On February 12, 2025, the Oregon State Legislature introduced Senate Bill 98, a legislative proposal aimed at reforming certain aspects of family law and jury service procedures. The bill seeks to address critical issues surrounding child custody determinations and the management of juror responsibilities, reflecting a broader commitment to enhancing the efficiency and fairness of the judicial system.

One of the key provisions of SB 98 focuses on temporary custody orders and parenting time arrangements. The bill stipulates that hearings to contest such orders will be limited to assessing the immediate danger to the child at the time the order was issued. This aims to streamline court proceedings and ensure that decisions are made swiftly in the best interests of the child. Additionally, the bill mandates that if a party fails to appear at a hearing without good cause, the court will vacate the order, reinforcing accountability among parties involved in custody disputes.

Another significant aspect of SB 98 pertains to jury service. The bill amends existing laws to allow jurors to request excusal from service through various means, including telephone and mail, thereby accommodating individuals facing undue hardship. Notably, it includes provisions for automatic excusal for individuals over 70 years of age and for breastfeeding women, recognizing the unique challenges these groups may face. Furthermore, the bill addresses the needs of sole caregivers who cannot afford childcare during court hours, ensuring that the jury pool remains representative while also considering individual circumstances.

The introduction of SB 98 has sparked discussions among lawmakers and legal experts regarding its potential implications. Proponents argue that the bill will lead to more efficient court processes and better outcomes for children in custody cases. However, some critics express concerns that limiting the scope of hearings could undermine the rights of parents contesting custody arrangements.

As the bill progresses through the legislative process, its impact on Oregon's judicial landscape remains to be seen. If passed, SB 98 could set a precedent for how family law and jury service are approached in the state, potentially influencing similar reforms in other jurisdictions. The ongoing debates surrounding the bill highlight the delicate balance between expediting judicial processes and safeguarding the rights of individuals involved in legal disputes.