Commissioners criticize DNR's involvement in solar project approvals in Carolina

Concerns over solar energy regulations took center stage at the Caroline County Commissioners Meeting on February 11, 2025, as officials voiced their frustrations regarding state agency involvement in local planning decisions. The discussion highlighted a growing tension between county authorities and the Maryland Department of Natural Resources (DNR) over the approval processes for solar projects.

Commissioner Breeding expressed discontent with the recent Public Service Commission (PSC) hearing, noting a lack of meaningful discussion and questioning the qualifications of the presiding judge, who was unfamiliar with battery storage technology. This raised alarms about the oversight of solar projects, particularly the Chaborden project, which currently lacks battery storage capabilities.

The commissioners emphasized the need for clarity on the role of DNR and other state agencies in the approval process. They questioned why DNR would intervene in local decisions, especially when local planning regulations seem to be overlooked. "I don't understand how we've got an agency who's basically overriding our decision," one commissioner remarked, highlighting the perceived disconnect between state and local governance.

The meeting also touched on a pending bill in the General Assembly that could restrict counties from enacting zoning laws against certain solar installations. This proposed legislation has prompted the Maryland Association of Counties (MAKO) to take a stance against it, indicating a unified pushback from local governments against state overreach.

As the commissioners prepare for further discussions, the implications of these regulatory challenges could significantly impact the future of solar energy development in Caroline County. The outcome of the proposed bill and the ongoing dialogue with state agencies will be crucial in shaping local energy policies.