Minnesota introduces educational savings accounts for eligible students and families

On February 10, 2025, the Maine State Legislature introduced House Bill 19, aimed at establishing an Education Savings Account (ESA) program for eligible students in the state. The bill seeks to provide financial support for families choosing nonpublic education options, including nonpublic schools and online learning programs, as well as public high schools and community colleges offering individual courses.

Key provisions of House Bill 19 outline that eligible students must reside in Maine and come from households with an annual income not exceeding four times the income standard for reduced-price meals under the National School Lunch Act. The bill sets an initial cap on participation at five percent of the previous year's public school average daily membership, with a planned increase of three percent annually.

Notably, the bill prioritizes student selection for the ESA program, favoring those entering kindergarten, students who attended public schools in the previous year, siblings of current ESA participants, and other eligible students. However, parents providing instruction at home will not be reimbursed for their time, a point that has sparked some debate among stakeholders.

Opposition to House Bill 19 has emerged from various education advocacy groups, who argue that the bill could divert essential funding from public schools and exacerbate educational inequities. Proponents, however, assert that the ESA program will empower families with more educational choices and foster competition among schools.

The implications of this legislation are significant, as it could reshape the educational landscape in Maine by expanding access to alternative education options. Experts suggest that if passed, the bill may lead to increased enrollment in nonpublic education settings, potentially impacting public school funding and resources.

As discussions continue, the Maine State Legislature will need to weigh the benefits of educational choice against the potential risks to public education funding and equity. The outcome of House Bill 19 will likely set a precedent for future educational policies in the state.