California mandates ignition interlock device for convicted drivers under new legislation

California Assembly Bill 366, introduced on February 3, 2025, aims to enhance road safety by mandating the installation of certified ignition interlock devices for individuals convicted of driving under the influence (DUI). This legislation seeks to address the persistent issue of repeat DUI offenses, which pose significant risks to public safety.

The bill outlines several key provisions. Upon conviction, individuals will be required to install a functioning ignition interlock device on any vehicle they operate. They must notify the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) within 30 days of installation and provide proof through a designated verification form. Additionally, the bill stipulates that these devices must be serviced and recalibrated every 60 days to ensure proper functioning. A restriction will be placed on the driver’s license record, indicating that the individual may only operate vehicles equipped with these devices.

Notably, the bill includes exemptions for individuals who do not own or have access to a vehicle, provided they certify their circumstances to the DMV. This provision aims to ensure that those without vehicle access are not unduly burdened by the requirements.

Debate surrounding AB 366 has centered on its potential effectiveness in reducing DUI recidivism rates. Proponents argue that the mandatory use of ignition interlock devices can significantly deter repeat offenses and enhance public safety. Critics, however, raise concerns about the financial burden on individuals required to install and maintain these devices, as well as the administrative challenges for the DMV in monitoring compliance.

The implications of AB 366 extend beyond individual accountability; it reflects California's broader commitment to addressing impaired driving and its consequences. Experts suggest that if implemented effectively, the bill could lead to a decrease in DUI-related incidents, ultimately saving lives and reducing costs associated with accidents and law enforcement.

As the bill progresses through the legislative process, stakeholders will be closely monitoring its potential impact on both public safety and the lives of those affected by DUI convictions. The outcome of AB 366 could set a precedent for similar legislation in other states, emphasizing the importance of proactive measures in combating impaired driving.