[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6694492,"mediaKeyId","2259922-dfd2779d2512ca96cddef51e6311d15f","parentId",2259922,"title","Council approves Hasik Townhome final plat; developer adds sidewalk link to Heron Park","audioSeconds",1338,"startMs",4038000,"endMs",5376000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2259922-dfd2779d2512ca96cddef51e6311d15f&start=4038&end=5376","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2259922-dfd2779d2512ca96cddef51e6311d15f/thumbnail_4038000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6694492/Garden-City/Ada-County/Idaho/Council-approves-Hasik-Townhome-final-plat-developer-adds-sidewalk-link-to-Heron-Park","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6694492-f08cac77293b9c665a0c8446c1d4297a/orig.mp4?Expires=1775714740&Signature=fPCFLfp1bcKvRlFlZXVmosKNuf3MIFeaUj1EZGESRSduZln~eHKJgmxJM-zgFTCAVzY5PM9FO1pOzSNVTGpSrZAdazy306tFfgp8afD9uDsx4AfFDcFC0IK-0ZatHyhTagTMe-aOthwUSZ1yI3yr-Q7l6DVC~uW33rJIiViolU-dnRLqyTleZGooCekyIefh3a-2hi5s33IruTCLqnoEzwmB5JKNpE-~4BIXtp6RIORdS22HyO~0snSD0Rbos0Ss7uzAW7M3iMLzDZGKTuKkPE0AwXby03qlMY3J33OcrVVJY12mM9XU0pEIcRxZaeP80P~aEJhqoi9fQ3yAkv3F-A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Garden City","date","2025-02-11T19:08:24.937Z","article","Garden City — The Garden City Council approved the final plat for the Hasik Townhome subdivision (SUBFY2022‑2) at a Jan. 27 public hearing after the applicant revised the layout to reduce buildable lots and add a public pedestrian connection to Heron Park and the city Greenbelt.

Jeff Hatch of Hatch Design Architecture presented the final plat and said the developer reduced buildable lots from six to five to allow more side‑by‑side parking and to improve circulation for families. Hatch said the new final plat includes a redesigned public connection to Heron Park that links to the Greenbelt, a small seating area at the park entry, bike racks and a bike repair station.

The nut graf: the council found the final plat to be in substantial compliance with the preliminary plat and approved the final plat with conditions covering landscaping, sidewalk configuration and protection of city‑owned trees.

Staff review and conditions

City staff and the development services director, Jenna Thornborough, told the council that the applicant had worked with staff to relocate the pedestrian connection so the subdivision would better connect to the existing parking and sidewalk at Heron Park. Staff noted several specific conditions and technical points:

- Sidewalk width: The proposed private/public walkway is five feet wide (reduced from an earlier eight‑foot concept). A six‑foot landscape strip runs in front of the sidewalk; staff said the strip may need widening if Ada County Highway District (ACHD) policies require larger street tree spacing and soil volumes.

- Landscaping and mini‑park: The applicant proposed a small plaza/mini‑park and a landscape buffer between some duplex pairs; staff asked that final landscaping be adjusted so the space functions as a usable public area rather than only rock or mulch.

- Trees: An arborist report identified trees that appear to be on city property. Staff noted removal of trees on city property is not permitted without council approval and the applicant affirmed it had no intention of removing city trees without authorization.

Council action and vote

Councilmember [motion maker not specified] moved to approve the final plat; the motion was seconded. The roll call vote was recorded as: Councilmember Jorgensen — yes; Councilmember Page — yes; Councilmember Rasmussen — yes; Councilmember Jacobs — yes. The motion carried and the final plat was approved with the staff‑recommended conditions.

Why it matters

The approved changes reduce density slightly and prioritize a direct public connection to Heron Park and the Greenbelt, which staff and the applicant said improves pedestrian safety and future circulation as nearby areas densify. The conditions allow staff to work with the applicant on final landscaping, and ACHD review may require minor sidewalk revisions.

Clarifying details

The developer reduced buildable lots from six to five to improve parking layout and family‑friendly circulation. The final plat maintains a central pedestrian pathway but converts an earlier breezeway to a landscaped buffer (staff termed passage through that buffer a trespass). The final plat remains subject to ACHD standards for street trees and may need a wider planting strip if ACHD requires it.

