[{"_1":2,"_132":-5,"_133":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99,111,123],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6749516,"mediaKeyId","2341347-2f0bb3e0b923ab30af88eb017c08fe62","parentId",2341347,"title","Votes at a glance: San Marcos council actions Feb. 18, 2025","audioSeconds",351,"startMs",2129000,"endMs",2480000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2341347-2f0bb3e0b923ab30af88eb017c08fe62&start=2129&end=2480","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2341347-2f0bb3e0b923ab30af88eb017c08fe62/thumbnail_2129000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6749516/San-Marcos-City/Hays-County/Texas/Votes-at-a-glance-San-Marcos-council-actions-Feb-18-2025","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6749516-a6310c9a657466ca3fe25aaf49428b95/orig.mp4?Expires=1776034200&Signature=NJlPbWpZUlofNVTYnKa2IhcME2gLIcBKGQilYNJtC7h48XLFkvqoZch4Ezp034-ziZeBJQdV57tdtZp9CrLPnTCt6jgWI2w2QDlSdYt27aZu2BA1Kfst~rkL6ti1lCDzxrUqOzKDtFSq1UpNAhYr3JgMCd~7xAElLHOwn9e7TMM0a5BeE2oNCbQTnw7wi1eAiFF3KS~3L6uf2FB8Q9RVQ-iOglHpeMiCq9sGrxyqKSgcDQhRjsdPOAgc-TkeHbTUZRtLsYLreF8Op7o3AqlwhKionnAtilOi1y9NlqvrVD~5lR3JpvYW-IwggC1yjgDAtgf9LlNm6M1DQW7vbwHuRg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","San Marcos","date","2025-02-18T18:04:00Z","article","The San Marcos City Council recorded the following formal actions at its Feb. 18, 2025 regular meeting. Each entry lists the motion text and the recorded outcome as captured in the meeting minutes.

• Consent agenda (items 1–4, 6, 7 and 9): Motion to approve items 1–4, 6, 7 and 9 (items 5 and 8 were pulled for separate consideration). Vote: motion passes 6–0 with 1 absent.

• Item 5 — Resolution 2025‑24R (Pyro Shows of Texas, Inc. change of services for fireworks): Motion to approve resolution authorizing a $39,500 change to the existing fireworks contract (bringing cumulative contract total to $128,700) and authorize the city manager to execute the change. Vote: passes 7–0.

• Item 8 — Resolution 2025‑27R (owner‑requested annexation provision of services): Motion to approve the provision‑of‑services agreement and set a public hearing for the owner‑requested annexation of approximately 63.578 acres near Francis Harris Lane. Vote: passes 5–2.

• Item 11 — Ordinance 2025‑03 (first reading): Motion to amend section 2.024 to increase cumulative allowable amounts for specified council expense accounts (total increase proposed: $90,000). After extended debate, a motion to postpone consideration of Ordinance 2025‑03 to the next meeting passed 6–1. (No ordinance adopted at this meeting.)

• Item 12 — Resolution 2025‑28R (certificates of obligation — multiple capital projects): Motion to direct publication of notice of intent to issue City of San Marcos combination tax and revenue certificates of obligation for certain capital projects, in an amount not to exceed $47,805,000. Vote: passes 6–0 with 1 absent.

• Item 13 — Resolution 2025‑29R (certificates of obligation — wastewater treatment plant): Motion to direct publication of notice of intent to issue certificates of obligation for the new wastewater treatment plant, in an amount not to exceed $20,000,000. Vote: passes 7–0.

• Item 14 — Resolution 2025‑30R (adopt council strategic plan FY2025–26): Motion to adopt the City Council Strategic Plan for FY2025–26 as amended to include explicit language implementing recommendations from the San Marcos Transportation Equity Cabinet. Vote: passes 7–0.

• Items 15–16 — Appointments: Council appointed members to the comprehensive plan oversight committee and to multiple boards and commissions (airport advisory, construction board of appeals, economic development board, housing authority slot, library board, neighborhood commission, parking advisory board, senior advisory board and others). Appointment votes shown in the record passed (listed nominees were approved by recorded votes; majority were 7–0 where noted in the minutes).

Ending: The council entered executive session and later reconvened; no additional public actions were recorded after the votes above.

