In a meeting filled with passionate voices and heartfelt testimonies, the Utah Senate Business and Labor Committee convened on February 19, 2025, to discuss a topic that resonates deeply with many residents: the biannual clock change. As the clock ticks toward another springtime shift, the committee explored the implications of a proposed bill aimed at ending the practice of moving clocks forward and back.
The discussion opened with a strong statement from a committee member, who highlighted that nearly 80% of Utahns are weary of the time change, a practice that has persisted since World War I. "Everybody's pretty tired of it," they remarked, emphasizing that the majority of the world has moved on from this antiquated system. The member pointed out that less than a third of countries still observe daylight saving time, suggesting that it may be time for Utah to follow suit.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free The bill, initially passed five years ago under Senator Harper's sponsorship, sought to keep Utah on daylight saving time year-round, contingent upon federal approval. However, the anticipated federal legislation never materialized, leaving Utahns to continue adjusting their clocks twice a year. The committee member expressed their commitment to representing the voices of constituents who are eager for change, stating, "I’m happy to represent the 80% of Utahns that actually want this bill to go through."
Adding a personal touch to the discussion, Stacy Muhlestein, a resident from Monticello, shared her family's struggles with the time changes. She articulated the profound impact that shifting clocks have on families with young children and those with neurodiverse members. "For our families, the changing of the clocks does not affect just one hour of sleep," she explained. The disruptions lead to weeks of upheaval, particularly for families with autistic children, who experience heightened meltdowns and behavioral challenges during the adjustment period.
Muhlestein's testimony underscored the unseen consequences of the time change, calling for the state to remain on standard time until the federal government allows for a permanent daylight saving time. Her plea resonated with many in the room, highlighting the need for legislative action that considers the well-being of vulnerable families.
As the meeting progressed, it became clear that the issue of time change is not merely a matter of convenience but one that affects the daily lives and mental health of many Utahns. The committee's discussions reflect a growing desire for legislative reform that aligns with the needs and preferences of the community. With the clock ticking, the future of Utah's timekeeping practices hangs in the balance, awaiting a decision that could bring relief to countless families across the state.