Scranton residents demand federal investigation into sewer authority sale mismanagement

In a recent Scranton City Council meeting, residents voiced significant concerns regarding local governance, infrastructure, and community welfare. The discussions highlighted a growing frustration with the management of city resources and the perceived lack of accountability among elected officials.

One of the most pressing issues raised was the sale of the Scranton Sewer Authority, which former Mayor Bill Courtright facilitated to support the city's pension funds. Residents expressed that this decision has led to unaffordable water and sewer bills, severely impacting their quality of life. A speaker called for a reversal of the sale and suggested using eminent domain to reclaim the sewer authority and the city's water system, emphasizing the need for action to benefit residents.

Another contentious topic was the petition presented by Bob Bolles, which included over 24,000 signatures demanding the removal of Biden signs from the city and the renaming of Spruce Street to Central Scranton Expressway. Bolles criticized the council for not allowing a grieving mother, who lost her son due to the "kids for cash" scandal, to speak at the meeting. He questioned the validity of the signatures, suggesting many were printed rather than handwritten, and warned that legal action might be necessary if the council does not respond to the petition.

Concerns about city operations were also raised, particularly regarding the closure of City Hall during a recent snowstorm while other city departments remained operational. This led to accusations of insensitivity towards residents facing a proposed 33% tax increase.

Additionally, the future of local healthcare was discussed, with suggestions that the medical college should acquire the two hospitals in Scranton to ensure they remain community assets rather than being sold to outside entities. This proposal aimed to leverage state and federal funding to enhance local healthcare services.

The meeting underscored a palpable tension between residents and city officials, with calls for greater transparency and responsiveness to community needs. As the council faces mounting pressure to address these issues, the implications for Scranton's governance and community trust remain significant. The next steps from the council will be closely watched by residents eager for change and accountability.