Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

North Dakota prohibits misbranding cell-cultured protein as meat food product

February 18, 2025 | 2025 House Introduced Bills, 2025 House Bills, 2025 Bills, North Dakota Legislation Bills, North Dakota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

North Dakota prohibits misbranding cell-cultured protein as meat food product
The North Dakota State Legislature convened on February 18, 2025, to introduce House Bill 1151, a significant piece of legislation aimed at regulating the labeling and marketing of cell-cultured protein products. This bill seeks to clarify the distinction between traditional meat products and lab-grown alternatives, addressing growing concerns over consumer transparency and food safety.

House Bill 1151 amends Section 19-02.1-12.1 of the North Dakota Century Code, explicitly prohibiting the misrepresentation of cell-cultured protein as meat food products. Key provisions of the bill include strict labeling requirements that mandate cell-cultured products must not be packaged in a manner that could be deemed "deceptively similar" to traditional meat products. This includes clear labeling in compliance with the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act and the Food and Drug Administration's guidelines.

The bill defines "cell-cultured protein" as food developed in a laboratory from animal cells, excluding species regulated under federal meat inspection laws. It also clarifies that "meat food product" refers to items derived from agricultural animals, thereby excluding cell-cultured alternatives from this classification.

Debate surrounding House Bill 1151 has been notable, with proponents arguing that it is essential for consumer protection and informed choice in the marketplace. They assert that as cell-cultured products gain popularity, clear labeling will help consumers make educated decisions about their food. Conversely, opponents of the bill express concerns that such regulations may stifle innovation in the food industry and limit consumer access to alternative protein sources.

The implications of House Bill 1151 extend beyond labeling; it reflects broader trends in the food industry as consumer preferences shift towards sustainable and alternative protein sources. Experts suggest that the bill could set a precedent for similar legislation in other states, potentially influencing national standards for labeling cell-cultured foods.

As the legislative process unfolds, stakeholders from various sectors, including agriculture, food production, and consumer advocacy, will continue to monitor the bill's progress. The outcome of House Bill 1151 could significantly impact the future of food labeling and the acceptance of lab-grown proteins in the marketplace.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep North Dakota articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI