During the Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks (KDWP) Commission Meeting on January 30, 2025, a heated discussion emerged surrounding the proposed expansion of night vision hunting for coyotes. The conversation highlighted the tension between wildlife management practices and the rights of law-abiding hunters in the state.
Commissioners emphasized their belief that the majority of Kansas hunters are responsible and follow the rules. One commissioner argued that restricting these hunters due to the actions of a minority would be unjust. "Hunters, by and large, are law abiding," he stated, reinforcing the idea that the backbone of Kansas hunting culture is built on compliance with regulations.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free The meeting also touched on the role of the USDA in wildlife management, particularly regarding coyote control. While acknowledging that USDA shooters are employed in other states, the discussion questioned the effectiveness of such measures in Kansas. One commissioner expressed skepticism about the use of government-funded shooters, suggesting that it may not be a beneficial approach to wildlife management.
As the meeting progressed, the focus shifted back to the potential expansion of night vision hunting. Proponents argued that there is no evidence to suggest that this practice would harm coyote populations or their habitats. They pointed out that the constitutional right to hunt is strongly supported by Kansas voters, with a significant majority favoring hunting rights in past ballot initiatives.
The commissioners agreed to continue evaluating public comments and research on the matter, but one commissioner firmly stated, "There is literally not one reason that this rule promulgation wouldn't go forward at this point." He urged for action, citing the lack of negative impact on wildlife and the strong desire among hunters to engage in this practice.
As discussions continue, the KDWP Commission faces the challenge of balancing wildlife management with the rights of hunters, while also considering public sentiment on hunting practices in Kansas. The outcome of this proposal could significantly shape the future of hunting regulations in the state.