Consultant Daniel Anderson faces violations for coordinated campaign spending with Supervisor Preston

A significant violation of campaign finance laws was highlighted during a recent San Francisco government meeting, centering on coordinated spending between a political committee and Supervisor Dean Preston's campaign. The case involves the Labor and Working Families Slate, which allegedly turned an independent expenditure into an illegal contribution through improper coordination.

The discussion revealed that Daniel Anderson, a consultant for the committee, communicated with a staff member from Preston's campaign regarding the timing and content of campaign materials. This coordination led to the production of flyers that not only supported certain candidates but also included a vague message urging voters to "vote no" on Bilal Mahmood, who was running against Preston. The flyers were deemed to have benefited Preston's campaign, as they were printed after the agreement on dissemination was made.

The total cost of the flyers was reported at $6,968, with $2,613 of that amount benefiting Preston's campaign, exceeding the legal contribution limit of $500. This resulted in two violations: one for exceeding the contribution limit and another for misreporting the spending as an independent expenditure rather than a contribution. The penalties for these violations were set at $400.

The meeting underscored the importance of adhering to campaign finance laws to ensure a level playing field for all candidates. The discussion also noted that there was no evidence that Preston's campaign was aware of the specifics of the coordinated communication, which played a crucial role in the decision not to charge his campaign directly.

As the city continues to navigate complex campaign finance regulations, officials emphasized the need for clarity and compliance to prevent future violations.