[{"_1":2,"_122":-5,"_123":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,86,98,110],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6338552,"mediaKeyId","2269831-38d45925f536e2576b522c8acd96d923","parentId",2269831,"title","Votes at a glance: warrants, contracts, housing policy, town repayment and fuel revolver cap approved","audioSeconds",6254,"startMs",108000,"endMs",6362000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2269831-38d45925f536e2576b522c8acd96d923&start=108&end=6362","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2269831-38d45925f536e2576b522c8acd96d923/thumbnail_108000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6338552/Nantucket-County/Massachusetts/Votes-at-a-glance-warrants-contracts-housing-policy-town-repayment-and-fuel-revolver-cap-approved","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6338552-3f69a30f3e0ce2b11ba09e46dedb4f06/orig.mp4?Expires=1776410604&Signature=ikxWUi7Dgqw81~2TtQR-OfuG8GOaM2~ZaqQmNf3MaAa3~y0OklNHuX43zLx3OZkxdo9RPa5d0E-hoTrNYW2SrqdRQPhyPPHCdvsdq724WNJ-Gd8jsEuxaSnWYwXk-IPyP2FBUgZ5LmBqOjZRy2wBaBLBXSLqCyOp15Xjqos9KJA9RL~-1D3XjyUotPWWd4GoyWrFhQ7m2ogGrTo1sX9pWR5stuTD64e6N67VX-sct5RdECPUEKqUrmAbtq~J~6ZFrT5W4WfGPOXJ6iyB2ANORsMadV6RBQCsbBV48x7lUTJwxHsVuktO7ZLRVxu08wCACpM08x4MGX7uURB1eTVNRQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Town-County of Nantucket, MA","date","2025-02-12T09:07:19.12Z","article","The Nantucket Memorial Airport Commission recorded the following formal actions at its Feb. 11 meeting. Each motion was moved, seconded and confirmed by roll call as noted.

Warrants (Jan. 8 and Jan. 22): The commission moved to ratify warrants for Jan. 8 and Jan. 22. Roll‑call votes recorded Ms. Hoffman (Aye), Ms. Garen (Aye), Sam Marks (Aye) and the chair (Aye). Outcome: adopted by unanimous consent.

Contracts and contract amendments: The commission approved a set of contracts and change orders (see separate coverage) that included Hortonville Consulting ($53,410), Pearl Construction change order No. 4 ($19,616.55), a credit/extension with Industrial Protection Systems ($1,469.25 credit and calendar extension), an Oshkosh change order ($26,873) and a McFarland Johnson task order for ramp lighting ($253,700). Recorded roll call included Miss Topham (Aye), Ms. Garen (Aye), Mr. Marks (Aye) and the chair (Aye). Outcome: approved.

Warren Smith deployment agreement (new airport manager): The commission voted to execute a deployment agreement for Warren Smith for the new airport manager position. The roll call recorded Miss Topham (Aye), Miss Mascaren (Aye), Mr. Marks (Aye) and a recorded \"Sherry\" vote (Aye). Outcome: agreement authorized.

Employee housing policy (dormitory manager apartment use): The commission approved a housing selection policy to make the one‑bedroom dorm manager apartment available for full‑time employee housing with a requirement to follow collective‑bargaining direction when applicable. Roll call: Miss Topham (Aye), Mr. Mascaren (Aye), Mr. Marks (Aye) and chair (Aye). Outcome: adopted.

Repayment and retirement of town debt: The commission authorized repayment to the town general fund for the fiscal year, including the scheduled payment (~$235,000), an additional principal payment (~$188,000) and in‑kind services/materials valued at approximately $21,000. Motion carried by roll call (votes recorded as Miss Cobham Aye; Karen Aye; Sparks recorded; chair Aye). Outcome: approved; staff to arrange department‑to‑department transfers/invoicing for in‑kind materials moving forward.

Fuel revolver cap adjustment: The commission authorized an administrative increase to the fuel revolver cap from $6,000,000 to $8,500,000 to ensure working capital for peak summer fuel purchases. Roll call: Miss Topham (Aye), Miss Cameron (Aye), Mr. Marks (Aye) and chair (Aye). Outcome: approved.

