Item 2): Motion to approve multiple purchase requests for county departments. Items listed in the presentation included two Toyota RAV4 Hybrids at $33,437 each (total $66,874 reported as $66,062 in transcript), a Permazyme road‑treatment application for two miles of Metukla Road ($16,580), 7 HP ProBook laptops and 4 HP workstations for the attorney’s office (total $10,512.32), repair to a CAT track‑hoe ($19,554.66), entertainment contract for Fisher Family Farms for the fair ($10,000), SWAT gas‑delivery system and training ($26,250), AC units for the Search and Rescue barn ($36,197), firearms suppressors and attachments ($16,474), and four 2025 Ford F‑150 trucks with trade‑ins (per‑truck prices and trade values listed). Outcome: approved by voice vote.

- Resolution R2025‑3444 (Item 3): Appointments to the Council on Aging Advisory Board — appointments/reappointments for Susan Niedert, Tamara Atkinson (reappointment) and Susan Elmer (reappointment). Outcome: approved.

- Resolution R2025‑3445 (Item 4): Appointments to the Five‑County Aging and Nutrition Services Advisory Board — appointment for Susan Neider and reappointment for Dean (name as stated in transcript). Outcome: approved; terms noted to end in 2027.

- Resolution R2025‑3446 (Item 5): Adoption of the 2025 Master Priority Corridor Preservation Project List and approval of an $85,000 request to acquire right‑of‑way next to Diamond Valley Drive. Outcome: approved.

- Resolution R2025‑3447 (Item 6): Execution of an interlocal cooperation agreement for election services between Washington County and local governments. Outcome: approved.

- Resolution R2025‑3448 (Item 7): Service agreement for scheduled HVAC services at the Dixie Center. Outcome: approved.

- Resolution R2025‑3449 (Item 8): Appointment of Clark Fawcett to the Ash Creek Special Service District Administrative Control Board, term expiring 12/31/2025. Outcome: approved.

- Resolution R2025‑3450 (Item 9): Appointment of Wayne Olsen to Solid Waste Special Service District No. 1, term expiring 12/31/2025. Outcome: approved.

- Resolution R2025‑3451 (Item 10): Appointment(s) to the Southwest Regional Response and Coordination Team. Outcome: approved (names not specified in the transcript).

- Resolution R2025‑3452 (Item 11): Appointments to the Northwestern Special Service District: Slade Hughes and Scott Holt (terms to expire December 31; transcript lists appointment and second). Outcome: approved.

- Resolution R2025‑3453 (Item 12): Appropriation of expenditures from Washington County’s 15% share of the Recreation, Arts and Parks sales tax as recommended by the RAP advisory board. Outcome: approved (see separate article for discussion and public comment).

- Resolution R2025‑3454 (Item 13): Approval of a memorandum of agreement for treatment of historic properties tied to the Warner Valley Reservoir land transactions, subject to county legal review and with the chair authorized to accept minor edits requested by UDOT. Outcome: approved.

Ending: All motions on the printed agenda were approved. The meeting concluded with airing and rebroadcast information for the public.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Washington County Commissioner Meeting February 4, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","At the meeting commissioners approved the consent agenda, multiple purchase requests, several board appointments, interlocal agreements, the RAP appropriation, and a memorandum of agreement for the Warner Valley Reservoir project. All recorded motions passed by voice vote.","taxTitle","Washington County Commission, Washington County Commission and Boards, Washington County, Utah","taxId",19907,"location","Utah","headline","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6349444,"Commissioners approve MOA on historic properties for Warner Valley Reservoir transfer, subject to legal review",115,2750000,2865000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2238601-d1b274d310501278370c9b0176384102&start=2750&end=2865","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2238601-d1b274d310501278370c9b0176384102/thumbnail_2750000.jpg","/articles/6349444/Utah/Commissioners-approve-MOA-on-historic-properties-for-Warner-Valley-Reservoir-transfer-subject-to-legal-review","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6349444-5a6ab8aab274b1f8e3e58ce7a928505f/orig.mp4?Expires=1773573897&Signature=KxXz-Y-I2p66Em67C1dhGppmQWDNcd~ZzxHV3FMqWMgmDXo92npSdQUnc2gEzTzXJ3BGHMmYIkp5XnMtLZNmMuOpqz-sWz7e~-c0PtqHTzRjpgEohPq7z2Mp7RF22Aams6R6zU1n3qklrYKjgBbmWYZAxmBevllT8h6Yxuyb01BOZN0AQP3i55O3nIvXvvwcFvK8o0RXQogAF0jmEUC1H3qnqSAOHv17oiDYG~nyz9aRi74A~4Dyoad9OlTpPxQaoSH2ouXXjordXJEHg74IejycrD5AW-hAGXs14tov-YCTE6zVhYYDDD8drQ51cJaL8wES8~S5D12iyVo~awyntw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Washington County commissioners approved a memorandum of agreement (MOA) that sets out how historic properties will be treated in connection with land transactions required to advance the Warner Valley Reservoir project. The resolution (R2025‑3454) passed after staff asked that final signature language be subject to county legal review and minor edits requested by UDOT.