Provenance and next steps

The public hearing opened Jan. 27 and staff and the applicant addressed council questions during the hearing; the final plat approval is effective per the council’s roll call. The applicant and staff will finalize landscaping and any adjustments required by ACHD or the city before plat recording.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","January 27, 2025, City Council meeting","oneSentenceSummary","Garden City approved the final plat for the Hasik Townhome subdivision, which reduces the number of buildable lots and adds a pedestrian connection to Heron Park and the Greenbelt.","taxTitle","Garden City, Ada County, Idaho","taxId",8565,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6694497,"Army Corps flood study offers a range of costly options to reduce Garden City flood risk",3295,101000,3396000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2259922-dfd2779d2512ca96cddef51e6311d15f&start=101&end=3396","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2259922-dfd2779d2512ca96cddef51e6311d15f/thumbnail_101000.jpg","/articles/6694497/Garden-City/Ada-County/Idaho/Army-Corps-flood-study-offers-a-range-of-costly-options-to-reduce-Garden-City-flood-risk","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6694497-a861996b4ec8b3a241076087342c0d38/orig.mp4?Expires=1775714740&Signature=GasXMKfz1PITxxzB1~4h97l5SzR8mKW23QbZw7SQJOat63qtmAWxkmJMYRJwEXczDEf3q8Ok7CqNr0Re8uQ0spFUtAsyCXvo-PYNeqenK0lCj2ZfOixOquT7T8MJ6ejvAkxZvPvD7PF4XjDWwryCX1NFWOIxvhBLYcCEwA8prARw1YbhacC3J59YxfS2rrbjiRiFOyVL8C4SpBqUzpixLObqX8NOLf7e0CgQA0yr5A4ei8rWOMfifBZULWB7pJJvr68kLSK4jj2BTwzmKN2jp220kSAs6Oi9NcQzrdLEEvgfm7X3WBtchLGJ1I-KUMbPU-7Ar9Q7aUxg~~24rJH7JQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Garden City — City engineers and consultants updated the Garden City City Council on a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers general investigation (GI) flood study that used a new two‑dimensional hydraulic model of the Boise River and presented five alternatives to reduce flood risk.

The city engineer, Joe Canning, and Nick Krause, principal with QRS Consulting, told the council on Jan. 27 that the Corps’ newest 2D model is more detailed and, in their assessment, less conservative than the Corps’ 2016 draft mapping. The 2016 draft would have placed roughly 73% of Garden City in the 100‑year floodplain; the Corps’ latest model shows more localized street flooding in many areas instead of widespread property inundation.

The study’s nut graf: the Corps has produced a more precise hydraulic model and a draft integrated feasibility report that identifies several approaches to lowering flood risk. Those options range from a comprehensive structural plan of levees and walls to narrow, targeted barriers in the highest‑damage locations — and a hybrid that relies on temporary flood barriers that would require rapid city deployment during a flood event.

Most important findings and context

Joe Canning, the city engineer, said the difference between the 2003 FEMA maps and the 2016 draft maps was substantial, with base flood elevations (BFEs) rising by about 1 to 3 feet in places and greatly expanding the area inside the 100‑year floodplain. Garden City negotiated seclusion after the 2016 maps, meaning FEMA has not adopted those draft boundaries while the city pursues mitigation measures.

Nick Krause said the Corps’ 2D model (based on 2019 survey data and updated bathymetry) is “the best model I’ve seen in the Boise River” and yields different flood footprints than the earlier 1D work. Krause and Canning showed maps indicating the Corps’ options would remove many of the shallow, low‑depth street flooding areas from the highest‑damage classification, while channelized high‑depth flow locations would remain the priority for permanent protection.

What the Corps proposed

- Structural alternative: continuous levees and flood walls along the river that Corps staff estimate at roughly $170 million in total construction costs. The Corps’ estimate includes a local cost share; the presentation cited a Garden City local share figure in the tens of millions (the Corps’ cost‑share accounting and some land‑acquisition costs are called out separately by the presenters).

- Light structural alternative: reduced length of permanent walls/levees combined with limited roadway and channel modifications. Estimated total cost and local share presented in the briefing were substantially lower than the full structural plan (presenters cited a range that placed the city’s share in the mid‑eight‑figure range depending on options).

- Ultralight structural alternative: similar to the light structural plan but substituting temporary or deployable barriers (for example, HESCO baskets, sandbags or water‑filled inflatable dams) in some locations to reduce permanent construction. Presenters stressed that temporary measures do not change FEMA flood maps or flood insurance requirements because they are not permanent measures.

- Most damages / targeted alternative: Corps staff produced a lower‑cost option that installs permanent protection only at a few high‑risk, channelized outflow locations (three levee/flood‑wall segments the Corps identified in midtown and downstream of Riverside). That alternative carries a smaller local share (presenters referenced an example Garden City cost share near $14–15 million) but would protect fewer parcels.

- Do‑nothing: includes the option of accepting the 2016 draft FEMA maps (and their higher BFEs) or pursuing ad hoc local measures.

Costs, insurance and operational limits

Krause and Canning emphasized tradeoffs: permanent structural work can change the FEMA maps and thereby potentially lower flood insurance obligations for properties that become protected; temporary measures generally reduce risk only during any given event if deployed successfully and do not alter flood insurance designations. As Krause put it during the meeting, “That is correct. Yeah. And flood insurance cost would not change,” when asked whether temporary barriers would result in lower premiums.

Presenters also discussed operational challenges for a temporary‑barrier approach: stockpiling materials (HESCO barriers fold flat but require gravel to fill), storage space, refill or one‑time use issues, the speed of deployment relative to forecast lead time, training and turnover of staff, and the cost of replenishing disposable materials after an event.