Staff will implement the decisions as directed and report back on procurements, contract paperwork, debt service entries and fuel procurement planning at upcoming meetings.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Nantucket Airport Commission - February 11, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The commission recorded several formal actions Feb. 11: adoption of prior minutes/warrants, approval of the listed contracts, execution of a deployment agreement for a new airport manager, approval of an employee housing policy, authorization to repay town debts, and an increase to the fuel revolver cap.","taxTitle","Nantucket County, Massachusetts","taxId",61456,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":79,"_47":80,"_49":81,"_51":82,"_53":83,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":84,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":85,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6338557,"Consultants present terminal HVAC and geothermal options; treating or relocating geothermal wells discussed as PFAS remedy",0,5661000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2269831-38d45925f536e2576b522c8acd96d923&start=5661&end=5661","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2269831-38d45925f536e2576b522c8acd96d923/thumbnail_5661000.jpg","/articles/6338557/Nantucket-County/Massachusetts/Consultants-present-terminal-HVAC-and-geothermal-options-treating-or-relocating-geothermal-wells-discussed-as-PFAS-remedy","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6338557-df653417b8f6698e29a88fd5e04f4b13/orig.mp4?Expires=1776410604&Signature=Bzfh8N0B7~RrZiYKEA2rrAvWXnV1z3YUqtv9Vqr-d~2GAxj~-W~EMY9~LYvG61adRsWxPHW9ON6ZQrbbYML3qu5JYgxg7Nz~x0gSzE1Hp1ymOeSFI1coVwN8Dxsgym2nblz~90xXNDsSc91kh2TO31TGwXeahLeKrJhpSHdnwfGzJ7eiVO2bR4bBD2kKJPynqqXAW~9Q1Umbh1fW0eV76Rie75eRKrhnt5vvFdlef~ZX7xb193FP4~7aiWBCQy0QVXIrtyE4MBi-bdCjbS4PBQsMgzG2ibthrfQ6uMEqrKTChU2vDoZAGzO9ITMljibmR0RtMtqDlX9-MjCaKsRxyw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","At the Feb. 11 meeting, consultants presented high‑level options for the terminal heating and cooling system and discussed how those choices intersect with PFAS remediation options.

The staff presentation outlined four broad options: (1) an adiabatic (evaporative) or air‑cooled dry cooler with electric or propane boiler backup that would retain much of the existing equipment; (2) electric air‑source heat pumps for a modern, zoned solution; (3) a closed‑loop geothermal field requiring a new well field and manifold; and (4) retaining the existing open‑loop geothermal well system but adding groundwater treatment to prevent spread of contamination. Consultants provided ballpark capital‑cost guidance for the options and emphasized that retaining and treating the existing open‑loop system — or moving extraction/injection points — could both reduce groundwater migration and produce heat‑exchange benefits for the terminal.

Jim Soukup and consultant Rich Lasdun both stressed that PFAS remedial work in the Phase 3 report will likely require some active groundwater control in the Runway‑15 approach area; that regulatory context strengthens the argument for treating or relocating geothermal wells rather than simply abandoning them. One consultant said a treated, relocated open‑loop system could accelerate contaminant capture and reduce off‑site migration while preserving energy performance benefits for the terminal. Commissioners urged detailed load data, phasing plans and cost estimates to inform a preferred option; consultants agreed to provide those figures and to coordinate geothermal options with the Phase 3 remedial analysis and the terminal optimization schedule.

