The Missouri State Legislature convened on February 19, 2025, to introduce House Bill 195, also known as the "Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act." This bill seeks to amend existing legislation regarding the treatment of infants born alive during or after an abortion procedure.
The primary purpose of House Bill 195 is to ensure that any child born alive during an abortion is granted the same rights and protections as any other liveborn child in Missouri. Key provisions of the bill mandate that healthcare providers present at the time of such an event must exercise the same level of care and diligence to preserve the life and health of the child as they would for any other child born at the same gestational age. Furthermore, the bill requires that these infants be immediately transported to a hospital for further care.
The bill also includes a reporting requirement for healthcare providers or employees who witness violations of these provisions, mandating that they report any such incidents to law enforcement authorities. This aspect of the bill has sparked notable debate among lawmakers and advocacy groups, with proponents arguing that it is essential for protecting the rights of vulnerable infants, while opponents raise concerns about the implications for women's reproductive rights and the potential for increased legal liabilities for healthcare providers.
The introduction of House Bill 195 has significant social and political implications, as it aligns with a broader national conversation surrounding abortion rights and the treatment of infants born during abortion procedures. Experts suggest that if passed, the bill could lead to heightened tensions between pro-choice and pro-life advocates, potentially influencing future legislative sessions and elections in Missouri.
As the bill progresses through the legislative process, it will likely face scrutiny and amendments, reflecting the contentious nature of the issues it addresses. The outcome of House Bill 195 could set a precedent for similar legislation in other states, making it a focal point in the ongoing debate over reproductive rights in the United States.