","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","San Marcos - City Council on 2025-02-18 6:00 PM - 630 E. Hopkins St. This will be an in-person and online meeting. To view the meeting please go to http://sanmarcostx.gov/421/City-Council-Videos-Archives or watch on Grande channel 16 or Spectrum channel 10. - Feb 18, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","A consolidated list of the recorded motions and votes from the San Marcos City Council’s Feb. 18, 2025 meeting.","taxTitle","San Marcos City, Hays County, Texas","taxId",9292,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6749521,"San Marcos council sets hearing, approves annexation service agreement amid water and transparency questions over proposed data center",1941,869000,2810000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2341347-2f0bb3e0b923ab30af88eb017c08fe62&start=869&end=2810","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2341347-2f0bb3e0b923ab30af88eb017c08fe62/thumbnail_869000.jpg","/articles/6749521/San-Marcos-City/Hays-County/Texas/San-Marcos-council-sets-hearing-approves-annexation-service-agreement-amid-water-and-transparency-questions-over-proposed-data-center","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6749521-6c8c3ccc284681a4ed0d48356bdb3942/orig.mp4?Expires=1776034200&Signature=au-auqm6u1F4lO~BKt9kNBqUGyFuFZo18UlfHQhJ6iXQZckCTh87mWAh~psHANX~1liK7mDzC81SF6ko1CEH61QWI9kTq9D5Ju5n8iJDG-Eer9G7UoIDxSnWg4D4SY7e5i0dKwKaAJoG-qk1Ak03QdupUL-Mlildiff5u8mOIDW7jJilEoNY8kbj5Pk-RdCjsJgZuPizS6lZyv8RdOKn370WWe-HmietHcUQGQyvVIPrr3NUGL462k77hesWVfB84DcUv2UZO-x49f7cEo4TbEnjARookI9wk-JlRWi7WIIJY3Sq6vSBAlWrl50n9E-5VW8weKcZ2XfKMtXFDdwQiA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The San Marcos City Council on Feb. 18 heard a staff presentation and public comment about a request to change the comprehensive-plan preferred‑scenario map from “conservation cluster” to “commercial employment low” for approximately 200 acres near Francis Harris Lane, a step required to allow light‑industrial zoning the applicant says would permit a data center.

John Mayberry, the property owner who said he is selling acreage to a data‑center buyer, told council the facility would use a closed‑loop water system and generate relatively low on‑site traffic, and that electricity would come from Pedernales Electric. “We are working with the data center buyer to answer the questions as they arise,” Mayberry said. He also said the project would not be affiliated with media‑reported companies that some speakers identified in news accounts.

Amanda Hernandez, the city’s director of planning and development services, briefed the council on process: the preferred‑scenario map amendment must precede any zoning request; the property is partially in the city’s extraterritorial jurisdiction; and a future zoning application would specify setbacks, pervious cover and other technical requirements. Her staff and the applicant indicated the proposed data center’s cooling approach is a closed‑loop system that continuously reuses the same water, which the applicant said limits wastewater discharged to the city system.

Residents and nearby landowners asked detailed questions at the meeting and during the planning‑and‑zoning hearing. Jennifer Lindsey asked about noise and lighting standards, building size, estimated daily water use and whether the data center would rely on public drinking water. Gina Fleming and other residents raised concerns about references on a company website claiming a flagship Cloudburst data center in San Marcos and said public reporting tied the site to Energy Transfer LP; Fleming said she had found reporting about prior criminal convictions involving Energy Transfer in other states and asked about groundwater and long‑term water contracts.

Council members asked staff whether the city had any other active data‑center applications (staff said none), whether other landowners might be working with data‑center companies (staff confirmed there had been interest expressed), and whether the city could prevent a data center from being built if zoning and entitlements were later approved (staff explained council could deny rezoning at the zoning hearing stage). Council also discussed conflict‑of‑interest rules and recusal procedures after one councilmember raised potential ties public commenters had flagged.

Council approved a provision‑of‑services agreement and set a public hearing date for the annexation (Resolution 2025‑27R). The vote on the services agreement was 5–2. The preferred‑scenario map change itself requires a public‑hearing process and a subsequent council decision after planning and zoning and neighborhood commission hearings.

Ending: Staff said it will gather additional information requested by council and public commentators and include that information in the public‑hearing packets. Any zoning application would return to council later for a separate vote.

