[{"_1":2,"_123":-5,"_124":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99,111],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6681049,"mediaKeyId","2343649-8a19d43a6e6b9752985386ab6566d62f","parentId",2343649,"title","Votes at a glance: Oldham County Fiscal Court actions this session","audioSeconds",2344,"startMs",1862000,"endMs",4206000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2343649-8a19d43a6e6b9752985386ab6566d62f&start=1862&end=4206","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2343649-8a19d43a6e6b9752985386ab6566d62f/thumbnail_1862000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6681049/Oldham-County/Kentucky/Votes-at-a-glance-Oldham-County-Fiscal-Court-actions-this-session","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6681049-1878dd2d87c0f45f5581c879318762e0/orig.mp4?Expires=1775864328&Signature=DNYxP-kus0Bl8j4cLM55svrsvA8NiXYTuNR056dIrHfH~twXRJ7LDTk0DvtX8DV1ykrxmE3DPwsI9XUzBkDFaM~GbcSvjwM9x3CTnt0GbAMsRXyzUGMCJFSdVIY1fosHgEzjXgfbyAcETW3h393FNCNvO4uk8gIFOD4R4tbXex-2UmRqumc58JdQyPUo0R6jqeKcqA5iXcvx07Lx09ILZMl99EdgIi9MEdxAnY6KI5-5Hvi0wRokcoqlBK8cnGX30gzRPeF-wMufsvuxjW7tmIRCnVjy9OAVPyA9RexWnrXCVhYiH6sWZhH7u5cnIr1ippC7aFWfPDbX90CcsnH0kA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Oldham County","date","2025-02-18T21:52:52.98Z","article","At the meeting the Oldham County Fiscal Court recorded several formal actions. This roundup lists each action, its outcome and key details as recorded in the meeting transcript.

1) Payables (general) — Approved except for one disputed invoice
- Motion: Approve payables presented to the court but withhold payment of a disputed invoice (JKS Architects, invoice number 2) while the court verified contract and minutes.
- Outcome: Approved by roll call; the payables list was accepted with the JKS invoice excluded for further review.

2) JKS Architects invoice (invoice number 2) — Approved after recess
- Motion: Approve payment of invoice number 2 from JKS Architects (amount recorded in the ledger as $136,800; schematic-phase figures were discussed in contract materials).
- Outcome: Approved by roll-call vote (recorded as 4 yes, 2 no, 1 abstention).

3) Jail policy and procedure manual — Approved
- Motion: Approve the jail policy and procedure manual updates required by the state and reviewed by the county attorney and jail committee.
- Outcome: Approved by fiscal court (voice vote).

4) Sheriff’s highway safety grant application (FY 2026) — Authorized
- Motion: Authorize the county judge to sign the Kentucky Office of Highway Safety / NHTSA grant application for $30,000 for highway safety enforcement (seat belts, speed enforcement and related overtime/community initiatives) for federal FY 2026 (projected Oct. 1, 2025–Sept. 30, 2026).
- Outcome: Approved unanimously on voice vote; the county attorney had reviewed the grant.

5) Release of erosion-control surety — Approved
- Motion: Release the erosion-control surety (bond) for Pond Creek Subdivision Section 3 in the amount of $15,000, per engineer recommendation and road committee referral.
- Outcome: Approved unanimously by voice vote.

6) Planning and Zoning Commission appointment — Approved
- Motion: Appoint Quinn (first name as recorded) to the Planning & Zoning Commission to fill Ben Winters’ unexpired term through August 2027.
- Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

Meeting note: Several items generated extended discussion separate from formal votes, notably the JKS invoice and the police headquarters design questions; the court asked administration to provide schematic designs and contract documentation for future review.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Oldham County Fiscal Court February 18, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","Summary of formal votes recorded during the Oldham County Fiscal Court session: payables, JKS invoice, jail policy, Sheriff’s highway safety grant, Pond Creek surety release and a planning commission appointment.","taxTitle","Oldham County, Kentucky","taxId",72448,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6681051,"Oldham County jailer presents annual policy updates; fiscal court approves updated manual",218,692000,910000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2343649-8a19d43a6e6b9752985386ab6566d62f&start=692&end=910","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2343649-8a19d43a6e6b9752985386ab6566d62f/thumbnail_692000.jpg","/articles/6681051/Oldham-County/Kentucky/Oldham-County-jailer-presents-annual-policy-updates-fiscal-court-approves-updated-manual","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6681051-131d7d433220b48a000dbbd13652c2f4/orig.mp4?Expires=1775864328&Signature=OGmIMpVTAdkjva8583Y5jBQSshqp09PwhGrZSMdfFG7MX9kvsbrGE0kbx0gLp5wDig-k2BiV3fWoN7LxbsdCI3qeTvK~y9RiSFiw3A4YUj7aMJinFMlp2JQYRElBMaLc~QDp-PLrXsBR~7kgbePtATxtfMeTzvqOykaWqUUNn0Q5AwE4A~UqoMbBB-g1iSnLa8RW5eXb6Jvg~BymiTKoZEjbCINe~8uV31Ng8nahL4st50WlsTmp4NNnNrdB4nRs-Oc6PjHiwvm8XCA3qBRPhj8UETFCehUFYge-2JtzGa9Klp6rXkrpO2W7pQE0UQmq7nYjr6rEOKo5kYaNupUKfQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Oldham County Jailer Jeff Tyndall presented the annual policy and procedure manual updates required by state oversight and answered magistrates’ questions before fiscal court voted to approve the revisions.

What changed: Tyndall said the manual records policy changes made during the prior year and noted several substantive updates:
- Conducted Electronic Weapon terminology now uses “TASER Energy Weapon.”
- Kentucky law lowered the employment age for some jail positions from 21 to 18; the jail included the change in policy but has not adopted the new lower age for staff who must be around inmates because the facility holds federal detainees.
- The allowable continuous time a person may remain in handcuffs was reduced from 15 minutes to 10 minutes on the jail’s internal timeline, following state recommendation.
- Restraint chair use: the jailer or medical staff must approve keeping an inmate in a restraint chair longer than two hours.
- Denial of admission to the jail must now be approved by the jailer or the nurse on duty rather than by a jail supervisor alone.
- The manual formalized a quarantine period: incoming detainees now remain in a quarantined holding area for at least 10 days prior to movement into the general population; this reflects procedures adopted since COVID.

Vote: After questions about whether the manual is posted publicly (Tyndall said the policy and procedure manual is maintained in-house; the jail handbook has public information), fiscal court moved and approved the manual by voice vote.

Context and process: Tyndall said all changes are reviewed by the county attorney and the jail committee before being finalized and that the revisions were required for the annual filing the state mandates. Magistrates discussed whether the manual should be posted, and Tyndall explained handbooks that contain security-sensitive detail are typically kept in-house.

Ending: The court approved the manual and thanked the jailer for the annual update.","Jailer Jeff Tyndall briefed fiscal court on annual changes to the jail’s policy and procedure manual, including renamed conducted electronic weapon terminology, restraint and handcuff timing limits, quarantine and admission approvals; the court voted to approve the updated manual.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6681052,"Oldham County clerk turns over $513,644.93 in excess fees; announces March Agtag farm‑tag campaign",283,257000,540000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2343649-8a19d43a6e6b9752985386ab6566d62f&start=257&end=540","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2343649-8a19d43a6e6b9752985386ab6566d62f/thumbnail_257000.jpg","/articles/6681052/Oldham-County/Kentucky/Oldham-County-clerk-turns-over-51364493-in-excess-fees-announces-March-Agtag-farmtag-campaign","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6681052-0c20218b7627d365293c2626bfe59b2b/orig.mp4?Expires=1775864328&Signature=Kj2YqCX6lCIrePLrMj~RRfNv7JY2iIeEMZFwpMY08oFOgMKWE352qJpys5j1Ww8ujBAb9li9qyFp7Fo68npQdtNeDdIr9LpjeSzViG3cIPyPi49dvBPVwcZ8bqitDzYJGhHqmMfnAlrTXeMRoxtCWdLyBncOTzvawjSJDgqm3-Nf7XZjHzeK6o9knIoEy3s2OqF1DTuPkXiTjZlV3WzivLsp3L2U4M8w4WxFO2XEjU1PZ4szNHRuHvOXpo4OPKTAj402zdtBw3r8Yplh4GLbefTN7yur--DL~fahXEogsmZUlWNMGB5GH4bBZY51~~Bn~1UZ0LqkSoVRoEpa49Q~mw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Oldham County Clerk Amy Alvey presented the county’s excess fee turnover for 2024 to fiscal court and reported a check for $513,644.93 to be deposited to county accounts.

Alvey said total clerk office revenue increased by approximately $715,000 in the calendar year to $31,503,162. She described the clerk’s office as primarily a pass‑through collector: roughly 95% of revenue collected is distributed to other taxing districts, and expenses increased in line with revenue. She said the office holds a small year‑end balance to allow for final journal entries during the audit process.

Why it matters: The excess fees represent locally available funds derived from the clerk’s operations after operating expenses and required distributions. Alvey told the court the clerk’s office had received audit results for 2023 and will turn over final audited figures as appropriate.

Agtag (farm tag) announcement: Alvey also reminded the court that March is Agtag month. She explained Kentucky’s farm‑tag program offers a specialty plate with an optional $10 donation that funds FFA, 4‑H and Kentucky Proud programs. Alvey said about $931,000 statewide was raised through those $10 donations in 2024; half of the county’s collected donations stay local to support county organizations while the remainder supports state programs. To encourage participation, Oldham County’s clerk’s office will issue raffle tickets to donors for a chance to win hanging baskets grown by the local FFA chapter.

New Prospect facility and operations: Alvey reported the clerk’s new facility on Highway 42 in Prospect is operational, though permanent internet access and some camera installations await better weather and contractor schedules. She said the Prospect library branch has seen strong attendance and program growth.

Ending: Magistrates thanked Alvey for the financial report and for outreach around the Agtag program. The presentation concluded with a brief Q&A about farm‑tag eligibility; Alvey said a farm‑number is required to obtain a farm tag.","County Clerk Amy Alvey presented 2024 revenue and expense totals, handed the county a $513,644.93 check for excess fees, and outlined the March Agtag farm‑tag donation program that benefits local FFA, 4‑H and Kentucky Proud vendors.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6681053,"High Point Charities reports rising demand: nearly half of its clients came from Oldham County in 2024",526,936000,1462000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2343649-8a19d43a6e6b9752985386ab6566d62f&start=936&end=1462","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2343649-8a19d43a6e6b9752985386ab6566d62f/thumbnail_936000.jpg","/articles/6681053/Oldham-County/Kentucky/High-Point-Charities-reports-rising-demand-nearly-half-of-its-clients-came-from-Oldham-County-in-2024","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6681053-1df7360e63e1d6c9b67584a28cc7579b/orig.mp4?Expires=1775864328&Signature=lhRqY31e1OYqaO5rRaC5RmF8VTozv6VYI74HBXsnIKcl3D9MDQNBO~WWfmV1YekM6NhoQfe~Lx-PFKysILQxi2odwWUeXkBizP~~em0O8Xq81km8qhl7~ra9AwY1MnF5PqK~ooL5XW13d97FiRgM3lMYFKX-vdz~IMmp3mkBPmlX16FS906HVxHVT-JVKRbdkyDWVaVo4iyL0Aw3Es0s6xzcVMwR4n0ocob~2aRnkin6QcVMX86ckl66cGUgJ5e1-~13gFWdvZHI5ZAv99yyACgNkWsf17~7uWNWps85npeoWREBijJIwUUPEOU-ouubNFtBzVBrVVLjrGi2bNCoRQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","High Point Charities presented 2024 service data to the Oldham County Fiscal Court on Wednesday, telling magistrates the nonprofit had a 31% increase in services compared with 2019 and that nearly half of its client households are from Oldham County.

The organization’s chief presenter, Amy D’Amico, said High Point provided 30,064 services last year and recorded 19,555 household visits. In Oldham County specifically, High Point served 953 families representing 3,091 people, including roughly 968 children and about 600 older adults. D’Amico said 534 Oldham County families visited High Point monthly and 257 were new to the agency in 2024.

Why it matters: High Point identified itself as one of the primary basic‑needs providers for Oldham County and nearby rural counties. The nonprofit said it distributed $1.5 million in food in 2024 (about $75–$100 of groceries per visit) and about $1.4 million in clothing and home goods through its closet. High Point also reported a weekly community kitchen that has served more than 200 meals per week and operates life‑skills and nutrition classes.

County support and collaboration: D’Amico thanked the fiscal court for prior grants totaling $75,900 in 2022–23 that helped create the High Point Community Kitchen. High Point said the kitchen now employs a part‑time manager, hosts 12 monthly meal provider teams and supports nutrition education and job‑training opportunities tied to hunger reduction.

Red Cross closure and referral network: D’Amico told the court that while the local Red Cross presence has changed, High Point will remain a dependable food resource and will coordinate with two other local food providers — a Bread of Life pantry in North Oldham (Goshen) and a newly approved Crestwood food bank through the South Oldham Interchurch Council — to ensure geographic coverage for families with transportation limits. High Point said it will refer households to agencies that provide rent and utility assistance, such as Oldham County Community Chest and Tri‑County Community Action Agency, when needed.

Local data and poverty coverage: High Point compared the number of people it served to county poverty estimates and reported that in Oldham County the charity reached approximately 90% of the people estimated to be living in poverty; other counties in its service area had coverage rates ranging from 30% to nearly 79% depending on county.

Questions and next steps: Magistrates asked about using the community kitchen for broader life‑skills education. D’Amico said High Point’s first priority is serving households with basic needs and building cooking and nutrition classes for families that meet that need; expanding to broader populations may be considered after the program is meeting core objectives. Court members thanked High Point for Christmas meal support and other services and discussed continued interagency coordination as county relief providers adapt to changes in Red Cross service in the area.

Ending: Fiscal court members expressed appreciation and urged continued coordination among local nonprofits and county agencies to address food insecurity, rental and utility needs and holiday assistance needs shifted by the Red Cross changes.","High Point Charities told Oldham County Fiscal Court it provided 30,064 client services in 2024, served nearly 953 Oldham County families, and expanded a community kitchen funded in part by county support; High Point staff also outlined options to fill gaps left by a Red Cross local closure.",{"_33":112,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":113,"_41":114,"_43":115,"_45":116,"_47":117,"_49":118,"_51":119,"_53":120,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":121,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":122,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6681054,"Oldham fiscal court approves architect invoice after heated debate over police headquarters design and costs",3697,1879000,5576000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2343649-8a19d43a6e6b9752985386ab6566d62f&start=1879&end=5576","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2343649-8a19d43a6e6b9752985386ab6566d62f/thumbnail_1879000.jpg","/articles/6681054/Oldham-County/Kentucky/Oldham-fiscal-court-approves-architect-invoice-after-heated-debate-over-police-headquarters-design-and-costs","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6681054-2da46c75e9e9eb524092d1051528fe02/orig.mp4?Expires=1775864328&Signature=awYBIO6~YPk6kLMe-o02Dlg9-qznyeKZQnUcKNpXNXuXEFCCVEIjhy7yU3dzj1MtL7r8b2xmWkr4NLXvUvHDUXFQKgkZB3krgbuGE-qT1baJOdpOrDxPZ5DTftKLtL6K9IUlmsIzyLspXDjLpRxcyMbUB~jxRJaTdMPL6oa5A~o64rGgpayJ6yF3xC6EypY1E6KWfrICJvPqUZnIA5MjnGsbn-0WaFq8omqyyoQqx6hlXjSh84uLMk1LoaNhPy3ozKezdX0nsh343oS9noXI30i0MrPr5oXtSFKyCKTaVZv4im2ejvF51-J5Ys6uQneJR~5kjwlzpwJXJuieq8q-PQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Oldham County Fiscal Court voted to pay an invoice from JKS Architects after an extended discussion about the firm’s work on a proposed police headquarters and broader concerns about project communication and cost transparency.

