[{"_1":2,"_124":-5,"_125":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,100,112],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6329575,"mediaKeyId","2315960-e1e67b8e17dcda93439398472a0856ec","parentId",2315960,"title","Developers present amended Bridal Street redevelopment agreement; council hears schedule and financing changes","audioSeconds",710,"startMs",696000,"endMs",1406000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2315960-e1e67b8e17dcda93439398472a0856ec&start=696&end=1406","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2315960-e1e67b8e17dcda93439398472a0856ec/thumbnail_696000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6329575/Tennessee/Developers-present-amended-Bridal-Street-redevelopment-agreement-council-hears-schedule-and-financing-changes","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6329575-ce91e61e03fc6df9c59830e8b0c14e8a/orig.mp4?Expires=1775857045&Signature=dQ20nscH9cp~2eCMFyDvbUVzXc2QEUsdn-PPT5aDwQ6~gCbb-GGLs5xCYJjWuISzr~aSLA0VUFvgIeHN12MacSNAoCp5tJuXs-BWhzcUNJ76~4-eM55JpoWNNO3Hrr7Zybi0PK3qmmYe-2ZN6GFykjD0mnpvor6TU8H9OlTq9ayrXgaMt9RJvfj2ax1jbqhkAsHIxd8OehO~deFidiET4~SEnpkp9WAeRwPFcUN1jFIt2N8rb3Co3Fb-hekZ2GQUHcOqkBWrob1eBNCfj6QIR2srfLW1u7Rk0SQYWA22~bIHUrsgoH77qB0o9uWd5BtmbzV~wNU7ieaab~~o6PtJUA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","City of Murfreesboro, TN","date","2025-02-13T20:14:46Z","article","Developers and city staff presented amendments to the Bridal Street redevelopment agreement during the Murfreesboro City Council meeting on Feb. 13, describing revised project phasing, financing updates and additional public improvements.

The amended and restated agreement — presented by Matt Taylor of SCC and city staff member Darren (last name not specified) — updates the development timeline, removes the hotel parcel from an immediate purchase while preserving the project's overall purchase price, and adds street and intersection improvements that will be part of the developer's obligations. Taylor said the team selected an equity partner and a general contractor, and that drawings for all buildings except the hotel are about 25% complete.

Staff and the development team said the change separates the hotel parcel from the rest of the project so the hotel's tax-increment financing (TIF) allocation would not be triggered until the hotel parcel is constructed. Taylor said the hotel parcel is being pulled out as a separate element worth about $550,000 of the previously stated roughly $5,000,000 purchase price. He described the hotel site as a two-year option for the city and said the project will still include two parking structures that together will provide up to 115 spaces intended to serve a future hotel.

\"We've continued our negotiations with WGNS. Those are at about the 99 yard line,\" Matt Taylor said, referring to a tenant/site element. On entitlements, Taylor said the plan proposes about 2,310 for-lease units (transcript: \"$2.31 for lease units\" — quoted wording in transcript unclear) and 98 for-sale units, and that the project retains the developer's commitment to a \"hometown heroes\" program offering reduced rent or sales price for police officers, firefighters and teachers.

Council members pressed the developers on who qualifies for the hometown-heroes set-aside. Taylor and staff said the classification is constrained by federal rules cited by the development team; the group said historical practice for that program has been police, firefighters and teachers and that military service members are not included under the federal framework the team relied on. Taylor clarified that 5% of the for-lease units will be held \"in perpetuity\" for the hometown-heroes discount and that for-sale units would be controlled only for the initial sale to the qualifying buyer.

Councilors also asked about pricing and the project's affordability. Taylor said the team has not set final sale prices and that the market is producing a range of buyer types; he said the developer will attempt to \"make them as affordable as we can so they'll sell as fast as they can.\" On schedule, Taylor said work on the WGNS building is expected to start in September, with the larger portion of the project starting in April 2026 and an estimated 18 months of construction for the main portion.

Darren outlined the approval path the city will follow: the amended development and purchase-and-sale agreements will return to the council for approval (proposed Feb. 27 or March 6), the Industrial Development Board will review the economic impact plan and funding agreement, and a subsequent council meeting would adopt the IDB-approved economic impact and funding agreement. Darren said the project must also go through county review processes and the IDB.

Council members asked for a clear timeline and communication memo to stakeholders once the city finalizes the schedule and exhibits that will accompany the revised development agreement.

The presentation included a detailed description of additional public roadway work the developer would provide, including turn lanes on Broad Street and restripping/repaving along South Church Street. The development team also said the TIF term and cap on dollars are unchanged from prior approvals; the amendment primarily adjusts when certain buildings' revenues and obligations begin flowing under the TIF structure.