No formal commission decision was taken at the meeting; staff and consultants will refine load estimates, cost models and integration plans and return at a subsequent meeting.","Consultants walked commissioners through four terminal HVAC options — adiabatic/dry cooler with boiler backup, electric air‑source heat pumps, closed‑loop geothermal, or retain and treat the existing open‑loop geothermal system — and discussed linking geothermal decisions to PFAS groundwater remedies.",{"_33":87,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":88,"_41":89,"_43":90,"_45":91,"_47":92,"_49":93,"_51":94,"_53":95,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":96,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":97,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6338562,"South ramp air‑quality modeling shows net emissions declines; commission narrows sound‑barrier choice to perforated PVC with mineral wool",970,476000,1446000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2269831-38d45925f536e2576b522c8acd96d923&start=476&end=1446","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2269831-38d45925f536e2576b522c8acd96d923/thumbnail_476000.jpg","/articles/6338562/Nantucket-County/Massachusetts/South-ramp-airquality-modeling-shows-net-emissions-declines-commission-narrows-soundbarrier-choice-to-perforated-PVC-with-mineral-wool","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6338562-01fcaf7e6d67df1959fabe0fca9f4ab4/orig.mp4?Expires=1776410604&Signature=Va7VpQvwN01SOb5PpbW0k5xvZG08iZf-90onZvoIWdHvXTrjqzm9gcJnby0aPesLmAP1DklDg8VurffNMM-00CzHtAXTHzLcpP9RjZ4XaQriJEBtWoEAvLeorxIZj3H1JqfsAPAah9jeOdqRZ8KKOBqmGtIk0gf3O-nF~NfD26hknhS-SMx~oTE1781Ok1Jxw7DJOGA3selkcm2P14aN0x-MNHwiWgJ4KYXE3Ccp5fE5AWwhaEWTr4BWiPkke8YcAxC0P0XyTrn62Pc662HpDDIjlRDjW9KD83Lc~3aSjRiHAVQvQSroakgKqzXm425OID2Bd7foBj2IXdvG6gKXVQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Commissioners reviewed an air‑quality technical report and a consultant sound‑barrier study for the south apron expansion at the Feb. 11 meeting. Staff described the air‑quality study as a baseline, worst‑case modeling run that compared pre‑ and post‑expansion conditions using locally recorded meteorology and aircraft activity patterns.

Consultants reported that the model showed reductions in total emissions across modeled criteria pollutants in the scenarios run. The greatest modeled reductions came from decreased taxi time and more efficient aircraft routing to the new apron configurations; receptors near some portions of the extended ramp would see modest increases in worst‑case scenarios, but the magnitude of modeled increases remained far below EPA criteria pollutant thresholds, staff and consultants said.

On noise mitigation, McFarland Johnson and HMMH consultants presented four wall options: perforated PVC with mineral‑wool absorptive fill, fiberglass absorptive panels, precast absorptive concrete, and timber panels. The presenters explained the difference between reflective walls, which bounce sound back to the airfield, and absorptive walls that capture and dissipate sound energy. Consultants said an absorptive wall with a sloped top and side returns would perform better than a simple reflective barrier.

Consultant Rich Lasdun recommended a perforated PVC panel system with mineral‑wool absorption as the preferred solution based on modeled performance, anticipated noise reduction, maintenance considerations and modular construction benefits. Lasdun said manufacturers describe a service life up to 40 years and that some installations exist in comparable northeastern climates; he said the PVC option and fiberglass panels met the minimum 0.9 decibel reduction threshold the team used as a reference.

Commissioners asked about durability in Nantucket’s salt‑spray environment, foundation and attachment options, and whether a sloped 45‑degree top return could be used; the consultant said manufacturers offer those details and that foundation options would include drilled shafts or caissons sized for wind loads. Commissioners requested ballpark cost estimates and said they would like a follow‑up in the March meeting to discuss cost ranges and bid timing. Staff said the team aims to issue bids in March to obtain firm pricing ahead of annual town meeting, noting the tradeoff that state procurement rules typically require contractors to hold prices only for a limited period (approximately three months), which could make early bids stale by the time contracts are executed.