The nut graf: the MOA implements federally required cultural surveys and treatment plans tied to Bureau of Land Management (BLM) acquisitions and transfers that are part of a long‑running water‑supply effort; the agreement assigns payment of treatment plans to the water district and has the county in a facilitator role.

Devin (county staff) summarized the land exchanges: BLM plans to acquire about 90 acres of private land in a tortoise reserve (Zone 3) and to transfer roughly 900 acres to the water district for the proposed reuse reservoir. Federal law requires cultural surveys for affected parcels; those surveys have identified historic sites that the MOA directs how to treat. Under the agreement the water district will pay for archaeological treatment plans, and the county will participate as facilitator as needed.

Devin also told commissioners that one of the signatory agencies, the Utah Department of Transportation, requested incidental changes to language and asked that the commission’s approval allow the county chair and legal counsel to accept minor edits before final signature. Commissioners approved the resolution with that condition.

Commissioners placed the MOA in a broader context, noting that the county’s Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) obligations are part of the reason the county is involved in exchanges out of the reserve. Staff characterized the project as the product of a lengthy multi‑year federal process and called the MOA one step toward completing land transactions needed for water infrastructure.

Ending: The MOA was approved subject to legal review and chair sign‑off on minor edits; commissioners said additional steps and signatories remain before the land transfers are complete.","The commission approved resolution R2025‑3454 authorizing a memorandum of agreement to address historic‑property treatment tied to a Bureau of Land Management acquisition and proposed transfer of lands for the Warner Valley Reservoir project; approval was subject to final legal review and minor edits requested by UDOT.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6349449,"Commissioners approve RAP‑tax allocations; advisory board warns arts groups remain underfunded",722,2008000,2730000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2238601-d1b274d310501278370c9b0176384102&start=2008&end=2730","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2238601-d1b274d310501278370c9b0176384102/thumbnail_2008000.jpg","/articles/6349449/Utah/Commissioners-approve-RAPtax-allocations-advisory-board-warns-arts-groups-remain-underfunded","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6349449-4f9cc12185dfd6c9c669df22ed4d5664/orig.mp4?Expires=1773573897&Signature=Bu8Q54gzI7Ob9d7I0BpMcxQNWYSp~n6xY2XoVtAS6P~z0L0AYNR5LtjVWSXIJglnSnmgLyP8jQv9PGVqy8s-roH4273M5m4QlJiOZehM--Dp50axxlCU5MgfPvqccGDwh6pyvgEh-zsjZO~mM3Gfm4P~MvNWAcKzZiPvWaRyL9I7lHaz-aqbFSIaq-MKMRk1AU4blXJ6~UXrwtu7Zd0CT4arKoikxuf8jj9RsdiH~6fUKRWFxL5xOCytG7iC2My7zNeNTN6wXrKSeL8otuyl6WS6Ls8d7XVTWwSrGxAqYvv6igZeEUV7fIItKxlEZrztpFebmjlZ8itMilhrbOHxSw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Washington County commissioners approved a resolution adopting the Recreation, Arts and Parks (RAP) advisory board’s recommended appropriations from the county’s 15% share of the RAP sales tax. The resolution (R2025‑3453) was approved by unanimous voice vote after board members and volunteers described the application process and urged more funding for arts organizations.

The RAP tax is a one‑tenth‑of‑one‑percent local sales tax. Commissioners were told that 85% of the collections are distributed to municipalities by point‑of‑sale and population and that the remaining 15% is reserved for cultural organizations; the RAP advisory board reviews applications and makes funding recommendations to the commission.

The nut graf: advisory board members told commissioners that arts organizations face a recurring budgeting mismatch because applications are submitted in the fall while funds are actually distributed in the next fiscal year; the board recommended allocations that commissioners adopted and said they plan to revisit reserve policy and possible increases in next year’s appropriation.

Tony Allen, a volunteer who helped evaluate applications, told commissioners the board receives 40–50 applications annually that together commonly total about $640,000 in requests. He said the RAP renewal on the November ballot passed by about 60% and that, with the tax now renewed for another 10 years, the board proposed scenario budgets in the $650,000–$750,000 range for planning. Allen urged commissioners to view arts funding as “social and cultural capital” that supports community identity.