No formal council vote was taken on the amended agreement at this meeting; staff said the final documents and action items would return for council approval on the dates above.

The council asked city staff to schedule the finalized development agreement and related documents for a future meeting and requested a stakeholder communications plan and timeline in advance of that consideration.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","City Council Workshop - February 13, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","Developers and city staff presented amendments to the Bridal Street redevelopment agreement during the Murfreesboro City Council meeting on Feb. 13, describing revised project phasing, financing updates and added public improvements.","taxTitle","City Council Meetings, Murfreesboro City, Rutherford County, Tennessee","taxId",69344,"location","Tennessee","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6329556,"Council approves multiple rezoning ordinances, ballfield lighting contract and a CIP reallocation for storm-pipe repairs",281,355000,636000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2315960-e1e67b8e17dcda93439398472a0856ec&start=355&end=636","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2315960-e1e67b8e17dcda93439398472a0856ec/thumbnail_355000.jpg","/articles/6329556/Tennessee/Council-approves-multiple-rezoning-ordinances-ballfield-lighting-contract-and-a-CIP-reallocation-for-storm-pipe-repairs","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6329556-f620da5f888316ef658924c56267b501/orig.mp4?Expires=1775857045&Signature=lsAprud26KH4rcWGHtYCFYQtqwy8TSkHGqHkBeqz~o7XGKP53A-THM4hMalO3Ha51TntYjBWTbulNvRQZ8TW2p8ZOsaUJhAesZFVeDRGl7DO-Fetq6B3ex2um4e-Kn2XtTX5IGhJaHCmauw1EFGBugjMoCNsUx7VVGenpwMQvCL5P1tUXTGJu4N7WXLqqm1yyk7t2Y1MwYD1Qjv6ctbl8CxCoZiWQ~SepqoiDzXLk-~sgFna-eea2BzF4uD4qXPRBZsWkxn71BezB9iZbm6GWN8s8k5OtnOHIreQv1v5Ku0csA112tle48-BdZJXZUOxJoybTzlwqTxNUjxa2tuT~w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Murfreesboro City Council recorded several roll-call votes on Feb. 13, approving multiple zoning ordinances on second and final reading, awarding a lighting contract for Oak Fork Park ball fields and approving a capital improvement reallocation for a failed drainage pipe.

Rezoning ordinances: The council carried second and final readings for multiple ordinances to amend planned development (PCD/PRD) and other zoning designations for properties along North Rutherford Boulevard, East Castle Street, Longvilles Road and Old Las Casas Road. The meeting transcript records unanimous roll-call votes of \"Aye\" for each ordinance with the following council members recorded during roll calls: Gail Harris, Vice Mayor Schacklett, Mr. Wade, Mr. Wright and Mayor Mary McFarland. The ordinance identifiers in the transcript were read as: \"25 OZ 04\" (North Rutherford Boulevard), \"25 Z 05\" (East Castle Street), \"25 0002\" (Longvilles Road PRD amendment) and \"25 0 z 03\" (Old Las Casas Road). The transcript did not include additional staff summaries or debate on the rezoning items at the time of the votes.

Old Fork/Oak Fork Park ballfield lighting: City staff presented an agreement with Musco Lighting and requested a CIP funds reallocation for ball field lighting renovations at Oak Fork Park (called \"Old Fort Ballfield\" in the agenda). Staff described replacing wood poles installed in the 1970s with six galvanized poles on concrete bases, a new control cabinet and Musco-supplied equipment under a Sourcewell contract. The transcript records the project cost of $329,852 and states it is funded by the 2025 CIP and general fund budget, \"including a reallocation of $602,793 from the Veterans Park 2025 and the ball field ... Park expansion CIP budgets\" (staff wording in transcript unclear). The council moved, seconded and approved the item by roll call; the transcript records all council members voting \"Aye.\" Russell presented the item and answered council questions.

Kingdom Ridge pipe replacement CIP reallocation: Chris (city engineering) reported on a failed 2004 60-inch plastic drainage pipe at the rear of properties on Pillar Drive in the Kingdom Ridge subdivision. Staff identified three critical failure areas and proposed replacing the plastic pipe with concrete pipe, with the street department performing installation, and purchasing pipe, junction boxes and bedding stone through annual city contracts. The council approved a reallocation of $250,000 for the project; the motion was moved, seconded and approved by roll call with all council members recorded \"Aye.\" Chris said the street department would install the pipe to help manage and reduce costs.

