Palm Coast residents demand action against training flight school operations over local homes

During a recent Flagler County government meeting, residents voiced significant concerns regarding the financial and operational management of Flagler Executive Airport. The airport is reportedly facing severe financial difficulties, with fiscal reports indicating a deficit of nearly $1 million in 2022 and an alarming projection of close to $2 million in 2023. Community members are questioning who bears the burden of these losses, with many suggesting that taxpayers are unfairly subsidizing the airport's operations.

A key point of contention is the proposed airport overlay program, which has been stalled since 2023. Local citizens, particularly from Palm Coast, are urging officials to reject this ordinance, arguing that it undermines avigation easements and poses safety risks due to the high volume of flight school operations. Residents expressed fears about the safety of low-flying aircraft, particularly those conducting training maneuvers over populated areas without adequate air traffic control.

Darlene Shelley, a Palm Coast resident, emphasized the need for immediate action to protect the community's health and quality of life. She called for amendments to the nuisance noise ordinance to address the excessive noise generated by flight schools, which she claims disrupts daily life and lowers property values. Shelley proposed that the county impose fees on low approach and touch-and-go maneuvers to mitigate these issues.

Another resident, Celia Pugliese, reflected on the airport's history and the growing problems associated with the flight schools. She criticized the lack of safety measures and questioned the rationale behind continued financial support for an airport that is not benefiting the local community.

The meeting highlighted a growing frustration among residents regarding the airport's management and its impact on their lives. As discussions continue, community members are calling for greater accountability and regulation to ensure their safety and well-being. The concerns raised during this meeting reflect a broader desire for local government to prioritize the needs and safety of its residents over the interests of the airport and its associated businesses.