[{"_1":2,"_111":-5,"_112":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6337396,"mediaKeyId","2273194-dacc4d34c0d5b565948eaf56e78001fa","parentId",2273194,"title","Votes at a glance: Van Zandt County Commissioners Court passed routine renewals, agreements and solicitations","audioSeconds",1792,"startMs",1016000,"endMs",2808000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2273194-dacc4d34c0d5b565948eaf56e78001fa&start=1016&end=2808","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2273194-dacc4d34c0d5b565948eaf56e78001fa/thumbnail_1016000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6337396/Van-Zandt-County/Texas/Votes-at-a-glance-Van-Zandt-County-Commissioners-Court-passed-routine-renewals-agreements-and-solicitations","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6337396-4f270a522ad93743f32a0cc446ad0a07/orig.mp4?Expires=1771181462&Signature=JH~5mQolB42wVFU5gJBDgDln67KVqBU89GjdRxk1L2p6KIyLoshcnNvSgp7dOWre2fcbarWmImvYXRMSKmhrTqhbJ55DDo6ck7WhV5iuqr5CgFLkLsbU3HjQyHCUsFVmq7dk9oTosn3k0sC3pPc3P2UW8qNehex1qs6RHIwg8lD4oeMwn98CLtX99QPSbQsAYcqtrn43~NscfkukU2GXQce161XzhBUHAeI996J7x-1mjkCY-0CzPIRLTj19HJ2CYoq1KiqqTcWa7SmHP4McaS7TSp~UY6RcCVOHsmSqDA3zS~lbu7dY2ntK6NjpLEUl0hMsYcfbCm4HmnHlModxZQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Van Zandt County TX","date","2025-02-12T14:48:47Z","article","At its meeting the Van Zandt County Commissioners Court approved multiple routine items by motion or voice vote. Below are the actions the court recorded as approved and key notes on each item.

- Renew local health authority: Motion to renew Dr. J.W. Dailey as the county’s local health authority for a two-year term passed by voice vote. The role includes performing required inspections for the jail and other county health responsibilities.

- Authorize execution of loan/renewal for static F-4D aircraft display: The court authorized the county judge to sign a renewal with the National Museum of the USAF for the static display of the F-4D aircraft at Veterans Memorial Plaza; the aircraft is on loan and the loan must be reauthorized annually.

- Release county easement(s): The court approved releasing county easements on Landon Street and portions of County Road 3204 in Myrtle Springs; any existing utility easements on the roadway will remain in place per staff explanation.

- Accept payment from City of Edgewood: Court accepted a check from the City of Edgewood in the amount of $1,972.80 for payment of road materials hauled by Van Zandt County (Precinct 3).

- Solicitations for bids: The court authorized solicitation of bids for road/bridle materials (contract period 05/01/2025–04/30/2026) and separately authorized solicitation of bids for Road & Bridge fuel for the contract period 06/01/2025–05/31/2026; staff explained vendors are notified and new vendors can request to be added to vendor lists.

- Cooperative purchasing agreements: The court authorized the county judge to sign a master cooperative purchasing agreement with the Sheriffs Association of Texas (for buy-board purchasing) and an interlocal agreement with Region 8 Education Service Center for cooperative purchasing services (TIPS). Staff said participation can reduce procurement time and potentially lower costs by using awarded vendor contracts.

- Consent agenda: The court approved the consent agenda (routine items) by motion and voice vote.

How votes were recorded: Most items were approved by voice vote with the clerk recording “motion passes”; specific roll-call tallies were not recorded in the transcript for these routine items.

","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Van Zandt County Commissioners Meeting 2/12/2025","oneSentenceSummary","The court approved a number of routine items including the renewal of the local health authority, easement releases, cooperative purchasing agreements and several solicitations for bids; specific vote counts were taken by voice and recorded as passed.","taxTitle","Van Zandt County, Texas","taxId",63777,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6337400,"Commissioners approve Anderson Acres plat for filing; county requires fire and road compliance before leasing",523,2861000,3384000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2273194-dacc4d34c0d5b565948eaf56e78001fa&start=2861&end=3384","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2273194-dacc4d34c0d5b565948eaf56e78001fa/thumbnail_2861000.jpg","/articles/6337400/Van-Zandt-County/Texas/Commissioners-approve-Anderson-Acres-plat-for-filing-county-requires-fire-and-road-compliance-before-leasing","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6337400-3b1747bd669258c01d2bf1fea9714159/orig.mp4?Expires=1771181462&Signature=Qu4x4TFBQuMcn50ZwIgUi6qwWRlmPeygArUMlH0Qzi15Kvk-nNdBIqTqF-yFZIk~1TzADF-MxfK2Y1tPoh6b-nZw4ba87hLh-9NSk6HYQCRl3Er18FtxV-~K6WB9fb40-HmjgnC~oOIBRGMpJ1tYn0V7tJR96-3rZaTyuabwriT12jGj6Y75FbvRCej-maEBWpuKbbOSS7-M3crZXup6uRmSe9nFIDEyOtP4imBGbx6D27vuckGM--F-uZdogR~AG6VKnoPqCacvBSPa95HBQw7SIfWJT2Vw5C3P60gFqV93d4aW75gTpQ2qutyC-UHr~9wbOxdrJreAqEbwH8x3rA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Van Zandt County Commissioners Court approved for filing the plat and supporting documentation for Anderson Acres, a manufactured-home rental community on Farm to Market 1504 in Wills Point (Precinct 3). The developer’s application and supporting papers were presented by precinct staff and county staff; the court’s approval was for filing purposes and does not waive required inspections or variance reviews.