Votes at a glance (transcript-recorded action items):
- Ordinance 25 OZ 04 (PCD zoning amendment, North Rutherford Boulevard) — second/final reading — Outcome: Approved (roll-call, unanimous \"Aye\").
- Ordinance 25 Z 05 (Rezoning, East Castle Street) — second/final reading — Outcome: Approved (roll-call, unanimous \"Aye\").
- Ordinance 25 0002 (PRD amendment, Longvilles Road) — second/final reading — Outcome: Approved (roll-call, unanimous \"Aye\").
- Ordinance 25 0 Z 03 (Rezoning, Old Las Casas Road) — second/final reading — Outcome: Approved (roll-call, unanimous \"Aye\").
- Musco Lighting agreement for Oak Fork Park ball field lighting — Motion: approve agreement and CIP reallocation (project cost stated as $329,852; reallocation language referenced $602,793) — Outcome: Approved (roll-call, unanimous \"Aye\").
- CIP reallocation $250,000 for failed drainage pipe in Kingdom Ridge subdivision (replace 60-inch plastic pipe with concrete) — Outcome: Approved (roll-call, unanimous \"Aye\").

The transcript contains minor inconsistencies in ordinance numbering and some project amounts; staff and the clerk will file the official ordinance texts and contract documents in the public record with precise ordinance numbers, contract identifiers and budget line items.","On second and final readings the council adopted several rezoning ordinances, approved a Musco Lighting agreement for ballfield lighting at Oak Fork Park, and reallocated $250,000 in CIP funds for a failed drainage pipe in Kingdom Ridge subdivision.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6329561,"Council discusses draft MTSU service-fee, solid-waste pickup schedule change and a study into annexing Middle Point Landfill",496,4304000,4800000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2315960-e1e67b8e17dcda93439398472a0856ec&start=4304&end=4800","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2315960-e1e67b8e17dcda93439398472a0856ec/thumbnail_4304000.jpg","/articles/6329561/Tennessee/Council-discusses-draft-MTSU-service-fee-solid-waste-pickup-schedule-change-and-a-study-into-annexing-Middle-Point-Landfill","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6329561-11331ae6277c24812148fe83dc1d12bf/orig.mp4?Expires=1775857045&Signature=jAcPTfiVVuOKCQFRl46N4m1oDiQ08cTtB3XTW37RwLWAD2jvtjYjrc4w350EdO0FCx5SRn5YX8V9OD4bqaTtmB2AvmroF5RYVbjTSYdT-0wcuOW28zdagTy6EUrikFYd1qknOsa-XHBgY1jfYnRWRLLtNYlMLVNxdq9TsAqKTCPtx8UEN7OFz5pedgHTedFOf3NvpIjnS2Hl6aTxgyFqM~THFSJJHwXexJFIZWOI62p0IjV6ZnB3RIYiR4FJjd0GQ~xV3qthJsEZ-77EAA10EGfKWddQEmfm4-4-4rl2oHKQARWe8n-wjLXhe3h7nBFTDxSGbDx365IhDL9if-T5ZQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","City staff updated the council on several city-service items on Feb. 13: a draft service-fee agreement with Middle Tennessee State University for off-campus residential properties, a proposed change to the municipal solid-waste pickup schedule and a proposed staff study into annexing Middle Point Landfill.

Darren presented a draft five-year service-fee agreement covering 48 properties MTSU owns around campus that are leased for residential use. Using an impact study from 2022 and internal calculations, staff said the draft fee would be $848 per property per year; the fee would be payable annually and would not be charged for properties that were vacant or converted to nonresidential institutional uses. The city would recalculate the fee within 180 days before the end of the five-year term to set a new rate for a subsequent term. Darren said the draft agreement assigns the fees to public services including public safety, parks and recreation, streets and solid waste. No council action was requested at the meeting; staff said the draft was for review and further negotiation.

On solid waste, Russell (solid-waste manager, last name not specified) told the council the department proposes changing the pickup schedule to Monday–Thursday (from the current Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday pattern that leaves Wednesday for maintenance) and to reassign some routes so that about 11,500 residents would have a revised pickup day. Staff said residents would continue to receive weekly collection; the change principally affects which weekday their service occurs. Russell told the council crews would use the former Friday maintenance day for operational needs and washing. Staff described a sticker/tag and mail/website communications campaign and said crews would likely do courtesy pick-ups early in implementation for missed collections.

Separately, Mayor Mary McFarland asked planning and legal staff to study and return with a proposal for annexing the Middle Point Landfill. The mayor said a 30-year leachate agreement (referenced in the meeting) included a clause in which the landfill operator (formerly BFI; later Republic) agreed not to contest annexation requests. She said annexation could allow the city to collect property taxes on the landfill and urged staff to prepare a planning commission submittal and a council report. Council did not take a formal vote on annexation during the meeting but the mayor asked staff to \"start that process,\" and staff agreed to begin work.

Council members praised staff work on the MTSU negotiations and asked for continued communication about the solid-waste schedule changes so residents know their new collection days. Staff said it would prepare materials for council and public distribution and asked for time to finalize details on the MTSU fee proposal before returning with an agreement for council consideration.","Staff briefed the council on a draft five-year service-fee agreement with MTSU for 48 residential properties, a proposed shift to four-day solid-waste pickup affecting ~11,500 residents, and the mayor asked planning and legal to study annexation of the Middle Point Landfill.",{"_33":101,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":102,"_41":103,"_43":104,"_45":105,"_47":106,"_49":107,"_51":108,"_53":109,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":110,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":111,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6329566,"Airport officials outline runway, fuel and tower plans as operations and training shift",750,3450000,4200000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2315960-e1e67b8e17dcda93439398472a0856ec&start=3450&end=4200","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2315960-e1e67b8e17dcda93439398472a0856ec/thumbnail_3450000.jpg","/articles/6329566/Tennessee/Airport-officials-outline-runway-fuel-and-tower-plans-as-operations-and-training-shift","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6329566-2e66dab210c16a1591461afcae3744ad/orig.mp4?Expires=1775857045&Signature=XgJEoS97ASQdEWtQ6KOgl-esmgWvLoLLMLCWGI9c83KTLu~I6ivutDCiHvL0H4in9MEG80hahogaDwRRp19fG9zbTbRcD4idL89QTBtdrCairsKUePhUqf66OpriDSpgRCRJs-bn2Jyf1efzlZpOXyyVTmlgYoF00SJ-OPrNIw2UEmw-i3MbwivdyX~rWRmP8HogyygAGXXVsGZSN~M0VbBr1~Zomp8CUByAXnbtI0jtgIXNJ4inruGQeE0uuGmuUgtYPHKPrq49eSP7pl9gNkRZKfUo2WOPd09g~wZ0PVk4ylqgTJIr5q881bVSUD8w6nZarNjRf1DNYGZv0BbQ1g__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Airport staff updated the City Council on Feb. 13 about recent and planned projects at Murfreesboro Municipal Airport, including fuel-farm upgrades, runway work, property acquisitions tied to runway protection zones, and a planned study for a federal contract control tower.

Chad Gherke, airport director, told the council the airport recently expanded fuel capacity (changes from 12,000 gallons of Avgas to additional Jet A capacity and environmental containment upgrades) and completed runway threshold relocation and pavement repairs. He said the airport is preparing for the future 0‑lead Avgas specification and that some additional pavement work near the T-hangars remains under design.

Gherke reported the airport recorded about 91,000 operations in the latest count and described a drop in flight-training operations (primarily University/MTSU activity) of roughly 10,000 operations as training moved partially to nearby airports. \"We're in that 90,000 range of operations, which is a busy general aviation airport,\" he said, noting operations remain strong even as training patterns shift. The airport's Vertower monitoring shows a reduction in operations during key hours compared with 2021, which staff said correlates with fewer community complaints.

Gherke described efforts to clear approaches for Runway 36, including negotiations to acquire or otherwise protect properties in runway protection zones; he said six of eight affected properties have already been acquired and that the city has requested state financial assistance for additional purchases. He said Barge Design Services is designing plans to meet FAA standards for approach protection.

The airport is also studying sites for a federal contract tower; three candidate sites are under review and the FAA will study tower feasibility. Gherke said the airport is planning taxiway and hangar-area development (the \"Foxtrot\" area) to support charter services, hangar demand and aviation jobs, and he tied that economic focus to MTSU's phased relocation of some training operations to other airports.

Council members asked about daily operations and comparisons with similarly sized airports; staff said Murfreesboro's operations are comparable to some mid-sized general aviation airports and highlighted the need for continued grant advocacy at state and federal levels because general aviation funding has tightened.