The dispute began when a magistrate flagged a $136,800 bill from JKS Architects in the courthouse payables, asking that payment be pulled until the court could verify the amount and scope. Court members discovered differing understandings of what the contract authorized and how far design work had progressed without a full briefing to the larger body.

Why it matters: The JKS work supports plans to renovate and reorient a former shooting range building in Crestwood for a new Oldham County police headquarters. Fiscal court members expressed concern about escalating design fees and uncertainty over the project’s maximum cost, potential additions such as roads or parking, and whether the court had seen a schematic that would let members judge scope and price.

According to comments on the record, the contract includes a per‑trip reimbursement of $1,200 for architect visits and sets the architect’s fee as a percentage of project cost (discussed on the record as 9% in the contract language). Board members pointed to a schematic-design milestone listed in the contract documents (15% of design fees) and cited an example schematic-phase figure of $259,200 in the architect’s invoice materials. Several magistrates said they were not previously shown a specific schematic-fee figure before the invoice arrived in payables.

Magistrates and the county judge exchanged views about project process. Judge Vogel said JKS had been asked to study whether the existing building could be retrofitted, had met with county staff multiple times, and had generated concepts that the small administrative team wanted to refine before presenting to the full court. Several magistrates said that while they understand professional services must be paid, the court needs clearer, earlier updates and a defined spending threshold for the schematic phase.

Votes and motions: The court first voted to approve the day’s payables with the exclusion of the JKS invoice (invoice number 2, $136,800) so the court could research the contract and minutes. After a recess and further debate, a later motion to approve the JKS invoice passed on roll call. The roll-call discussion on the second vote recorded four votes in favor, two opposed and one abstention.

What the invoice covered (on the record): court discussion and contract excerpts referenced schematic design, design development, construction documents and construction administration phases, with hourly rates noted in the AIA contract documents quoted to the court. Magistrates asked that future steps include a clear schematic deliverable and a proposed cap for schematic-phase fees; one magistrate proposed capping schematic-phase work at $259,200 while the court continued to discuss what level of design to authorize next.

Next steps: Judge Vogel said the administration will present a schematic design to the court soon (he estimated within weeks) and that court members will have an opportunity to accept, reject or ask for revisions before the project advances. Several magistrates suggested a monthly written status update on county capital projects to keep the full court informed as administrative work proceeds.

Local context: The court has already purchased adjacent property to provide vehicle and public access to the Crestwood site. Members noted that road, site and construction costs are separate from the architect’s professional services fees and will be additional budget decisions for fiscal court.

Ending: The episode left the court with not only the immediate decision to pay the invoice but also clearer demands from magistrates for structured project updates, a schematic deliverable for review and an explicit conversation about how much the court is willing to spend before design moves forward.","Fiscal Court approved a $136,800 invoice from JKS Architects after a multi-hour discussion about scope, contract terms and communication; justices and the judge differed over how decisions on a proposed police headquarters have been handled and how much to authorize before schematic designs are presented.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: Oldham County Fiscal Court actions this session

Oldham County jailer presents annual policy updates; fiscal court approves updated manual

Oldham County clerk turns over $513,644.93 in excess fees; announces March Agtag farm‑tag campaign

High Point Charities reports rising demand: nearly half of its clients came from Oldham County in 2024

Oldham fiscal court approves architect invoice after heated debate over police headquarters design and costs