Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

House Bill 156 mandates sex designation for high school athletic teams

February 10, 2025 | House Bills (Introduced), 2025 Bills, Maryland Legislation Bills Collections, Maryland


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

House Bill 156 mandates sex designation for high school athletic teams
Maryland's House Bill 156, introduced on February 10, 2025, is stirring significant debate as it seeks to establish strict guidelines for high school athletics based on biological sex. The bill mandates that all interscholastic and intramural athletic teams in public and certain nonpublic high schools be designated explicitly as male, female, or coeducational, effectively barring transgender girls from competing on girls' teams.

The legislation defines "student of the female sex" and "student of the male sex" based on biological sex, a move that proponents argue is necessary to ensure fair competition in women's sports. Supporters, including some parents and advocacy groups, claim that the bill protects the integrity of female athletics and ensures equal opportunities for biological females.

However, the bill has faced fierce opposition from LGBTQ+ advocates and civil rights organizations, who argue that it discriminates against transgender students and undermines their rights to participate in sports. Critics contend that the legislation could lead to increased mental health issues among transgender youth and further marginalize an already vulnerable population.

Notably, the bill includes provisions that protect schools from complaints or investigations regarding their adherence to these new regulations, raising concerns about accountability and the potential for discrimination claims. Additionally, it allows students deprived of athletic opportunities due to violations of the bill to pursue civil action against their schools.

The implications of House Bill 156 extend beyond the sports arena, touching on broader social and political issues surrounding gender identity and equality. As the bill moves through the legislative process, it is poised to ignite further discussions about the balance between fair competition and inclusivity in education and athletics.

As Maryland lawmakers prepare for upcoming debates, the future of House Bill 156 remains uncertain, with potential ramifications for students, schools, and the state's approach to gender in sports.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Maryland articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI