The Tennessee State Legislature convened on February 5, 2025, to introduce Senate Bill 75, a legislative measure aimed at amending the state's existing laws regarding the Interstate Earthquake Compact of 1988. The bill, proposed by Senator Jackson, seeks to terminate the compact and related governmental entities by June 30, 2033.

The primary purpose of Senate Bill 75 is to streamline state governance by eliminating the Interstate Earthquake Compact, which was established to facilitate cooperation among member states in earthquake preparedness and response. The bill proposes to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically targeting Section 4-29-246(a) and adding a new section, 4-29-254, which outlines the termination of the compact and any state entities created in 2031.

Key provisions of the bill include the explicit termination of the Interstate Earthquake Compact and the stipulation that any governmental entities formed in 2031 will also cease to exist by the same date. However, the bill allows for the possibility of reestablishing or restructuring these entities in the future, should the need arise.

Debate surrounding Senate Bill 75 has focused on the implications of dissolving the compact, particularly in light of Tennessee's vulnerability to seismic activity. Critics argue that dismantling the compact could hinder the state's preparedness for potential earthquakes, while supporters contend that the measure is necessary for reducing bureaucratic overhead and improving efficiency in state governance.

The economic and social implications of this bill are significant, as it raises questions about the state's readiness to respond to natural disasters. Experts in emergency management have expressed concerns that the termination of the compact may lead to gaps in coordination and resource sharing among states, potentially jeopardizing public safety.

As the bill progresses through the legislative process, its future remains uncertain. If passed, it could reshape Tennessee's approach to earthquake preparedness and response, prompting a reevaluation of how the state manages its disaster readiness initiatives. The General Assembly will continue to deliberate on the bill, weighing the benefits of streamlined governance against the potential risks to public safety.