","The San Marcos City Council on Feb. 18 heard a staff presentation and public comment about a request to change the comprehensive‑plan preferred‑scenario map and approved a services agreement setting a public hearing for an owner‑requested annexation near Francis Harris Lane.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6749526,"San Marcos residents demand transparency after police shooting of Malachi Williams",1816,260000,2076000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2341347-2f0bb3e0b923ab30af88eb017c08fe62&start=260&end=2076","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2341347-2f0bb3e0b923ab30af88eb017c08fe62/thumbnail_260000.jpg","/articles/6749526/San-Marcos-City/Hays-County/Texas/San-Marcos-residents-demand-transparency-after-police-shooting-of-Malachi-Williams","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6749526-6594f1601339a9285ac014da2f6ac407/orig.mp4?Expires=1776034200&Signature=fb5hoN~dJDvbbipBJJ3w5m9LdZWdEbRXq6e6LuoeYeas5Z~x7-wQagCLZ3AaqpZAOn-EF7mGNS~zUsX4NW1m0iq67j7p6VD4xiU0QbAMBZW8RTxEpLQaeQvmttsCQSckpMTCgL0iT3cheA~mBfaUSw6LgB87Pu0~TV1Y5M8fCAJ6CL3NHyXRR2ODoqGfC1EPay9jYygAVeTNtYyI8HLa4M2cfNRhXyjh8tlYmquJOEXpXqV9sEYXzZ0MVdpTYRHKU4NhDiv2Mqj-JJjEL5K6E0z6V4X3DyWJxKmOhfxqsIpsMX6uiVUCF8DfNVGHJZpSSE1pJDNH8x252~6f~hE5TQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Dozens of residents urged the San Marcos City Council on Feb. 18 to press for transparency and accountability after the April 2024 fatal shooting of 22‑year‑old Malachi Williams.

At the meeting’s start, Ashley Prevost, a San Marcos resident, said the police department’s narrative conflicted with bystander video and accused officials of manipulating evidence. “What happened here wasn’t just a failure of policy, it was a failure of humanity,” Prevost said. Multiple speakers later described bystander footage that they say shows officers failing to provide medical aid while Williams bled and was handcuffed.

The city’s public commenters named Officer Alex Ventura as the officer who fired the shots, said the department’s body camera footage cuts out at the moment shots were fired, and reported that medics were ultimately forced to ask officers to remove handcuffs so life‑saving treatment could proceed. Jack Thornton, a volunteer and community organizer, said the bystander video undercuts a departmental press briefing and asked, “Why no better attempt to restrain him?…Why the partial footage?” Multiple speakers asked who served on the grand jury that declined to indict and requested independent review of the San Marcos Police Department’s actions and communications with outside organizations.

Several commenters raised concerns about the involvement of the Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas (CLEAT). Sloan Rucker, a local resident, noted CLEAT’s past lobbying against expanded disclosure of police misconduct records and told the council it “raises a ton of red flags” about transparency. Speakers also questioned why Williams was reportedly transported to a medical facility in Kyle rather than closer options in San Marcos.

Family members and friends addressed the council directly. An online commenter who identified herself as Shanta Miller said, “Malachi is my son. I love my son so very, very much,” and asked the council to acknowledge what she described as an unjust killing. Sam Benavides, speaking for community members who have supported the family, described witness footage showing officers searching Williams’ pockets while he bled and said medics had to request that handcuffs be loosened to permit treatment.

Council members did not take action during the citizen‑comment period. The comments were placed on the public record and will remain part of the meeting minutes. Residents repeatedly asked the council to pursue independent review of the shooting, to disclose CLEAT’s role at the scene, and to provide information about the grand jury process in this case. The council did not announce any new investigative steps during the Feb. 18 regular meeting.

The meeting record shows a sustained and repeated demand from the community for additional fact‑gathering and transparency; the council may address those requests in future agenda items or during staff follow‑up.

