[{"_1":2,"_124":-5,"_125":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,100,112],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6331859,"mediaKeyId","2309525-d48c50d7e31781ecc20963bb7e620f8b","parentId",2309525,"title","Senate panel backs bill to pause county rezoning actions when majority of supervisors turn over","audioSeconds",729,"startMs",1680000,"endMs",2409000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2309525-d48c50d7e31781ecc20963bb7e620f8b&start=1680&end=2409","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2309525-d48c50d7e31781ecc20963bb7e620f8b/thumbnail_1680000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6331859/Arizona/Senate-panel-backs-bill-to-pause-county-rezoning-actions-when-majority-of-supervisors-turn-over","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6331859-c8abe320d334e69a9dee5df51f685fe0/orig.mp4?Expires=1776546785&Signature=hcozV0zCoqN9wvGH6DD-wjfizJNVvm42s6AUjo8cg2mSvH5qq46ERQxsGZqWWO3ck3rSM3oo1LL6J4Yl5QBttpPoyj5WhZT8JCLWip0i1L23PYtL0YuiV9ZniEACA2a88NDIerhT1pdzFanBUWTj0QQ15Rreek55gFEb-xR4Ra~582bSQ85MlxQ5oUn-kbKRx8Wn~iMV-MhuD7JkdYVT-8jS1~EuywyTeztH3ptsSI1t1T4sAXLyWvIQlsroRXsl8kxoIPfthqdrgVfDzubHi52cR5PjCTOd~J~trTFsbtXhhbbgZCrTVvlo0QfqAjq3DDJHgpxz2R5Aghh35pzPCw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Arizona Legislature","date","2025-02-12T00:00:00Z","article","The Senate Committee on Government voted to recommend Senate Bill 13‑17, a narrowly drawn measure that would delay the effectiveness of county rezoning actions if a majority of county supervisors change as a result of an election.

Sponsor Senator Mesnard told the committee the bill responds to a local situation in Maricopa County where a developer pursued a rezoning just after an election but before newly elected supervisors took office. Under SB 13‑17, any rezoning action taken by a county board after an election and before newly elected supervisors assume office would not become effective for 90 days after the incoming supervisors take office. The bill also clarifies the vote threshold in cases where conflicts of interest reduce the number of supervisors eligible to vote, counting required votes as a majority of the full membership rather than a reduced quorum.

Supporters described the change as a narrow, democratic pause that gives newly elected boards time to review controversial rezoning decisions without preventing counties from taking emergency or routine action. Several members said the delay is unlikely to block legitimate urgent rezonings because zoning typically requires a longer process. Opponents argued the bill could disenfranchise outgoing board members and urged carve-outs for unanimous or urgent decisions.

The committee recorded a do-pass recommendation by a vote of 4 ayes and 3 nays. During floor consideration members signaled interest in refining carve-outs for truly urgent or unanimous actions.

","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","02/12/2025 - Senate Government","oneSentenceSummary","The Senate Committee on Government recommended passage of SB 13‑17, a bill that would delay the effective date of county rezoning actions for 90 days when a majority of supervisors have turned over following an election.","taxTitle","2025 Legislature Arizona, Arizona","taxId",78572,"location","Arizona","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6331860,"Senate committee advances measure to require citizen-only state census and set up $5 million annual fund",205,1459000,1664270,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2309525-d48c50d7e31781ecc20963bb7e620f8b&start=1459&end=1664","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2309525-d48c50d7e31781ecc20963bb7e620f8b/thumbnail_1459000.jpg","/articles/6331860/Arizona/Senate-committee-advances-measure-to-require-citizen-only-state-census-and-set-up-5-million-annual-fund","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6331860-8837f24491d0dc27360547b063be1653/orig.mp4?Expires=1776546785&Signature=JPUdNDUe9FIXWbSdBNULqIXKTK2g6lkT0YEp4v4Y-b6mXaBg109U3c9pLd8yGyDl1Kmi5~JG~0w89vwef-xGS6wHBiyCUGZLldmhyrp4TGdDRGb2~1ReBCxx8AjQYUV7a2~SjYjc5ekX8CrMNnQcPSTcK0jzalm-3a7760PRKCjexfaqSJLaA4oXxluMELJnJXxq6cBJmoqxh7krkVWwXbs1pXM41Ay1BiukgoYLnybPmPjRcs10YFlUUjmhQbIzjTNM-kGLMnwfJJp~DVY9V9dyU69m~xII8C8K1n8YKu~NxZFc5JsqkRnPOE5zVmHWOLY7OD-v1fsajU4uN5YWZA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Senate lawmakers on Tuesday voted to give Senate Concurrent Resolution 10-22 a do-pass recommendation after adopting a technical amendment, moving the constitutional-style measure closer to a public vote.