Technical benchmarks and examples

- The Corps’ 2D model and maps were produced from updated surveys and 2019 data, and presenters praised hydrologic modeling work by Corps staff and contractors.
- Nick Krause identified the 100‑year flow at the Glenwood gauge as about 16,600 cubic feet per second (cfs); 2017 peak flows reached about 9,800 cfs in Garden City, and historic high flows (1983) approached 25,000 cfs in the valley.

Local next steps and decision points

Presenters and staff said the Corps is moving toward peer review and a decision about a tentatively selected plan. The Corps is looking for a city preference among the alternatives as it finalizes the integrated feasibility report. City staff indicated they want access to the Corps’ model so the city can run its own scenarios and refine options. Mayor Evans and staff said the Corps and city have a high‑level meeting scheduled the week of Feb. 13, and staff (including Canning and internal staff) anticipate returning to the council with updates in mid‑February.

Why it matters

Council members and staff repeatedly stressed the stakes: a change to FEMA‑adopted base flood elevations would affect development rules and flood insurance obligations across Garden City. The Corps’ modeling refines—but does not eliminate—the risk, and the council will need to weigh public cost share, permanence of protection, impacts to riverside vegetation and greenbelt access, and operational feasibility of any emergency deployment plan.

What the Corps study did not decide

There was no council vote on the Corps alternatives on Jan. 27. Presenters and staff recommended further technical work, access to the Corps’ model, and additional council discussion before the city commits to any option. Corps staff are constrained by federal program rules, including criteria for benefit‑to‑cost and allowable cost shares.

Ending note

City staff said they will continue to coordinate with the Corps, seek model access for local scenario analysis and return to the council with specifics about funding options, potential land or easement impacts, and refined cost estimates.","City engineers and the U.S. Army Corps’ draft study provide new two‑dimensional modeling showing lower—but still significant—flood exposure than a 2016 draft map; Corps options range from targeted levees to temporary barriers with Garden City share estimates from about $14 million to tens of millions of dollars.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6694487,"Council votes: consent agenda, appointment of development director, library internet and surplus property resolutions",131,5384000,5515000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2259922-dfd2779d2512ca96cddef51e6311d15f&start=5384&end=5515","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2259922-dfd2779d2512ca96cddef51e6311d15f/thumbnail_5384000.jpg","/articles/6694487/Garden-City/Ada-County/Idaho/Council-votes-consent-agenda-appointment-of-development-director-library-internet-and-surplus-property-resolutions","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6694487-2279ac56c5adc6a951e6fa961e05a272/orig.mp4?Expires=1775714740&Signature=GYVBQqQmLGosv9xzxH6xknpnoywvNGNNogHYKQIRYk4ORqzrQM-GuPKhLoxod8CY2fbacMkYPrk2dPrmC08angUcNe90esGhlI1wdceXlqFmIEivbpHeLzaPhTe2gmjvEHv4s8-S7Maug9aaRLnjXuX0tNZC00FugPbONvdVDIzilvRY1JYJr1wse0IHBW4~IDaXXZURwoFX2XeHS3qCu~xzLvaHc0k~10imOeV0zeLQYb~P2hUyO6h3CcMEatTLML-uuHATNlhD~YiFKLgFgeZXRRBnp9c3AFEGYvN-T6-8brgMcO9AxzaPdCkFy32SebwTXgSwxUqrfFz6xZm4vw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Garden City — The Garden City City Council took several procedural and consent votes at its Jan. 27 meeting, approving the consent agenda, confirming a city appointment and passing two routine resolutions.

Highlights

- Consent agenda: The council approved the consent agenda by voice/roll call early in the meeting.

- Appointment: The council confirmed Jenna Thornborough as Garden City’s development services director. The confirmation was moved and seconded; the roll call vote recorded Councilmember Jacobs, Councilmember Jorgensen, Councilmember Page and Councilmember Rasmussen as voting yes.

- Resolution 1196‑25 (library internet services): The council approved an amended resolution authorizing a 60‑month internet services contract for the library that includes a non‑appropriation clause. Director Wadhams described the housekeeping amendment; the resolution passed by roll call.

- Resolution 1197‑25 (surplus property): The council approved a routine resolution declaring specified city property surplus.

Vote details and next steps

The motions to approve these items passed by roll call; council members recorded as voting yes on the recorded resolutions and the appointment were Councilmember Page, Councilmember Rasmussen, Councilmember Jacobs and Councilmember Jorgensen. Each item will proceed under standard city contracting and administrative procedures (library internet services will be implemented by library staff and procurement; surplus property disposition will proceed per the resolution direction).

Why it matters

These votes enact routine administrative steps: they confirm a senior city appointment, enable a multi‑year contract for library internet service (with the standard non‑appropriation financial language required for contracts longer than one year) and clear surplus property for disposition.","At its Jan. 27 meeting the Garden City City Council approved the consent agenda and voted to confirm Jenna Thornborough as development services director; it also passed two resolutions covering library internet services (Resolution 1196‑25) and surplus property (Resolution 1197‑25).","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Council approves Hasik Townhome final plat; developer adds sidewalk link to Heron Park

Army Corps flood study offers a range of costly options to reduce Garden City flood risk

Council votes: consent agenda, appointment of development director, library internet and surplus property resolutions