Ending: Councilmembers proceeded to the scheduled consent agenda and subsequent business; no formal action on the shooting was taken at the Feb. 18 meeting.","Dozens of residents urged the San Marcos City Council on Feb. 18 to press for transparency and accountability after the April 2024 fatal shooting of 22‑year‑old Malachi Williams.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6749517,"San Marcos council delays vote on ordinance to raise council expense allowances after extended debate",3009,4103000,7112000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2341347-2f0bb3e0b923ab30af88eb017c08fe62&start=4103&end=7112","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2341347-2f0bb3e0b923ab30af88eb017c08fe62/thumbnail_4103000.jpg","/articles/6749517/San-Marcos-City/Hays-County/Texas/San-Marcos-council-delays-vote-on-ordinance-to-raise-council-expense-allowances-after-extended-debate","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6749517-f8830d3a4b39f47d7d12b6b348804e08/orig.mp4?Expires=1776034200&Signature=SbXQnmuqCt~jYrXMt9qvPW6dqZnuTzpJbDEbscwMUxw6ixlgASdrM~P8vcqngunCqXupQo9rHQTy2xjH-rH7a0pWj2d7k1UFN3LbRBSZilmLsRl8qB4t7MdE1hI8jn1uaHzCdcPuwF9cNRjAzR~d3dFMGCDIKxaB4QdWVsKhGF2MEt~8XPF9t0Z7f721j9dCq2obH9R0DDxCI3Dzm4GW4igkqNA7RX4dI~cxdAVwb9YMYUW0SI5eHKjLDDrDIeRRcapTGaPhP4zUwlb0eGQ6V9ZzZeofn32ZfPZvLGEmns6vCTGLqldDKKRQnDD5B3mJwV5kJmotFo~tNpjcuGn4~w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The San Marcos City Council extensively debated Ordinance 2025‑03, a measure to increase cumulative allowable council expenses by $90,000, and ultimately voted to postpone consideration to a later meeting.

Councilmember Reyes (first referenced by surname in the public record) led a critique of bringing a midyear budget change before the council without fuller documentation; she argued for stronger accountability measures, including per‑city IRS per diem references, written explanations of educational benefits and stricter missing‑receipt limits. “This is taxpayer money and there are rules governing that kind of money,” Reyes said, urging a slower, more transparent process and promising proposed amendments.

Other councilmembers supported raising allowances to reflect higher travel, lodging and conference costs and to reduce barriers for newer or working‑class councilmembers who may otherwise be unable to attend professional‑development events. Councilmember Scott framed the proposal as a way to keep pace with rising travel costs and support professional development for council members new to office. City staff and finance staff explained accounting and procedural details including how some funds had been found midyear and how the city’s procurement card and reimbursement processes work.

Council debated multiple technical clarifications — for example how the existing allowances related to health‑insurance waivers for certain government‑employee councilmembers, whether some amounts should be rolled into a single stipend line or remain as separate reimbursable accounts, and the mechanics for reallocating unused funds to other members. Several members asked staff for an infographic that maps the narrative policy language to annual and monthly dollar totals so that voters and the public can more easily understand changes.

After those discussions, a motion to postpone the ordinance to the next council meeting carried 6–1. Councilmembers said they will return with proposed amendments, a clearer chart and suggested edits to the language (including clarity about compensation components tied to insurance), and that staff will produce supporting documentation for public review before a final vote.

Ending: Council did not adopt the ordinance Feb. 18; the item was postponed for further amendment and will return to council for additional consideration.","The San Marcos City Council extensively debated Ordinance 2025‑03, a proposal to raise cumulative allowable council expenses by $90,000, and voted to postpone the item after questions about timing, transparency and procedural detail.",{"_33":112,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":113,"_41":114,"_43":115,"_45":116,"_47":117,"_49":118,"_51":119,"_53":120,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":121,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":122,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6749508,"San Marcos council fills multiple boards and commission vacancies at Feb. 18 meeting",43,7641000,7684000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2341347-2f0bb3e0b923ab30af88eb017c08fe62&start=7641&end=7684","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2341347-2f0bb3e0b923ab30af88eb017c08fe62/thumbnail_7641000.jpg","/articles/6749508/San-Marcos-City/Hays-County/Texas/San-Marcos-council-fills-multiple-boards-and-commission-vacancies-at-Feb-18-meeting","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6749508-3f056d795fa2935f2e3df421f457aac2/orig.mp4?Expires=1776034200&Signature=VZD7XtwDBMFZn8RHlvkaICpyoKVsWrAhiKrsES54~-fOdHHzhJY7kx8JQJzJQ1cWWBtnxe4X-NZqJhzL4I8AxwXPsUIVlRmgMrte6NLrkP3AEnQ~sd6lBvmzxMOuSLs8k39qrXxwGxD-YlXSTbMQohak-SnhNRa8G~~X0tAp0YJI8XurPkSr3li~qtxp5Q1UtfHqCQ4erhXMixMwsZJ7a-6Emv8Eew-naRTIy3mB~dwRnvDnQSaav1F4gEP5XMo4dqsN3vE-xsFcqJyGTshnpCbeGli5TEK4KFFB8EQgvKJqP~JonWR-zJrsG1VM80mBtYmCvfOKzMl5hp4wtTcVyQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","At its Feb. 18 meeting the San Marcos City Council filled seats on the comprehensive plan oversight committee and appointed members to a range of boards and commissions.