SCR 10-22 would require Arizona’s Independent Redistricting Commission to conduct a decennial state census that tabulates the number of U.S. citizens in each legislative district and to use those citizen-only counts, rather than total population, when drawing legislative districts. The measure creates a state census fund and transfers $5,000,000 per fiscal year from the Citizens Clean Elections Fund into that newly created account; money in the state census fund would be continuously appropriated and administered by the IRC or another body designated by the Legislature.

Supporters framed the proposal as a way to ensure that representation at the statehouse reflects “lawful, legal citizens” rather than all residents. A staff summary also said the commission may conduct the state census consistent with U.S. Census Bureau procedures except where federal practices conflict with the measure’s requirements. The resolution would permit any member of the Legislature to initiate enforcement actions if the IRC failed to follow the specified census procedures.

Opponents questioned the need for a duplicative statewide count, the cost to Arizona and legal risk. Committee testimony cited a fiscal estimate prepared on a related proposal that projected a startup cost as low as $25 million and ongoing extrapolated costs up to about $158 million based on prior special census efforts in Arizona. Members also warned that a separate state census could reduce participation in the federal census and jeopardize federal representation and funding.

Public commenters who spoke opposed the measure as duplicative and risky. A testifier who identified herself as Deborah Howard urged continued reliance on the U.S. Census Bureau, calling it the “gold standard” and noting past litigation defending census procedures.

After debate, the committee adopted a seven-page amendment described as technical and then moved the amended resolution. The committee recorded a do-pass-as-amended recommendation by a vote of 4 ayes and 3 nays; the measure, as an SCR, would proceed to the ballot if enacted.

What happens next: Because the measure is an SCR, committee passage advances it toward a floor vote and, if enacted, to the ballot for voter approval. The committee did not adopt a fiscal note during the hearing; multiple members and speakers requested clearer costing and implementation details before later stages.

","Senate lawmakers voted to advance SCR 10‑22, a measure that would require the Independent Redistricting Commission to use citizen-only counts for redistricting and create a state census fund funded by a $5 million annual transfer from the Citizens Clean Elections Fund.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6331849,"Committee backs transfer of state broadband office to Department of Administration amid split testimony",1577,4801000,6378000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2309525-d48c50d7e31781ecc20963bb7e620f8b&start=4801&end=6378","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2309525-d48c50d7e31781ecc20963bb7e620f8b/thumbnail_4801000.jpg","/articles/6331849/Arizona/Committee-backs-transfer-of-state-broadband-office-to-Department-of-Administration-amid-split-testimony","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6331849-f7a43bfa5c0d0aad789555e45968ca8b/orig.mp4?Expires=1776546785&Signature=hX~z7~CO2rZUopsMD250Htly4P91jXxBd2c5gGmyWaaA6wN~8L2BYFNg9PPgutsqkY3nqbD5QauHht0sWj4pUCANIugg0W3qHjrdojq4zc3S18bmttb0N5QmyyJJRyywPEQ0ilr6UXNvkTkSurR2Cx-RZEMv9boHr6GBKnf~yrDyTWzy2X9c8ZswOFDvu0EvzpkbY5ie3Od3CCu4fSNYGiqNwI74U-L4CG1u4cO8yGJhT096YDHwT5k0wXTzYcZM5ERcJ1z4e74k22lzSxHXn85Ei6mmQFstcGka9-Mov3TRkhYQndVf6DPJKON68DUeiJ3KTMbJloRKRqraqXwKhA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Senate Bill 13‑22, which would transfer the State Broadband Office from the Arizona Commerce Authority (ACA) to the Arizona Department of Administration (ADOA), received a do‑pass recommendation from the Senate Committee on Government after a contested hearing.

