Mister Blanch outlines strategies to combat rising crime and ensure antitrust enforcement

During a recent government meeting in Utah, key discussions centered on the nomination of candidates for the Department of Justice (DOJ) and their strategies for addressing rising crime rates and antitrust issues. Senator Lee initiated the dialogue by questioning nominee Mr. Blanch about his plans to combat the ongoing crime wave, particularly violent crime, which has surged across the nation in recent years.

Mr. Blanch emphasized the importance of empowering U.S. Attorneys to collaborate with federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies. He highlighted the need for a coordinated approach to tackle crime in both urban and rural communities, asserting that the DOJ has the resources and personnel necessary to make a significant impact. His experience as a federal prosecutor, particularly in cases involving gang-related activities, positions him well to lead these efforts if confirmed.

The conversation then shifted to antitrust law, with Senator Lee asking Mr. Blanch to clarify the distinction between enforcement and regulation. Mr. Blanch explained that strong antitrust enforcement serves as a preventive measure against market monopolization, likening it to a scalpel that targets specific anti-competitive behaviors, while regulation acts more broadly like a sledgehammer. He argued that effective enforcement can lead to better compliance and lower costs for the government.

Mrs. Slater, another nominee, addressed the ongoing investigations into major tech companies such as Google and Amazon. She acknowledged the continuity of these cases from the previous administration and expressed her commitment to holding these companies accountable under antitrust laws. She plans to familiarize herself with the current litigation and ensure that the DOJ has the necessary resources to pursue these complex cases.

The meeting also touched on the issue of politicization within the DOJ. Mr. Blanch firmly stated that politics should play no role in the Department's operations, emphasizing the need to restore credibility and trust in the institution. He acknowledged the damage caused by perceived political influences in recent years and committed to maintaining the integrity of the DOJ if confirmed.

Overall, the discussions highlighted a clear focus on addressing crime and enforcing antitrust laws, with nominees expressing a commitment to collaboration, accountability, and the restoration of public trust in the justice system. As these nominees await confirmation, their proposed strategies could significantly shape the DOJ's approach to these pressing issues.