[{"_1":2,"_87":-5,"_88":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":72,"_74":72},"mediaId",6336256,"mediaKeyId","2286572-aab8f0b8216c41d60b4716fedb1507fd","parentId",2286572,"title","Natural Resources Committee adopts authorization and oversight plan after heated debate over agency shakeups, NOAA and DOGE involvement","audioSeconds",10521,"startMs",2760000,"endMs",13281000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2286572-aab8f0b8216c41d60b4716fedb1507fd&start=2760&end=13281","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2286572-aab8f0b8216c41d60b4716fedb1507fd/thumbnail_2760000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6336256/Natural-Resources-Committee-adopts-authorization-and-oversight-plan-after-heated-debate-over-agency-shakeups-NOAA-and-DOGE-involvement","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6336256-7fdfc3f33f2e89730f6576df7ec29c07/orig.mp4?Expires=1777271036&Signature=Q80FxuEpanF5mChWY~717JDYHyxfD-ymT8Ocs6510cRC4oefINzeOVbd8hjfo7UeurB82MM3dPCpmFtB354o0KoraelvANOrCSauJ6SebJckvicUoPFt0TBaNfAY6c8L0SSDWAilguLcUKCo9XG8rlaRPj9AKtmn-ONFEfqnNegXBVBAtDTSFQ9ncDRPBdZ~YILeGb3~hCo8P~hbh7LPRLUzgf68ujnsRIIwc8lwh72XObz8VYjDd~mywH~hB8uMhjTWko2vG~p13XoqEyi3yhGt1PHL1Q046ZNRxbW6dO9jl-UQPQCC~hKe2rXTx48108CZQg5LhbuKfKUWFgziXQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","U.S. House Committee on Natural Resources","date","2025-02-12T22:32:20.143Z","article","The House Committee on Natural Resources approved its authorization and oversight plan for the 119th Congress after an extended markup marked by partisan back‑and‑forth over the committee's priorities and how aggressively it should scrutinize recent executive actions affecting federal agencies.

Chair Westerman framed the plan as a roadmap to \"strengthen America's environment and economy, unlocking our energy and mineral resources, promoting access to our public lands, stewarding wildlife and fisheries, and tackling drought in the West.\" Ranking Member Huffman sharply criticized the majority's approach, calling the proposal \"not a real oversight plan\" and saying it \"looks the other way\" on recent actions that committee Democrats said are undermining federal agencies and programs the public depends on.

A central focus of debate was a series of executive orders and actions referenced in the hearing record, including wide‑ranging personnel moves, an administration initiative referred to repeatedly as \"DOGE\" and described in testimony as involving private personnel accessing agency data, and recent firings of inspectors general. Multiple members argued these developments increase the need for aggressive oversight.

Members proposed and debated numerous amendments. Representative Hoyle offered several NOAA‑related amendments about fisheries and stock assessments; those amendments were voted down by voice or recorded vote. Representative Dexter offered amendments about inspector general firings and the health impacts of mega‑fires; those were also rejected in the roll calls during the session. Representative Elfreth's amendment to add aquatic invasive species to the oversight plan was agreed to by the committee and was incorporated into the plan.

Several amendments specifically sought committee investigations into DOGE access to agency systems, proposed funding freezes, and impacts on NOAA and the National Weather Service; those amendments were opposed by the majority and were not adopted. Ranking Member Huffman and other Democrats repeatedly invoked concerns about suspended or frozen federal hiring, effects on seasonal firefighters and national parks, and delays to water and infrastructure projects caused by funding freezes.

After amendment votes and postponements of some recorded votes, the committee approved the authorization and oversight plan as amended by a recorded roll call. The clerk reported the final tally as 23 ayes and 16 nays, and the plan was approved and ordered as the committee's oversight agenda for the session. The committee also completed a unanimous‑consent package reporting several bills favorably, and scheduled a field hearing in Oklahoma City on Indian and insular affairs issues.