Sponsor Senator Rogers invited Isaac Blake, a Payson resident with public‑safety and technology experience, to explain why he supports shifting oversight. Blake argued that broadband is critical infrastructure—like roads and 9‑1‑1—and that placing the office inside ADOA would improve coordination across transportation, public safety and other agencies and help ensure that broadband deployment prioritizes public‑safety outcomes (for example, reliable emergency calls in dead‑zone areas).

The Arizona Commerce Authority described its current role and work on multiple programs in testimony and registered neutrality, warning that transferring the office at this implementation stage could disrupt ongoing grant selection and roll‑out. ACA staff said the office has helped deploy projects under prior state grants and is currently administering federal broadband funds and competitive subgrants.

Labor representatives (Communication Workers of America) and other witnesses urged caution, arguing the federal Broadband Equity, Access and Deployment (BEAD) funds are now being allocated and that moving the function could jeopardize momentum, vendor relationships and timely disbursement. Supporters countered that centralized oversight at ADOA would reduce duplication and coordinate public‑safety priorities during rollout.

After debate, the committee returned SB 13‑22 a do‑pass recommendation by a vote of 4 ayes and 3 nays. Members divided over timing: some said the move would improve cross‑agency coordination now, while others said the current ACA‑led rollout should complete before a transfer.

","Senate Bill 13‑22 would move the State Broadband Office from the Arizona Commerce Authority to the Arizona Department of Administration to centralize infrastructure, 9‑1‑1 and public‑safety coordination. Supporters, including a rural first‑responder, said the ADOA would better integrate broadband with emergency communications; the Commerce",{"_33":101,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":102,"_41":103,"_43":104,"_45":105,"_47":106,"_49":107,"_51":108,"_53":109,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":110,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":111,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6331854,"Committee approves bill to require clearer HOA violation notices and allow electronic homeowner responses",475,4313000,4788000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2309525-d48c50d7e31781ecc20963bb7e620f8b&start=4313&end=4788","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2309525-d48c50d7e31781ecc20963bb7e620f8b/thumbnail_4313000.jpg","/articles/6331854/Arizona/Committee-approves-bill-to-require-clearer-HOA-violation-notices-and-allow-electronic-homeowner-responses","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6331854-a4e24af3d8a8c4c760c33a73d00696ad/orig.mp4?Expires=1776546785&Signature=gkk5O0g-DsAWTwIxvQqJ98ReZpbT1zggZl-~xROP-12ZG61M2iEjkM9Euye84RUr5L8F6v~L8737JYTqNmvNujcbUrz8KbqPVuWHAXnxZONy2eBkH6JVY0UhUCY2Xp21dwlWzlB7BWD~omsGoZcRvR64KCXMEoYfGmEf4c5LXA9NJmKVsnTzNnDA~e7vtf1PT7BObA1Q6MnNJbQvPOWBVGbqfcMggjWv6KNhqmk4r8LB9QmlL73ozTr74i2osqagnS28dO-Gi4GYeHb~bsldcm5c7j3KjPjOKgAfnQOmmFrcaFAhlBliCUsGAkNe6yZ979VZwlur4Ghhs7SJgg09ew__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Senate Bill 13‑37, which would tighten procedural requirements for homeowners association violation notices and allow members to respond electronically, received a unanimous do‑pass recommendation from the Senate Committee on Government.

Under current practice, witnesses and homeowner advocates testified, associations sometimes notify owners without full written detail and owners face a burdensome, paper‑based process to contest violations. SB 13‑37 requires an initial written notice of violation to include the alleged violation, the date of the observation, how the member may contest the notice and, upon request, the name of the person who observed the alleged violation. The bill also specifies that written responses from a member may be submitted electronically.

Sponsor Senator Kavanaugh said the change provides due‑process transparency for homeowners and eases administrative burdens by permitting electronic submissions. Committee testimony included homeowners who said they were forced to use certified mail and other onerous steps to preserve appeal rights; Dennis Legere of the Arizona Homeowners Coalition described the change as a way to protect constitutional expression while urging broader enforcement accountability.

