The Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners held a regular meeting on February 7, 2025, where the contentious issue of water fluoridation was a focal point of discussion. Several speakers voiced their concerns regarding the health implications of adding fluoride to the public water supply, citing recent studies and legal rulings that question the safety and necessity of this practice.
A prominent speaker, a local educator, highlighted the potential negative effects of fluoride on children's cognitive development, referencing over 70 studies linking high fluoride exposure to lower IQs. This speaker emphasized the importance of considering the long-term health impacts on children, particularly those consuming formula made with fluoridated water. The speaker also pointed to a recent federal court ruling that deemed the current fluoride levels in water an "unreasonable risk" to children's health.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Sign up for free Amanda Bruno, an herbalist and wellness advocate, echoed these concerns, arguing that fluoride disrupts the endocrine system and may contribute to fertility issues. She called for transparency and informed consent regarding the addition of fluoride to public water, questioning the necessity of this long-standing policy.
Laura Hartman, a combat veteran and healthcare professional, criticized the practice as "medicine without consent," emphasizing that fluoride is not FDA-approved for ingestion and poses risks that are not adequately communicated to the public. She urged the commissioners to reconsider the ethical implications of mass fluoridation without individual consent.
Jeffrey Cobbs and Pat Metcalfe also contributed to the discussion, with Metcalfe highlighting the classification of fluoride as a neurotoxin and questioning the safety of its use in public water systems. Metcalfe pointed out that fluoride is a byproduct of industrial processes and not a naturally occurring mineral, raising concerns about its long-term health effects.
Angel Ramos concluded the public comments by urging immediate action to halt fluoridation, citing the lack of informed consent and the potential risks to vulnerable populations, particularly children and low-income families.
The meeting underscored a growing movement within the community to reassess the practice of water fluoridation, with speakers calling for a reevaluation of public health policies in light of emerging scientific evidence. The commissioners are now faced with the challenge of addressing these concerns while balancing public health initiatives with community input and safety.