Court discussion noted that roughly 30 manufactured homes are planned for the property. County staff reported several homes already placed too near the county road and inside easement areas; those units must be moved or otherwise brought into compliance. Commissioners and staff emphasized that any variances or deviations from setback or easement requirements must return to the court for formal approval.

Public-safety and permitting steps: The court and staff said the property must pass required inspections from the county fire marshal because Anderson Acres will operate as commercial rental housing (individual units are owned by the property owner and offered for rent). County staff said the developer, who had placed some units before obtaining all permits, has been responsive and is working to resolve outstanding issues. The court’s motion approved the plat for filing purposes; the county will require inspections and proof of compliance before any units are leased for occupancy.

Why it matters: The approval allows the developer to proceed with the formal filing process but preserves the county’s ability to enforce road, setback and fire-safety requirements and to require removal or relocation of units that violate easements. Because the project will be commercial rental housing, additional inspections and documentation are required before tenancy is allowed.

Outcome: Motion to approve the plat for filing purposes carried by voice vote; staff will monitor corrective actions and require final inspections by the fire marshal and county engineers before occupancy approvals are granted.

","The court approved the plat and supporting documents for Anderson Acres, a manufactured-home rental community on FM 1504 in Wills Point (Precinct 3), for filing purposes, while noting some units must be moved out of county easements and that fire-marshal inspections and other compliance steps are required before rental occupancy.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6337404,"Van Zandt commissioners OK resolution to form regional '391' planning commission",217,1121000,1338000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2273194-dacc4d34c0d5b565948eaf56e78001fa&start=1121&end=1338","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2273194-dacc4d34c0d5b565948eaf56e78001fa/thumbnail_1121000.jpg","/articles/6337404/Van-Zandt-County/Texas/Van-Zandt-commissioners-OK-resolution-to-form-regional-391-planning-commission","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6337404-e01efb54607221ba876c391faee16139/orig.mp4?Expires=1771181462&Signature=lOcpzgoFWOuPNmsBp20RkdcD7m9YxJmSDPv6Ad79ueAvQeF-xJ5Vrypmga62hb4z-mio5g1AZo61JH-mn2TT-nT9hrOTUHFTflgjNQ~tE9qQkuw-xPbUJExaPM5DAhaSAeRBHCmqR4uINE4zs-NQOqZPfCBo1ngVYIGUPwOgHNjaOcVUgza-s39aSUN7WZKS-nVzoEB-bAKCNazTMDpCNwvidfUX7HE0ElQkBwpJhwbZD~h1hRYoFrFmcOU2NKbxDvvs-KSdh-xpiquh4WDd0mcRypcNtxSXnWr3uM4wVLCR1uCUyOj8UNuA6ICoMuGkdJLot4uH4AQXyqGI0obYPw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Van Zandt County Commissioners Court approved a resolution authorizing the county to participate in a Chapter 391 regional planning commission, a joint body intended to improve regional information-sharing with neighboring municipalities and counties.

A commissioner introduced the resolution saying the regional planning body would allow Van Zandt County and partner jurisdictions to request information from state and federal agencies more efficiently. Several commissioners said the commission would have broad, region-wide purposes, including environmental issues and infrastructure such as water, and that it would not itself make law but could coordinate responses and requests for information.

Why it matters: The commission is structured to give participating jurisdictions combined leverage in dealing with state and federal agencies. Several commissioners framed the initiative as a tool to respond to or scrutinize proposed renewable-energy developments (solar, wind and battery-storage projects) and other land-use or environmental issues that could affect rural residents.

Outcome: The court voted in favor of executing the resolution and order to form the Chapter 391 commission. The vote was taken by voice; specific roll-call counts were not recorded in the transcript.

What it does not do: Commissioners clarified the 391 commission has no authority to enact laws; it is a planning and coordination mechanism. Any formal land-use restrictions or ordinances would remain within the statutory authority of each participating jurisdiction.

Next steps: County staff will prepare the formal resolution and identify partner counties and municipalities for the regional commission. The court did not set boundaries or membership details at this meeting; those will be addressed as other counties and cities indicate interest.