County staff member Nicole (surname not fully specified in the transcript) summarized the process: applications are due in September, the advisory board evaluates them in October and November, and the county pays awarded funds in the first quarter of the following year. The advisory board asked commissioners to consider a reserve policy now that the tax has been renewed.

One commissioner stated a conflict of interest on the record, saying they are the vice chair of a local musical theater organization; that conflict was noted during discussion. Commissioners indicated they would develop a reserve policy and that, with the tax renewal, they expect to allocate more funds next year.

Ending: Board recommendations were approved as presented by unanimous vote; commissioners and RAP volunteers said they will revisit allocation policy and reserves in future budget work.
","Washington County commissioners approved the Recreation, Arts and Parks (RAP) advisory board’s recommendations for the county’s 15% share of the RAP sales tax. RAP board members urged larger appropriations next year and described timing and budgeting stresses for arts organizations.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6349456,"Washington County bee inspector reports mite problems after 116 hive inspections in 2024",130,285000,415000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2238601-d1b274d310501278370c9b0176384102&start=285&end=415","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2238601-d1b274d310501278370c9b0176384102/thumbnail_285000.jpg","/articles/6349456/Utah/Washington-County-bee-inspector-reports-mite-problems-after-116-hive-inspections-in-2024","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6349456-6ed1de0663a042536f187b07fe2a0a87/orig.mp4?Expires=1773573897&Signature=BBAQQnagR5b5eI0E1o3Z6M6ULEzTe14IfqFd1qZGeqoz6Z1BHkEH7SsweOgE-9DCfzPdFQEGM7hxBB5eZegOVu3Mwut9w8FBkcnQOXerHoLWmgoEsDY5JF5HQyW8mjAu9wBPKkYukWljVZCqBi44cAsvouD69XdTP6Ao1gTlMxKVV80NYIX9adKymU9UdqaaVpILxDCjnKyzZAmo8dbMbDAbSsdZjo5YHw6hJiphNCGSoeCJb30JKkg7LYir~ca0XqVrg4NeQd4uU5aCuasG~Hbj56TwTZOvuBO6RU8IuxHub93G-p4uxg5cPezfGUA2wlK~YLh6DbAAQrycJccq1g__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Blaine Nay, the Washington County bee inspector, told the County Commission that he inspected 23 apiaries and a total of 116 honey bee colonies in 2024 and found both European and American foulbrood as well as colonies with high parasitic-mite counts.

Nay said Utah’s inspection law, adopted in 1992, requires counties to appoint inspectors to monitor honey bee health and that his work focuses on detecting contagious diseases and teaching beekeepers how to manage mites and other problems. He said state testing for disease is available to registered beekeepers at no cost and that inspectors aim to sample at least 10% of a keeper’s colonies when there is reason to suspect disease.

The nut graf: healthy honey bees are important to local agriculture and garden pollination, and county-level inspection and early detection reduce the risk of larger, more destructive outbreaks.

Nay told commissioners that European foulbrood, a bacterial disease treatable with antibiotics, was detected in some colonies. He said American foulbrood — which leaves long‑lived spores and cannot be cured by antibiotics — was also confirmed in at least one yard. In that yard he said four colonies tested positive and the beekeeper chose to destroy affected colonies; at one point 12 infected colonies and some contaminated equipment were double‑bagged and taken to a landfill after burning was not permitted.

Nay said the most serious ongoing problem he sees is parasitic mites and that beekeepers must be trained in treatment methods and monitoring. He described an in‑season metric he uses: he does not want to see mite levels above about 2 percent in his standard sampling (he illustrated this with an example equivalent to roughly six mites in a sample). He also described mitigation steps and equipment sterilization practices used to limit spread between yards.

Nay said the county service is provided by volunteers at no charge to beekeepers; state registration for beekeepers costs $10. He encouraged both registered and unregistered keepers to contact the inspector for advice.

Commissioners thanked Nay for the work and asked a few clarifying questions about the number of inspections and the practical honey yield of a healthy hive.

Ending: Commissioners took no formal action on the presentation; Nay’s information was received and entered into the meeting minutes.","County bee inspector Blaine Nay told commissioners he inspected 23 apiaries and 116 honey bee hives in 2024, found European and American foulbrood in some yards and emphasized mite monitoring and beekeeper education.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: Washington County Commission approves consent agenda, purchase requests and a suite of appointments and resolutions

Commissioners approve MOA on historic properties for Warner Valley Reservoir transfer, subject to legal review

Commissioners approve RAP‑tax allocations; advisory board warns arts groups remain underfunded

Washington County bee inspector reports mite problems after 116 hive inspections in 2024