The markup record shows extensive policy disagreement over the scope of oversight the committee will pursue; several members announced they will submit supplemental or minority views in the committee report.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Full Committee Markup","oneSentenceSummary","The committee approved its two‑year authorization and oversight plan after extended debate and dozens of proposed amendments about agency workforce reductions, access to agency data by private actors (\"DOGE\"), NOAA funding and fisheries, inspector general firings, and oversight of Puerto Rico's PROMESA board.","taxTitle","Natural Resources: House Committee, Standing Committees - House & Senate, Congressional Hearings Compilation, Legislative, Federal","taxId",1983,"location","","headline","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":72,"_74":72},6336261,"Natural Resources Committee advances Water Rights Protection Act after partisan debate",10869,1552000,12421000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2286572-aab8f0b8216c41d60b4716fedb1507fd&start=1552&end=12421","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2286572-aab8f0b8216c41d60b4716fedb1507fd/thumbnail_1552000.jpg","/articles/6336261/Natural-Resources-Committee-advances-Water-Rights-Protection-Act-after-partisan-debate","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6336261-c5535c82db726c0e85925211b3afec73/orig.mp4?Expires=1777271036&Signature=nleVoUBYDtrmnGpufEazhd8T9g43jLiPZ58-dwBm8cd4WUeSF8moOgtXQSQxAbmnKYysn-ygWwusT7w3PFpi-r1drtcAdNp6BBQv3OyVlil7c1tn05yyk2VOpNmBO-I7AZLFvyDuFjRQSO~A3eiXVCuv7CEr~C5wwBmv3bYeFdxU~daySTsmIOvGoLEpIChTDRs7b8JCjtFlT-tRiU3vpjllgBQ~~MmJeWVjQOwKVMMAgAT3ojOd0FpdefVsvYmcRipeS1NSVIKyT~xP29LV2qV-EgmCx3RJ8Q3FO8KCadtSVtiq2QhYVCegl-egkw0j9UFmK25fMMCsdNZ8Gi-46w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The House Committee on Natural Resources voted to favorably report HR 302, the Water Rights Protection Act of 2025, after a contentious markup in which members debated whether the bill would protect state water allocations or undermine longstanding federal authorities backing tribal and environmental water claims.

Proponents said the bill would stop federal land managers from conditioning permits on transfer or co-ownership of privately held water rights, preserving state primary control of water allocation. The bill sponsor, Miss Malloy, said the measure is important for her state because \"land management agencies requiring co ownership of water rights\" has been a problem and the bill would \"clear that up.\" The chair urged members to support the measure as a technical fix that prevents federal agencies from imposing stricter regulatory requirements than state law allows.

Opponents warned the bill could constrain federal responsibilities to protect tribal water rights and other reserved federal rights. Mr. Huffman argued the bill has been repeatedly reintroduced as a messaging vehicle and said it \"sidesteps these complexities\" of federal water rights for tribes, national parks, and other federal reservations. He noted that prior Interior Department statements warned the legislation \"would jeopardize the department's ability to protect the lands and resources that it is entrusted to manage on behalf of the American people and the tribes to whom we owe a trust responsibility.\"

During debate Representative Kennedy and others expressed support for state authority over water allocation. Representative Malloy and a cosponsor emphasized the bill contains multiple savings clauses intended to preserve existing federal authorities, and Malloy said the bill \"doesn't impact the Winters doctrine\" or other named federal authorities.

Committee members adopted an amendment in the nature of a substitute offered by Miss Malloy (Malloy A&S) and the chair moved to report the bill favorably to the House. A recorded vote on HR 302 as amended was held later in the markup; the clerk reported the tally as 22 ayes and 16 nays and the committee ordered the bill reported to the House with a favorable recommendation.

The committee postponed additional recorded votes requested on some amendments during the markup but completed a recorded roll call later that reflected the 22–16 result on HR 302 as amended. The motion to reconsider was laid on the table and minority members gave notice of intent to file supplemental or minority views.","The House Natural Resources Committee voted to report HR 302, the Water Rights Protection Act of 2025, after a marked debate about state versus federal authority over water rights and protections for tribal and environmental interests.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Natural Resources Committee adopts authorization and oversight plan after heated debate over agency shakeups, NOAA and DOGE involvement

Natural Resources Committee advances Water Rights Protection Act after partisan debate