Councilmembers nominated and approved the following slate (nominator in parentheses where given): Rosalie S. Ray (nominated by Amanda Hernandez), Gabrielle Moore (nominated for parking advisory/downtown representation), Cody DeSalvo, James Pendergast (library board), Michael Williams (economic development board), Mark Murray (neighborhood commission sector 9), and additional nominees for the senior citizen advisory board and others. The minutes record that appointment votes passed; numerous ballots were recorded as unanimous (7–0) where shown.

Councilmembers said they selected nominees who had been active in prior focus groups, planning efforts or professional roles related to their assigned boards and noted that some applicants were deeply familiar with the comprehensive‑plan process.

Ending: Staff will notify appointees, update the city’s boards‑and‑commissions roster and post the updated membership lists to the city website.","Council appointed members to the comprehensive‑plan oversight committee and to multiple boards and commissions, including the airport advisory board, library board, neighborhood commission, parking advisory board and senior citizen advisory board. Appointments were approved by recorded votes and, where shown in the minutes, passed unanimously.",{"_33":124,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":125,"_41":126,"_43":115,"_45":115,"_47":127,"_49":118,"_51":128,"_53":129,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":130,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":131,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6749512,"San Marcos council adopts 2025–26 strategic plan and adds Transportation Equity Cabinet recommendations",0,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2341347-2f0bb3e0b923ab30af88eb017c08fe62&start=7641&end=7641","/articles/6749512/San-Marcos-City/Hays-County/Texas/San-Marcos-council-adopts-202526-strategic-plan-and-adds-Transportation-Equity-Cabinet-recommendations","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6749512-b1b34dcb8dbc47faeb02aee4277c19ea/orig.mp4?Expires=1776034200&Signature=EauM--MDlVzH~yZ0bzsvB5VCB~zMPxK7-d91yDp8kk8ZhBGaPicoEiK0ZGeP00xjnwtSj5PSqxE-ZB4yL~joD2yNO1H3KY6JdgVmNkntOJQTqU2w00dDiHfVhQamRcaBWOqRqkwpBALuewQ3bntVjKQWQn5Fym31pTMC9-nNrNdbxCX2fUptmOiJ9VnqxWZg9DzY8fFZvPLYGT~Scch-KqqPa3F-RNyvl9qTz1frGkxMamRBBQxK~Xp-PjLYIpAx8i3~4y3YAzk2hKTsfw3vMr8Qi67VJEQfy3DoObwM6CFHXLvkm7md7cK9x8cl722huGpS-t~1hGAD6h8gGohYfQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The San Marcos City Council unanimously adopted the City Council Strategic Plan for fiscal year 2025–26 on Feb. 18 and added a narrowly worded amendment to implement recommendations from the San Marcos Transportation Equity Cabinet.

Assistant to the city manager Carrie Fontenot summarized the plan and noted that council had asked staff to incorporate input gathered from community stakeholders and the recent transit‑equity presentation. A councilmember moved to add language directing implementation of Transportation Equity Cabinet recommendations under the mobility and connectivity section; the amendment was seconded and approved 7–0. The council then approved the amended strategic plan by unanimous vote.

Staff said the approved amendment would be reflected in transportation and transit master plans and included in the plan’s implementation schedule; departments responsible for transportation projects will be asked to provide timelines aligned with council direction.

Ending: Council adopted the plan as amended (Resolution 2025‑30R). Staff will coordinate insertion of Transportation Equity Cabinet recommendations into relevant planning documents and bring implementation steps back to council.","The council adopted its FY2025–26 strategic plan and approved an amendment to explicitly implement recommendations from the San Marcos Transportation Equity Cabinet, directing staff to include those recommendations in transportation and transit planning.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: San Marcos council actions Feb. 18, 2025

San Marcos council sets hearing, approves annexation service agreement amid water and transparency questions over proposed data center

San Marcos residents demand transparency after police shooting of Malachi Williams

San Marcos council delays vote on ordinance to raise council expense allowances after extended debate

San Marcos council fills multiple boards and commission vacancies at Feb. 18 meeting

San Marcos council adopts 2025–26 strategic plan and adds Transportation Equity Cabinet recommendations