","The court approved a resolution authorizing Van Zandt County to join a regional Chapter 391 planning commission to coordinate information-sharing with other counties and municipalities; some commissioners said the body could be used to address renewable energy projects and environmental concerns.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6337409,"Van Zandt County commissioners table call for May jail bond after public and internal concern",1646,814000,2460000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2273194-dacc4d34c0d5b565948eaf56e78001fa&start=814&end=2460","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2273194-dacc4d34c0d5b565948eaf56e78001fa/thumbnail_814000.jpg","/articles/6337409/Van-Zandt-County/Texas/Van-Zandt-County-commissioners-table-call-for-May-jail-bond-after-public-and-internal-concern","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6337409-80c0c1ad5e9ef5a4c5b1b22701a5419a/orig.mp4?Expires=1771181462&Signature=H7D62QzyUGYJJyHJtQ4ZfxizaMZYlTjGj4ka4pXQ7CJ~qbyIf2M1mED-gWj7RRt1YzKI9~~OGpfomHdljwl7UIuEWfArIb8rsrqqPFGtMDrFvYCTZaj6fIT8yHFAPHyCw287q~NGSYj5k2QcyBMOvtsGvDBVjTmHHgX6I8Cl0zkMSvpSps5a-exo0g0mtPKubV7hzu~M~3E2BwMSLZhQW-74Ql3bui11zM2w7zCxLKMwEQSBog9QT9rywNtRzYbgQGN3mQbVUsBV2UVwQaHGH6EEslE2c18E0zczNbnOXH5JDA06gbnC~vhtWw1mAX~ZoT5qdAKUPoio3WMNRUZ3sg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Van Zandt County Commissioners Court on a motion voted to table a call for a countywide bond election on a proposed new jail, deferring the decision to allow more public outreach and additional information gathering.

Resident Thomas Duke urged the court to indefinitely suspend plans for a proposed new jail he said is estimated at $145,000,000, calling the project “unaffordable” and arguing the county should first address chronic shortages of deputies and jailers before pursuing a large construction bond. “If we spend $145,000,000 on a new jail complex, we will never be able to hire and retain an adequate force,” Duke told the court during the public-comment period.

The court’s action came after back-and-forth among commissioners about timing and public understanding. One commissioner said a May election would give voters a chance to decide; others said the public remains confused about what is included in the proposal and asked for more time to present facts and estimates, including operating costs associated with a larger jail. County staff advised the legal timeline for calling an election in May was narrow and that the statutory window for that May date would close on the coming Friday, which constrained immediate options.

Why it matters: Commissioners framed the decision as balancing statutory deadlines with the need to ensure residents have clear information before voting on a major capital bond and the operating costs that would follow. The item affects county fiscal planning, sheriff’s office staffing and operations, and potentially how Van Zandt County houses inmates if the county is declared noncompliant with state requirements.

Key details discussed: the currently cited estimates and operational context included a proposed facility size discussed in court (a 350-bed concept was mentioned), the county’s current jail bed count identified in debate as 144, an analyst projection cited in discussion that recommended a roughly 280-bed minimum by 2040, and a county official’s reference to a state-jail-commission letter warning that failure to have a plan could put the county into noncompliance and require shipping inmates to other counties at an estimated cost the court discussed of about $5,000,000 per year.

Outcome and next steps: The court voted to table the item; members agreed to pause the May call and pursue additional information and public outreach, with the discussion indicating a preference to revisit the proposal for a bond election in November to allow time for town-hall meetings and further analysis. County staff said tabling will give the court several months to compile additional cost estimates, operating-cost scenarios and public briefings before the next vote.

What was not decided: The court did not adopt a final plan for jail size, financing structure, nor did it adopt a binding tax or bond package. Commissioners emphasized that, if a bond fails, state rules would limit how soon the county could present another bond for the same purpose (disagreement in the discussion indicated a three-year restriction was in play, and commissioners said the state may be considering longer restrictions), but the court did not adopt any new ordinance on that issue.

Public outreach and context: Court members noted a recent town-hall meeting in Wills Point and a prior larger protest over taxes the previous year; several commissioners said they want to improve public explanation of what the bond would cover and how operating costs would be handled. The county judge and county staff agreed to schedule additional briefings and to provide clearer written materials ahead of any future bond call.

Votes at the meeting: The court’s motion to table the May bond-election call passed by voice vote (recorded as “motion passes to table” in the minutes). The court instructed staff to assemble further information and indicated plans to re-evaluate timing with a likely target of November for a possible bond election.

Closing note: No binding financing decisions were made at the meeting. The court moved other routine business forward and scheduled additional public outreach on the jail and courthouse projects over the summer.

","After lengthy public comment and debate, the Van Zandt County Commissioners Court voted to table a motion to call a countywide bond election for a proposed new jail and agreed to pursue further public outreach and information before scheduling a later election.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: Van Zandt County Commissioners Court passed routine renewals, agreements and solicitations

Commissioners approve Anderson Acres plat for filing; county requires fire and road compliance before leasing

Van Zandt commissioners OK resolution to form regional '391' planning commission

Van Zandt County commissioners table call for May jail bond after public and internal concern