The committee adopted a five‑page Kavanaugh amendment that removed the requirement to include the observer’s name in the initial notice while preserving a right to receive the observer’s name upon request. The amendment and bill passed the committee by a recorded vote of 7 ayes, 0 noes.

","Senate Bill 13‑37, sponsored by Senator Kavanaugh, would require homeowners associations to include specified information in notices of violation, permit electronic responses and allow members to petition for an administrative hearing. The committee adopted a five‑page amendment and gave the bill a unanimous do‑pass recommendation.",{"_33":113,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":114,"_41":115,"_43":116,"_45":117,"_47":118,"_49":119,"_51":120,"_53":121,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":122,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":123,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6331856,"Panel approves bill clarifying HOA rules on political flags and signs, allowing names not on ballot",1783,2410000,4193000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2309525-d48c50d7e31781ecc20963bb7e620f8b&start=2410&end=4193","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2309525-d48c50d7e31781ecc20963bb7e620f8b/thumbnail_2410000.jpg","/articles/6331856/Arizona/Panel-approves-bill-clarifying-HOA-rules-on-political-flags-and-signs-allowing-names-not-on-ballot","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6331856-9cc58e7f51b2cbada5ac00eccc70c17b/orig.mp4?Expires=1776546785&Signature=oI~TIdK1wS6v1E5rlBTE8L03zTkA7wJFqgRJCIRWKbslBr9QQ0t35iDnYuhOJvF1m-SrcXRPMkE1EOz4WyTwM2TSRsIi7eilU8N7ODZgZdCOR7Y3pRz6YAiHGy3bVA5E~Tt5ocIgqIiZKIy3YG8hEO3h8YlDgBxzWv73Xv8hE5y7wK4BmOhLIwaE5yweeOV4IAPcJK9phgVSurVexNf8d2DoABjkO9t0wiYNMhMaoLEntsVWia10Dmv49st6WWVCYU5~PSJNV3IFfsfqJv6BbLHPVoBfdTOeArZDotQwx~1JtD3AW8~OAsjbdIAODc2MxxYKR1dbEnqj1XMggQorsQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Senate Committee on Government voted to advance Senate Bill 13‑78, a measure that clarifies the statutory definition of a political sign to include flag‑style displays and to specify that a political sign for a candidate may refer to a named person regardless of whether that person appears on the next ballot (with one statutory exception for primary candidates who do not advance).

Sponsor Senator Mesnard said the change grew from constituent complaints and municipal enforcement actions in which homeowners were fined for nontraditional or \"wavy\" displays and for putting names on signs when the named person was not a ballot candidate. Mesnard said the bill is narrowly tailored to address the enforcement problem without changing timing, size limits or other existing restrictions on political signs.

Testimony included Dennis Legere of the Arizona Homeowners Coalition, who framed the issue as a free‑speech concern and asked the Legislature to protect homeowners’ ability to display political messages. Jason Bridal of the Arizona Association of Community Managers urged caution, warning that broadening the definition could empower nefarious actors to post offensive or inflammatory displays and suggested a mechanism to tie named persons to declared candidacies. The sponsor replied that the statute already uses the standard \"attempts to influence the outcome of an election,\" and the purpose of the bill was to prevent uneven enforcement where residents were fined for putting a name on a display.

After discussion, the committee adopted the measure and recorded a do‑pass recommendation by a vote of 5 ayes and 2 nays. Supporters said the language preserves the standard that the display must attempt to influence an election and does not change time‑in‑placement rules that limit political signs to windows near an election, while opponents warned of unintended consequences and asked for clarifying language.

","Senate Bill 13‑78, which expands the statutory definition of \"political sign\" to include flags and to cover names of individuals who are not on the upcoming ballot, advanced from committee. Sponsor Senator Mesnard said the narrow change responds to HOAs fining residents for draped or flag-like signs such as \"Jesus 2024.\" Testimony","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Senate panel backs bill to pause county rezoning actions when majority of supervisors turn over

Senate committee advances measure to require citizen-only state census and set up $5 million annual fund

Committee backs transfer of state broadband office to Department of Administration amid split testimony

Committee approves bill to require clearer HOA violation notices and allow electronic homeowner responses

Panel approves bill clarifying HOA rules on political flags and signs, allowing names not on ballot