The commission did not take a formal vote on a final wall material at the meeting but directed staff and consultants to return with cost estimates and bid‑ready documents.","Commissioners reviewed a modeling report showing modeled emission reductions from the South Apron expansion under worst‑case activity assumptions, and consultants recommended a perforated PVC absorptive sound wall with mineral‑wool backing as the preferred noise barrier.",{"_33":99,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":100,"_41":101,"_43":102,"_45":103,"_47":104,"_49":105,"_51":106,"_53":107,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":108,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":109,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6338566,"PFAS sampling prompts expanded disposal boundary; several homes offered town water connections",1095,1605000,2700000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2269831-38d45925f536e2576b522c8acd96d923&start=1605&end=2700","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2269831-38d45925f536e2576b522c8acd96d923/thumbnail_1605000.jpg","/articles/6338566/Nantucket-County/Massachusetts/PFAS-sampling-prompts-expanded-disposal-boundary-several-homes-offered-town-water-connections","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6338566-e713dcbc08dafe2373845a1fb77297fb/orig.mp4?Expires=1776410604&Signature=fG5-rWFzztS-EYU5NX5mMb9sfZButFh3~9U46~IlkPfDmoIpHW9~S6qQ5Qb6LHG4w~VWWSWqonIx~JD1ZEN9eeuJRvWS3wZ0fs-HhW3v6TBXurgcfuFaQk52FeQRXe1AX6L4lXbMsVCqOkfPYocreWUnNj5Wc5~e93hwUSGu7kt3ew72KG4zTepUa5fv52W~OOMJYQdn9rLCmYcbUBHw~gJNSCk6-e1OT72JGbCnSDVlA4skD3WprmbM3xY7pLSXiVAC5EaS9oWBgvtKanaC-OpM3bj6y~8LBdhgNIieS6zw~6prLrZ9~7FOJoqX3rmXBFra-kYo8skcHCsH1gVIWA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Nantucket Memorial Airport Commission received an update Feb. 11 on an ongoing PFAS investigation at and west of airport property, including new sampling, expanded disposal‑site boundaries, monitoring‑well installations and a Phase 3 remedial alternatives study the airport expects to file with MassDEP.

Environmental coordinator Cameron Woods told the commission the airport has transitioned ARFF trucks to a fluorine‑free foam system and posted an IFB for converting two trucks that must be sent off island. Woods introduced Jim Soukup, the licensed site professional from Western Solutions, who summarized supplemental sampling and next steps.

Soukup said a phase‑2 addendum prepared after the EPA lowered its lifetime health advisory level prompted an expanded disposal boundary to include additional airport‑owned parcels. Teams resampled approximately 20 homes on the West Side that were within or abutting the expanded boundary; initial sampling was completed in September and a follow‑up round occurred in December. Of the original targeted properties, Soukup said 4 homes exceeded applicable screening levels in the team’s review (three exceeded the MassDEP groundwater standard of 20 parts per trillion and one exceeded the EPA MCL of 4 ppt). The airport provided bottled water to affected households immediately and offered town‑water connections to homes within the disposal boundary that had any PFAS detection, Soukup said.

\"We offered connection to all homes that are within the disposal site boundary that had any detection of PFAS,\" Soukup said.

Soukup said signatory PFAS signatures were used to distinguish the airport source from a separate Pine Tree Road source. Two West‑side homes with detections between 4 and 20 ppt showed a Pine Tree signature rather than the airport signature; three detections that exceeded MassDEP levels had at least partial airport signatures. Property owners were notified immediately, laboratory reports were shared, and the airport supplied bottled water and then scheduled connections to town water for qualifying homes. Soukup reported that several residents declined access requests and would not be sampled after repeated attempts.

The team installed eight off‑site monitoring wells in December to better define groundwater flow on the West Side; one of those wells was placed inside the airport fence where road work made placement outside the fence impractical. Groundwater elevation measurements and a spring sampling round are planned to better define flow direction and concentration trends.

For long‑term cleanup the LSP said the Phase 3 evaluation — due to MassDEP by March 3 — analyzes remedial alternatives for soil and groundwater, including monitored natural attenuation, capping, excavation with on‑site or off‑site treatment, relocation and treatment of geothermal extraction/injection systems, expanded pump‑and‑treat systems, and in‑situ treatment (injection of activated carbon to create treatment curtains). Soukup said the Phase 3 will balance effectiveness, implementability and cost and will identify a preferred alternative for subsequent design work.

Soukup and commissioners discussed the role of the airport’s geothermal (open‑loop) system and whether treating or relocating that system could reduce spread of contamination to the west. Commissioners requested the IRA status report (due at month end) and the Phase 3 alternatives report; staff said both will be available for the March meeting and that the IRA status report will be the comprehensive document to share with town officials.