Gherke asked the council to support continued financial planning and grant-seeking to sustain airport maintenance, development and prospective tower and hangar projects.","Airport staff reported runway and fuel-farm upgrades, plans to pursue a federal contract tower and a multi-phase transition as MTSU relocates some flight training; staff said operations are near 91,000 annually and that flight-training operations have declined while overall operations have remained busy.",{"_33":113,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":114,"_41":115,"_43":116,"_45":117,"_47":118,"_49":119,"_51":120,"_53":121,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":122,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":123,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6329571,"Council votes to pause development across Cherry Lane corridor for up to nine months pending master plan study",932,2104000,3036000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2315960-e1e67b8e17dcda93439398472a0856ec&start=2104&end=3036","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2315960-e1e67b8e17dcda93439398472a0856ec/thumbnail_2104000.jpg","/articles/6329571/Tennessee/Council-votes-to-pause-development-across-Cherry-Lane-corridor-for-up-to-nine-months-pending-master-plan-study","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6329571-2b536007763c650ee7958697dab8fd81/orig.mp4?Expires=1775857045&Signature=nkw~7Z1zlGmyhjmWQt87IF8qZHBpSyJ4nClsZUqAW8gcGGb8onfmbyyLO10MgxMnKyz-hEa25EBGXsumfd5HP9-73XLNGt-pPJl6vXQJ02G4da148I1~oCWfO7PBpE~DqquE2lzJ6A1p8MZfdGM6O2jwO1lYJVprZLrYM~7oDP~1~SHGg8AW1tmjRVglne3WRtUt8mRZPCCxbtKY1kv3PsJiC-cyO3MWExGXztfamD-n4ZkBJzJplwVWxP5eFX8FwAa-L6-3oFd4MdLP-q88WyD-fKonF0srmDsEiumPK6f0z6sirmhXTT2~6UnSr~ziUc4XExB1y2OEgKL6Lk14nw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Murfreesboro City Council voted on Feb. 13 to pause development approvals across a broad corridor around Cherry Lane and the I-24 interchange while the city pursues a comprehensive master plan to coordinate transportation, utilities and floodplain constraints.

Darren (city staff development lead) and planning staff told the council the pause responds to uncertainty created by the Tennessee Department of Transportation's \"choice lane\" project for I-24 and by other physical constraints including CSX railroad alignment, Overall Creek, West Fork Stones River and extensive 100-year floodplain in the corridor. Staff said piecemeal permitting could leave the city with a mismatched road and utility network if the interchange concept changes.

\"We just feel like this is a 50-year decision,\" Darren said, urging a city-led, macro-scale master plan rather than a series of micro-scale approvals. He added the corridor contains large undeveloped tracts that could produce thousands of units under current zoning and that an interchange change would affect land use appropriateness.

Councilmember Jim (surname not specified in transcript) and other council members described recent discussions with TDOT and told the council they had been warned that some intersection designs could be inadequate decades out without major additional roadwork. The council discussed a limited exception process: staff said areas with existing sewer and unaffected transportation access (for example, a portion of the Waldron property highlighted in staff slides) could proceed and would be brought forward individually.

Councilmember (name recorded as) made a motion to suspend development approvals for the corridor for a six- to nine-month period; the motion was seconded and passed on a roll-call vote with all council members recorded as \"Aye.\" During the vote Mayor Mary McFarland asked staff to prepare a firm timeline for communications to the development community and stakeholders.

Staff said it expects to bring a consultant proposal within weeks and that a formal master plan could take approximately six to nine months to complete once it begins; staff later said the calendar could stretch to about nine months by the time the city issues and reviews the consultant work. Several council members emphasized the need for a clear public communications plan so property owners and developers know the scope and length of the pause.

The council's motion creates a temporary moratorium on approval activity in the study area while staff and an outside consultant team evaluate alternative interchange and circulation scenarios, utility needs and floodplain constraints. Staff emphasized that certain parcels with established access and sewer could still be considered on a case-by-case basis.

Darren told councilors he will prepare a communications memo and a timeline for the council to review before staff begins widespread outreach to the development community.

The motion passed on a roll call recorded in the meeting transcript with the following recorded votes: Gail Harris — Yes; Vice Mayor Schacklett — Yes; Mr. Wade — Aye; Mr. Wright — Aye; Mayor Mary McFarland — Aye.","The Murfreesboro City Council voted unanimously Feb. 13 to suspend development approvals in a broad Cherry Lane/I-24 corridor area for roughly six to nine months while staff advances a master plan examining transportation, utilities and floodplain constraints.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Developers present amended Bridal Street redevelopment agreement; council hears schedule and financing changes

Council approves multiple rezoning ordinances, ballfield lighting contract and a CIP reallocation for storm-pipe repairs

Council discusses draft MTSU service-fee, solid-waste pickup schedule change and a study into annexing Middle Point Landfill

Airport officials outline runway, fuel and tower plans as operations and training shift

Council votes to pause development across Cherry Lane corridor for up to nine months pending master plan study