The Rochester City Council convened on December 17, 2024, to discuss several key issues, primarily focusing on the proposed 79E tax relief application for a new project at 95 South Main Street. The meeting featured a range of opinions from council members and public attendees regarding the implications of granting tax incentives to businesses.

The first significant discussion centered on the 79E application itself. A council member expressed support for the project, suggesting that a five-year tax relief period was appropriate. However, they raised concerns about whether the application could be approved solely on commercial status and highlighted potential issues with parking availability at the site, noting the existing zigzag parking lot behind the building.

Tom Kosinski, a state representative and local resident, voiced strong opposition to the 79E proposal, framing it as a form of corporate welfare that would ultimately lead to a tax increase for residents. He argued that while the project might bring a new hotel and business to Rochester, the financial burden would fall on taxpayers who would be subsidizing the tax breaks for the business. Kosinski pointed out that the property in question was assessed at approximately $2.5 million, and with an expected $3.5 million in improvements, the city would forgo tax revenue on that amount for five years. He emphasized that this arrangement unfairly positioned taxpayers as partners in the business without receiving any dividends.

Another resident echoed these sentiments, questioning the wisdom of continuing to grant tax relief under the 79E program, especially in light of rising inflation and budget constraints. They suggested that the council consider unadopting the provisions of the program, arguing that each tax relief granted shifts the financial burden onto existing taxpayers. This speaker proposed a potential solution where taxpayers who support such incentives could bear the costs directly, allowing for a more equitable distribution of financial responsibilities.

The meeting concluded with a clear divide in opinions regarding the 79E tax relief application. While some council members and residents saw the potential benefits of attracting new businesses, others raised significant concerns about the long-term financial implications for the community. The council's decision on the application remains pending, with further discussions anticipated in future meetings.