Commissioners asked for clear communications to the town about the results and steps taken; staff said letters and laboratory reports were sent to homeowners who had detections and that a full IRA status report will document maps and recommended boundary changes for formal submittal to MassDEP.","Consultants reported expanded disposal‑site boundaries after supplemental sampling, installation of eight monitoring wells, and offers to connect affected homes to town water; the commission was briefed on a Phase 3 remedial alternatives analysis due to MassDEP.",{"_33":111,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":112,"_41":113,"_43":114,"_45":115,"_47":116,"_49":117,"_51":118,"_53":119,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":120,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":121,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6338569,"Airport commission approves ARFF truck changes, ramp lighting design and related contract amendments",238,180000,418000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2269831-38d45925f536e2576b522c8acd96d923&start=180&end=418","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2269831-38d45925f536e2576b522c8acd96d923/thumbnail_180000.jpg","/articles/6338569/Nantucket-County/Massachusetts/Airport-commission-approves-ARFF-truck-changes-ramp-lighting-design-and-related-contract-amendments","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6338569-8361f1fb89a8c09a694d5bfadd25eb03/orig.mp4?Expires=1776410604&Signature=oey5ZsDX4FfWKCvKA~bdkdqSYh3pJgrQLZMy9NGVPIEVc2VUM~4YAiKn47QH-7hwHUffsZzGL6larPPSojX6p5NaroMawG1FO165C2i0FHNY2xQVe3PmaWuqFQZCfAZwNnO4dvQRtfQMGaIhF7CASF3s10IsDMRBRMroKOzHTX-ziO5qe03YrNJibHpGfsmu8Ofkh0xpveob2ary98f-7dvZUyioj9dUcDsZ9aZOfBVYryoLS-qjp~b78mfHoCRzb8btl4ZUZrod7l8ESrAni8bwn~wypPeA01PyXfcdFpyMcFhvS~f~yRLWzJKXKjGkJCMO0loXOYy3y0ONEjJjdQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","At its Feb. 11 meeting, the Nantucket Memorial Airport Commission voted to approve a package of contracts and contract amendments covering airport firefighting equipment, construction change orders and a design task order for ramp lighting.

The package approved included: a $53,410 contract with Hortonville Consulting (including $49,160 for three years of annual Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting, ARFF, training and on‑truck foam testing); Pearl Construction change order No. 4 for $19,616.55 (covering a $10,000 passthrough for domestic fire and water suppression connections to the dormitory building, $3,627.35 for future gate base work and $5,989.20 for plumbing and electrical upgrades to modular housing); a credit and calendar extension with Industrial Protection Systems (a $1,469.25 credit plus schedule adjustment); an Oshkosh change order for $26,873 to add an onboard foam proportioning system to an ARFF truck; and a $253,700 task order with McFarland Johnson for ramp lighting design and photometric analysis.

Airport staff said the onboard foam proportioning system was not in the original truck scope because the specification predated military and FAA moves to recognize fluorine‑free foams; the new equipment makes that capability available to the airport and eligible for typical AIP cost splits, staff said. McFarland Johnson’s design work will evaluate dark‑skies‑compliant fixtures and photometrics for the south and commercial ramps; staff described the task order as large because it includes expanded photometric analysis and means-and-methods planning.

The commission approved the combined package by roll call. The chair called for a motion to approve the contracts; after a second, commissioners voted in the affirmative by roll call. Votes recorded on the package included Miss Topham (Aye), Ms. Garen (Aye), Mr. Marks (Aye) and the chair (Aye).

Staff said one item — a license for the lamp ramp — will be continued to the March meeting and the airport manager agreement will be administered separately.

The approvals allow procurement and design work to proceed; staff recommended the actions be approved so that equipment deliveries, contractor work and design schedules can remain on track for upcoming construction windows and grant eligibility.","The Nantucket Memorial Airport Commission voted to approve several contracts and change orders, including additional equipment for a new ARFF truck, change orders for dormitory utilities and modular-house adjustments, and a task order for ramp lighting design work.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: warrants, contracts, housing policy, town repayment and fuel revolver cap approved

Consultants present terminal HVAC and geothermal options; treating or relocating geothermal wells discussed as PFAS remedy

South ramp air‑quality modeling shows net emissions declines; commission narrows sound‑barrier choice to perforated PVC with mineral wool

PFAS sampling prompts expanded disposal boundary; several homes offered town water connections

Airport commission approves ARFF truck changes, ramp lighting design and related contract amendments